Wolfram Theory of Everything, Sacred geometry and E8 string theory

Post under construction

Wolframs Theory of Everything can be used to find a theory of everything, from what I heard, so we will be going over Wolframs theory in addition Wolframs theory according to alien scientist looks very similar to PhOENIX theory of everything which looks just like Tetryonics which as I have shown looks similar to the E8 tetrahedron grid fractal so we will also be going over PhOENIX theory, we will also be going over some other theories due to some aspects of them which can be used to create a theory of everything.

List of content:

1. Wolfram Theory of Everything: PhOENIX theory, self-simulation and computer error correcting code
2. Linking E-infinity/E8 sacred geometry and Wolfram physics: WSM and Sentient singularity theory
3. Sacred geometry: Polyhedral combinatorics, Hypersphere, Merkaba Stellated Dodecahedron, and 37 and 73
4. E8 Quasicrystal spacetime/E8 string theory

Wolfram Theory of Everything

Stephen Wolfram has a plan to develop a new physics of our universe

Stephen Wolfram is a cult figure in programming and mathematics.

He is the brains behind Wolfram Alpha, a website that tries to answer questions by using algorithms to sift through a massive database of information. He is also responsible for Mathematica, a computer system used by scientists the world over.

Last week, Wolfram launched a new venture: the Wolfram Physics Project, an ambitious attempt to develop a new physics of our universe.

The new physics, he declares, is computational. The guiding idea is that everything can be boiled down to the application of simple rules to fundamental building blocks.

Why do we need such a theory? After all, we already have two extraordinarily successful physical theories.

These are general relativity — a theory of gravity and the large-scale structure of the universe — and quantum mechanics — a theory of the basic constituents of matter, sub-atomic particles, and their interactions.

Haven't we got physics licked?

Not quite. While we have an excellent theory of how gravity works for large objects, such as stars and planets and even people, we don't understand gravity at extremely high energies or for extremely small things.

General relativity "breaks down" when we try to extend it into the miniature realm where quantum mechanics rules.

This has led to a quest for the holy grail of physics: a theory of quantum gravity, which would combine what we know from general relativity with what we know from quantum mechanics to produce an entirely new physical theory.

The current best approach we have to quantum gravity is string theory.

This theory has been a work in progress for 50 years or so, and while it has achieved some success there is a growing dissatisfaction with it as an approach.

Wolfram is attempting to provide an alternative to string theory. He does so via a branch of mathematics called graph theory, which studies groups of points or nodes connected by lines or edges.

Think of a social networking platform.

Start with one person: Betty. Next, add a simple rule: every person adds three friends. Apply the rule to Betty: now she has three friends. Apply the rule again to every person (including the one you started with, namely: Betty). Keep applying the rule and, pretty soon, the network of friends forms a complex graph.

In Wolfram's theory, applying a simple rule multiple times creates a complex network of points and connections. (Supplied: Samuel Baron)

Wolfram's proposal is that the universe can be modelled in much the same way.

The goal of physics, he suggests, is to work out the rules that the universal graph obeys.

Key to his suggestion is that a suitably complicated graph looks like a geometry. For instance, imagine a cube and a graph that resembles it.

In the same way that a collection of points and lines can approximate a solid cube, Wolfram argues that space itself may be a mesh that knits together a series of nodes. (Supplied: Sam Baron)

Wolfram argues that extremely complex graphs resemble surfaces and volumes: add enough nodes and connect them with enough lines and you form a kind of mesh. He maintains that space itself can be thought of as a mesh that knits together a series of nodes in this fashion.

How can complicated meshes of nodes help with the project of reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics? Well, quantum theory deals with discrete objects with discrete properties. General relativity, on the other hand, treats the universe as a continuum and gravity as a continuous force.

If we can build a theory that can do what general relativity does but that starts from discrete structures like graphs, then the prospects for reconciling general relativity and quantum mechanics start to look more promising.

If we can build a geometry that resembles the one given to us by general relativity using a discrete structure, then the prospects look even better.

Stephen Wolfram believes that space may be a complex mesh of points connected by a simple rule that is iterated many times. (WolframPhysics.org)

While Wolfram's project is promising, it does contain more than a hint of hubris.

Wolfram is going up against the Einsteins and Hawkings of the world, and he's doing it without a life spent publishing in physics journals.

(He did publish several physics papers as a teenage prodigy, but that was 40 years ago, as well as a book A New Kind of Science, which is the spiritual predecessor of the Wolfram Physics Project.)

Moreover, his approach is not wholly original.

It is similar to two existing approaches to quantum gravity: causal set theory and loop quantum gravity, neither of which get much of a mention in Wolfram's grand designs.

Nonetheless, the project is notable for three reasons.

First, Wolfram has a broad audience and he will do a lot to popularise the approach that he advocates. Proponents of loop quantum gravity in particular lament the predominance of string theory within the physics community. Wolfram may help to underwrite a paradigm shift in physics.

Second, Wolfram provides a very careful overview of the project from the basic principles of graph theory up to general relativity. This will make it easier for individuals to get up to speed with the general approach and potentially make contributions of their own.

Third, the project is "open source", inviting contributions from citizen scientists.

Finally We May Have a Path to the Fundamental Theory of Physics… and It’s Beautiful

It’s unexpected, surprising—and for me incredibly exciting. To be fair, at some level I’ve been working towards this for nearly 50 years. But it’s just in the last few months that it’s finally come together. And it’s much more wonderful, and beautiful, than I’d ever imagined.

In many ways it’s the ultimate question in natural science: How does our universe work? Is there a fundamental theory? An incredible amount has been figured out about physics over the past few hundred years. But even with everything that’s been done—and it’s very impressive—we still, after all this time, don’t have a truly fundamental theory of physics.

Back when I used do theoretical physics for a living, I must admit I didn’t think much about trying to find a fundamental theory; I was more concerned about what we could figure out based on the theories we had. And somehow I think I imagined that if there was a fundamental theory, it would inevitably be very complicated.

But in the early 1980s, when I started studying the computational universe of simple programs I made what was for me a very surprising and important discovery: that even when the underlying rules for a system are extremely simple, the behavior of the system as a whole can be essentially arbitrarily rich and complex.

And this got me thinking: Could the universe work this way? Could it in fact be that underneath all of this richness and complexity we see in physics there are just simple rules? I soon realized that if that was going to be the case, we’d in effect have to go underneath space and time and basically everything we know. Our rules would have to operate at some lower level, and all of physics would just have to emerge.

By the early 1990s I had a definite idea about how the rules might work, and by the end of the 1990s I had figured out quite a bit about their implications for space, time, gravity and other things in physics—and, basically as an example of what one might be able to do with science based on studying the computational universe, I devoted nearly 100 pages to this in my book A New Kind of Science.

I always wanted to mount a big project to take my ideas further. I tried to start around 2004. But pretty soon I got swept up in building Wolfram|Alpha, and the Wolfram Language and everything around it. From time to time I would see physicist friends of mine, and I’d talk about my physics project. There’d be polite interest, but basically the feeling was that finding a fundamental theory of physics was just too hard, and only kooks would attempt it.

It didn’t help that there was something that bothered me about my ideas. The particular way I’d set up my rules seemed a little too inflexible, too contrived. In my life as a computational language designer I was constantly thinking about abstract systems of rules. And every so often I’d wonder if they might be relevant for physics. But I never got anywhere. Until, suddenly, in the fall of 2018, I had a little idea.

It was in some ways simple and obvious, if very abstract. But what was most important about it to me was that it was so elegant and minimal. Finally I had something that felt right to me as a serious possibility for how physics might work. But wonderful things were happening with the Wolfram Language, and I was busy thinking about all the implications of finally having a full-scale computational language.

But then, at our annual Summer School in 2019, there were two young physicists (Jonathan Gorard and Max Piskunov) who were like, “You just have to pursue this!” Physics had been my great passion when I was young, and in August 2019 I had a big birthday and realized that, yes, after all these years I really should see if I can make something work.

So—along with the two young physicists who’d encouraged me—I began in earnest in October 2019. It helped that—after a lifetime of developing them—we now had great computational tools. And it wasn’t long before we started finding what I might call “very interesting things”. We reproduced, more elegantly, what I had done in the 1990s. And from tiny, structureless rules out were coming space, time, relativity, gravity and hints of quantum mechanics.

We were doing zillions of computer experiments, building intuition. And gradually things were becoming clearer. We started understanding how quantum mechanics works. Then we realized what energy is. We found an outline derivation of my late friend and mentor Richard Feynman’s path integral. We started seeing some deep structural connections between relativity and quantum mechanics. Everything just started falling into place. All those things I’d known about in physics for nearly 50 years—and finally we had a way to see not just what was true, but why.

I hadn’t ever imagined anything like this would happen. I expected that we’d start exploring simple rules and gradually, if we were lucky, we’d get hints here or there about connections to physics. I thought maybe we’d be able to have a possible model for the first 10^-100 seconds of the universe, but we’d spend years trying to see whether it might actually connect to the physics we see today.

In the end, if we’re going to have a complete fundamental theory of physics, we’re going to have to find the specific rule for our universe. And I don’t know how hard that’s going to be. I don’t know if it’s going to take a month, a year, a decade or a century. A few months ago I would also have said that I don’t even know if we’ve got the right framework for finding it.

But I wouldn’t say that anymore. Too much has worked. Too many things have fallen into place. We don’t know if the precise details of how our rules are set up are correct, or how simple or not the final rules may be. But at this point I am certain that the basic framework we have is telling us fundamentally how physics works.

It’s always a test for scientific models to compare how much you put in with how much you get out. And I’ve never seen anything that comes close. What we put in is about as tiny as it could be. But what we’re getting out are huge chunks of the most sophisticated things that are known about physics. And what’s most amazing to me is that at least so far we’ve not run across a single thing where we’ve had to say “oh, to explain that we have to add something to our model”. Sometimes it’s not easy to see how things work, but so far it’s always just been a question of understanding what the model already says, not adding something new.

At the lowest level, the rules we’ve got are about as minimal as anything could be. (Amusingly, their basic structure can be expressed in a fraction of a line of symbolic Wolfram Language code.) And in their raw form, they don’t really engage with all the rich ideas and structure that exist, for example, in mathematics. But as soon as we start looking at the consequences of the rules when they’re applied zillions of times, it becomes clear that they’re very elegantly connected to a lot of wonderful recent mathematics.

There’s something similar with physics, too. The basic structure of our models seems alien and bizarrely different from almost everything that’s been done in physics for at least the past century or so. But as we’ve gotten further in investigating our models something amazing has happened: we’ve found that not just one, but many of the popular theoretical frameworks that have been pursued in physics in the past few decades are actually directly relevant to our models.

I was worried this was going to be one of those “you’ve got to throw out the old” advances in science. It’s not. Yes, the underlying structure of our models is different. Yes, the initial approach and methods are different. And, yes, a bunch of new ideas are needed. But to make everything work we’re going to have to build on a lot of what my physicist friends have been working so hard on for the past few decades.

And then there’ll be the physics experiments. If you’d asked me even a couple of months ago when we’d get anything experimentally testable from our models I would have said it was far away. And that it probably wouldn’t happen until we’d pretty much found the final rule. But it looks like I was wrong. And in fact we’ve already got some good hints of bizarre new things that might be out there to look for.

OK, so what do we need to do now? I’m thrilled to say that I think we’ve found a path to the fundamental theory of physics. We’ve built a paradigm and a framework (and, yes, we’ve built lots of good, practical, computational tools too). But now we need to finish the job. We need to work through a lot of complicated computation, mathematics and physics. And see if we can finally deliver the answer to how our universe fundamentally works.

It’s an exciting moment, and I want to share it. I’m looking forward to being deeply involved. But this isn’t just a project for me or our small team. This is a project for the world. It’s going to be a great achievement when it’s done. And I’d like to see it shared as widely as possible. Yes, a lot of what has to be done requires top-of-the-line physics and math knowledge. But I want to expose everything as broadly as possible, so everyone can be involved in—and I hope inspired by—what I think is going to be a great and historic intellectual adventure.

Today we’re officially launching our Physics Project. From here on, we’ll be livestreaming what we’re doing—sharing whatever we discover in real time with the world. (We’ll also soon be releasing more than 400 hours of video that we’ve already accumulated.) I’m posting all my working materials going back to the 1990s, and we’re releasing all our software tools. We’ll be putting out bulletins about progress, and there’ll be educational programs around the project.

Oh, yes, and we’re putting up a Registry of Notable Universes. It’s already populated with nearly a thousand rules. I don’t think any of the ones in there yet are our own universe—though I’m not completely sure. But sometime—I hope soon—there might just be a rule entered in the Registry that has all the right properties, and that we’ll slowly discover that, yes, this is it—our universe finally decoded.

PhOENIX theory

Back in December of 2015 renowned mathematician and computer scientist Stephen Wolfram Published an article on his blog titled “What is space time, really?”

In this article he masterfully outlines a new computational framework for looking at our Universe as if it were a massive computer algorithm and a path which he believes could lead to a complete theory of physics, unifying quantum physics and relativity, through finding the most simplistic discrete building blocks and rules for the known universe, much like the simple generating functions used to produce fractals or the mathematical framework he wrote about in “A New Kind of Science”, his fascinating 1,000+ page tome on how highly complex patterns could emerge from simple 1 dimensional, 2 bit systems using basic iteration algorithms.

In this recent “What is Space time?” article, he proposed that a new model of unified physics might be generated by using simple computational algorithms, only in 3D instead of 1. He also talks about some of the key mathematical tools for constructing networks: things like knots, nodes, and graph theory.

Though a lot of people in physics have thumbed their nose at this work or simply aren’t aware of it, I for one, trust that Stephen and others like him, are on to something here.

A recent article was published in Quanta magazine that talked about how changes in the phases of matter were actually linked to symmetry breaking by condensed matter physicists, for example liquid water turns to solid ice when the molecules lose rotational symmetry, and become locked into a lattice. In addition to this, are these weird effects which show up as matter is cooled near absolute zero, which can’t be accurately described by a symmetry breaking, particles which normally act like tiny spheres, suddenly grow legs. Electrons begin to demonstrate fractional charges and experiments have begun to reveal more exotic phases, which symmetry breaking alone cannot explain. What is needed, according to the scientists in the article, is a new topological order. Which is BTW exactly what we are now claiming to have with PhOENIX theory, in case you missed it. To quote from the article:

“The topological phases only show up near absolute zero, because only at such low temperatures can systems of particles settle into their lowest-energy quantum “ground state.” In the ground state, the delicate interactions that correlate particles’ identities — effects that are destroyed at higher temperatures — link up particles in global patterns of quantum entanglement. Instead of having individual mathematical descriptions, particles become components of a more complicated function that describes all of them at once, often with entirely new particles emerging as the excitations of the global phase. The long-range entanglement patterns that arise are topological, or impervious to local changes, like the number of holes in a manifold.”

And this article was just published 10 days after we released our first publication of PhOENIX Theory, which we claim is that topological ordering, and the bottom-up restructuring of physics. Although we only showed an elementary introduction to the core of PhOENIX theory, we will be revealing more as things progress with our experimental research.

PhOENIX is the Physics of Entanglements, Networks, and Information eXchanges. The theory was developed by Ken Griggs, a friend of mine and fellow physicist who I met by doing podcasts talking about theories of everything with open call-in lines. He has been a recurring guest on other AlienScientist videos, and I value his opinions and insights highly. This 20 year endeavor by Ken and a few other colleagues is rooted in decades of topology and combinatorics work by our friends in the math world, using tools that didn’t exist 40 years ago.

PhOENIX treats all of elementary particle physics as a series of entangled vertices connected by simple matching rules. And these vertices with entanglements connecting them are, in fact, just another way of visually representing particles and their respective matrices; we call them graphs. This is why matrix mechanics works so well for describing quantum theory, and the higher order graphs also explain away dark matter as the inert matrix formations which don’t interact with normal matter but still gravitate. There are even bigger cosmological implications, but we’ll save that for another time.

Let’s begin with a fundamental question: What is a Measurement?

PhOENIX says that, when a physicist goes out into nature and performs a measurement, what he is essentially doing is counting structures. And his tools of the trade (his mathematics and laboratory instruments) are simply: methods that work for counting those structures.

What the ancient Greek philosophers were speaking to when they talked about the "atomos", was the idea of the most basic, indivisible structures in nature.

As it turns out there was something smaller than 'atoms', those atoms are composed of protons and neutrons which are in turn composed of quarks which one would assume are composed of something much more basic and purely mathematical. And that line of thinking lead US to vertices, a vertex is the essence of the atomos. Vertices ARE the most basic building blocks of the universe and what we should now be calling ‘atoms’ in place of atomic nuclei. In order to begin building networks and graphs we need to first understand some rules for how these vertices can be connected or entangled with one another.

So let’s start with a single vertex with 3 degrees of freedom, we’ll call each leg x, y, and z for visualization purposes. and say that in each of these degrees of freedom, our vertex is either connected back to itself positively (a loop), entangled with another vertex (an edge), or connected to itself negatively (designated by an arrow). From this we can come up with a map of all the different combinations of possible sing vertex connections, and we find that there are ten possibilities or ten single-vertex building blocks or atoms.

If you begin to play around with this new set of building blocks, observing some basic rules, you’ll discover a system of interactions which looks exactly like particle physics with electrons and positrons, up and down quarks, and the W+ and W- particles associated with weak nuclear interactions. On the Top Row we have electroweak unification, and with the up and down quarks entangled on edge we can show strong nuclear force unification (in addition to what happens when you put protons and neutrons in the same matrix together).

Most physicists can tell you that two up quarks combine with a down quark to form the proton, and a neutron is formed by two down quarks plus an up quark. But PhOENIX, goes a step beyond this to show what these quarks actually are, in terms of information flow on a network. This traditional picture of quarks as spheres connected by gluons, can now be replaced with the entangled vertices of PhOENIX. Which show us that the neutron actually looks like this.

These are not some silly pictures pretending to be physics, this is actually real math. It’s called graph theory, and you can rewrite the graph as a matrix by first labeling each vertex, and then labeling the rows and columns in your matrix accordingly. For example: a graph with 3 vertices will produce a 3x3 matrix, a graph with 4 vertices will produce a 4X4 matrix. And so on. The vertices we just labelled, correspond to the rows and columns for your matrix which you can then populate by asking: how is vertex 1 connected to 1? How is 1 connected to 2? How is 1 connected to 3? And so on.

You can then plot out the matrix for the Neutron, or any other particle you can theorize, find the eigenvalues and the eigenvectors, and see that the solutions are, in fact, the very particles that this thing breaks down into, during particle decay experiments. It works in reverse as well to produce the other particles in nature.

In this way, graph theory connects linear algebra to topology, and shows us how the matrix forms a network. Graph Theory is real math, not just pictures, and with PhOENIX theory we have shown for the first time ever, how to use this math to describe the most basic interactions in particle physics, and combined with our First paper on combinatorial relativity theory, we show the basics for how the space time network is constructed.

In our second paper, we will show quantum scattering theory, how to derive chemistry, nuclear theory, and the electroweak theory which includes electromagnetism. And in our third paper, we will derive the Holy Grail of Physics: quantum gravity.

At the fundamental core of physics, all particles in the known universe are simply bound information flows (or energy). These bundles of spatially-entangled vertices known as particles communicate and interact through a massive web of iterating information exchanges mediated by a temporally-entangled network. Like a giant entangled tapestry which threads all the universe together in time.

There is an emerging trend in physics toward the idea that quantum entanglement is intimately responsible for gravitation. And there is also a lot of attention being given to new theories of entropic gravity. PhOENIX connects these two emerging viewpoints and says that the Force of Gravity or quantum gravity is a residual effect of quantum entanglement over very large scale networks. Gravity is a sort of entropy which evolves out of quantum entanglement in higher order systems.

At the fundamental level of physics, all matter in the known universe is simply bundles of vertices tied together in these entangled knots, which communicate through a massive web of constant information exchange. Like a giant entangled thread which binds all the universe together. According new theories of physics "antimatter" is actually the reverse opposite of these loops or knots, it terminates the ends of the thread so to speak. So by exploiting this quantum disentangling property of antimatter, surrounding the surface of an object with negative energy states, we can theoretically disentangle regions of space-time, thereby reducing, negating, or reversing the effects of gravity, which modern science is now realizing is itself just a function of quantum entanglement.

So case in point: If quantum entanglement holds the key to quantum gravity, the best way to test that theory is to shut off quantum entanglement and see what happens to gravity. And PhOENIX theory has now given us a working theoretical basis on which to build and achieve just that.

Scientists still don’t even know what antimatter really is or how it works. But according to PhOENIX, Antimatter is not quite what we thought it was. Antimatter is built upon the same vertex structure as matter, but it differs in the way that it entangles outwardly to the rest of the universe, (this is that ‘second notion of time’ or quantum arrow of time that all these theorists are still struggling to explain). Antimatter terminates itself in time reverse to ordinary matter. It has the same entangled structure as ordinary matter except that the loops are replaced with arrows in our graphs. In the matrix form, the numbers become negative.

This theory not only shows us what antimatter is, it also makes new predictions on what it can be used for, Antimatter according to PhOENIX actually breaks the entanglement between ordinary matter across that boundary and terminates the ends of the thread so to speak. It isolates you inside of a negative block on the matrix. So by exploiting this quantum disentangling property of antimatter, surrounding the surface of an object with a veil of antimatter, we can theoretically disentangle regions of space-time, thereby reducing, negating, or reversing the effects of gravity locally within that bubble.

We now know how the Dirac Holes, or Negative Energy States create the conditions necessary for the Alcubierre Warp Drive Theory to work at much lower energy states than previously predicted. We can actually derive Alcubierre’s warp drive from more basic quantum principals using PhOENIX theory. The Dirac Sea is nothing more than a nest of entangled vertices. This is what physical science has been trying to achieve since its first unified formalism by Sir Isaac Newton.

The Universe Simulated Itself Into Existence

How real are you? What if everything you are, everything you know, all the people in your life as well as all the events were not physically there but just a very elaborate simulation? Philosopher Nick Bostrom famously considered this in his seminal paper “Are you living in a computer simulation?,” where he proposed that all of our existence may be just a product of very sophisticated computer simulations ran by advanced beings whose real nature we may never be able to know. Now a new theory has come along that takes it a step further – what if there are no advanced beings either and everything in “reality” is a self-simulation that generates itself from pure thought?

The physical universe is a “strange loop” says the new paper titled “The Self-Simulation Hypothesis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics” from the team at the Quantum Gravity Research, a Los Angeles-based theoretical physics institute founded by the scientist and entrepreneur Klee Irwin. They take Bostrom’s simulation hypothesis, which maintains that all of reality is an extremely detailed computer program, and ask, rather than relying on advanced lifeforms to create the amazing technology necessary to compose everything within our world, isn’t it more efficient to propose that the universe itself is a “mental self-simulation”? They tie this idea to quantum mechanics, seeing the universe as one of many possible quantum gravity models.

One important aspect that differentiates this view relates to the fact that Bostrom’s original hypothesis is materialistic, seeing the universe as inherently physical. To Bostrom, we could simply be part of an ancestor simulation, engineered by posthumans. Even the process of evolution itself could just be a mechanism by which the future beings are testing countless processes, purposefully moving humans through levels of biological and technological growth. In this way they also generate the supposed information or history of our world. Ultimately, we wouldn’t know the difference.

But where does the physical reality that would generate the simulations comes from, wonder the researchers? Their hypothesis takes a non-materialistic approach, saying that everything is information expressed as thought. As such, the universe “self-actualizes” itself into existence, relying on underlying algorithms and a rule they call “the principle of efficient language.”

Under this proposal, the entire simulation of everything in existence is just one “grand thought.” How would the simulation itself be originated? It was always there, say the researchers, explaining the concept of “timeless emergentism.” According to this idea, time isn’t there at all. Instead, the all-encompassing thought that is our reality offers a nested semblance of a hierarchical order, full of “sub-thoughts” that reach all the way down the rabbit hole towards the base mathematics and fundamental particles. This is also where the rule of efficient language comes in, suggesting that humans themselves are such “emergent sub-thoughts” and they experience and find meaning in the world through other sub-thoughts (called “code-steps or actions”) in the most economical fashion.

In correspondence with Big Think, physicist David Chester elaborated: “While many scientists presume materialism to be true, we believe that quantum mechanics may provide hints that our reality is a mental construct. Recent advances in quantum gravity, such as seeing spacetime emergent via a hologram, also is a hint that spacetime is not fundamental. This is also compatible with ancient Hermetic and Indian philosophy. In a sense, the mental construct of reality creates spacetime to efficiently understand itself by creating a network of subconscious entities that can interact and explore the totality of possibilities.”

The scientists link their hypothesis to panpsychism, which sees everything as thought or consciousness. The authors think that their “panpsychic self-simulation model” can even explain the origin of an overarching panconsciousness at the foundational level of the simulations, which “self-actualizes itself in a strange loop via self-simulation.” This panconsciousness also has free will and its various nested levels essentially have the ability to select what code to actualize, while making syntax choices. The goal of this consciousness? To generate meaning or information.

If all of this is hard to grasp, the authors offer another interesting idea that may link your everyday experience to these philosophical considerations. Think of your dreams as your own personal self-simulations, postulates the team. While they are rather primitive (by super-intelligent future AI standards), dreams tend to provide better resolution than current computer modeling and are a great example of the evolution of the human mind. As the scientists write, “What is most remarkable is the ultra-high-fidelity resolution of these mind-based simulations and the accuracy of the physics therein.” They point especially to lucid dreams, where the dreamer is aware of being in a dream, as instances of very accurate simulations created by your mind that may be impossible to distinguish from any other reality. To that end, now that you’re sitting here reading this article, how do you really know you’re not in a dream? The experience seems very high in resolution but so do some dreams. It’s not too much of a reach to imagine that an extremely powerful computer that we may be able to make in not-too-distant future could duplicate this level of detail.

Computer error correcting codes in physics

Computer (error correcting) codes embedded in string theories equations

When researchers dove deeper into supersymmetric string theory, something weird happened. They found the same kind of codes developers use to prevent data loss or transmission errors. Dr. James Gates Jr., discovered what he describes as the presence of what appear to resemble a form of computer code, called error correcting codes, embedded within, or resulting from, the equations of supersymmetry that describe fundamental particles.

Gates asks, “How could we discover whether we live inside a Matrix? One answer might be ‘Try to detect the presence of codes in the laws that describe physics.'” And this is precisely what he has done. Gates was studying representations of supersymmetry, a principle that (simplified) connects force particles (bosons) and matter particles (fermions). Gates claimed to have found binary error-correcting codes hidden in the mathematics of string theory, "We discovered that these equations contain codes, actual, literal error-correcting codes". Specifically, within the equations of supersymmetry he has found, quite unexpectedly, what are called “doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block codes.” This is the Hamming [Block] Code in particular. Here’s a basic breakdown:

• Linear: The XOR of any two valid codewords is another valid codeword.
• Self-dual: The code equals its own dual (like a mirror image).
• Doubly-even: All codewords have a number of 1s divisible by 4.

That’s a long-winded label for codes that are commonly used to remove errors in computer transmissions, for example to correct errors in a sequence of bits representing text that has been sent across a wire. To visualize these relationships, he constructs mysterious looking diagrams from mathematical equations and the use of graphical tools called Adinkra symbols, as a way to show how these error correction codes create our universe/physical reality.

In fact these codes are ubiquitous in several areas of mathematics. They are associated with sphere packings, lattices, reflection groups, octonions and exceptional Lie algebras (especially E8). There are other string theorists looking at these structures in a less hyped way to understand the role of algebraic concepts such as octonions and E8. It is always possible that these codes could play some kind of error correcting role in string theory preventing uncontolled decoherence of spacetime. These are natural mathematical structures.

It is an interesting intellectual exercise to think about the way the universe might run like a computer or quantum computer. People working on quantum computing are looking at these codes which are examples of stabilizer codes that can be generated as eigenvectors of Pauli matrices. They hope that the codes can be used to prevent decoherence and that this would make multi-qubit quantum computation feasible.

This finding raises a fascinating question, is the universe capable of self-correction? Is the universe debugging itself? What if physics is full of hidden logic designed to self-correct? Finding built-in error-correction logic within physical equations is eerie. It’s like discovering a try/catch block in raw spacetime. Gates explains, “If we’re seeing code in the equations of physics”, “maybe there’s a deeper layer to reality. Maybe reality is structured, or computed.” and “This unsuspected connection suggests that these codes may be ubiquitous in nature, and could even be embedded in the essence of reality. If this is the case, we might have something in common with the Matrix science-fiction films, which depict a world where everything human being’s experience is the product of a virtual-reality-generating computer network.”

How Space and Time Could Be a Quantum Error-Correcting Code

In 1994, a mathematician at AT&T Research named Peter Shor(opens a new tab) brought instant fame to “quantum computers” when he discovered(opens a new tab) that these hypothetical devices could quickly factor large numbers — and thus break much of modern cryptography. But a fundamental problem stood in the way of actually building quantum computers: the innate frailty of their physical components.

Unlike binary bits of information in ordinary computers, “qubits” consist of quantum particles that have some probability of being in each of two states, designated |0⟩ and |1⟩, at the same time. When qubits interact, their possible states become interdependent, each one’s chances of |0⟩ and |1⟩ hinging on those of the other. The contingent possibilities proliferate as the qubits become more and more “entangled” with each operation. Sustaining and manipulating this exponentially growing number of simultaneous possibilities are what makes quantum computers so theoretically powerful.

But qubits are maddeningly error-prone. The feeblest magnetic field or stray microwave pulse causes them to undergo “bit-flips” that switch their chances of being |0⟩ and |1⟩ relative to the other qubits, or “phase-flips” that invert the mathematical relationship between their two states. For quantum computers to work, scientists must find schemes for protecting information even when individual qubits get corrupted. What’s more, these schemes must detect and correct errors without directly measuring the qubits, since measurements collapse qubits’ coexisting possibilities into definite realities: plain old 0s or 1s that can’t sustain quantum computations.

In 1995, Shor followed his factoring algorithm with another stunner: proof(opens a new tab) that “quantum error-correcting codes” exist. The computer scientists Dorit Aharonov(opens a new tab) and Michael Ben-Or(opens a new tab) (and other researchers working independently) proved(opens a new tab) a year later that these codes could theoretically push error rates close to zero. “This was the central discovery in the ’90s that convinced people that scalable quantum computing should be possible at all,” said Scott Aaronson(opens a new tab), a leading quantum computer scientist at the University of Texas — “that it is merely a staggering problem of engineering.”

Now, even as small quantum computers are materializing in labs around the world, useful ones that will outclass ordinary computers remain years or decades away. Far more efficient quantum error-correcting codes are needed to cope with the daunting error rates of real qubits. The effort to design better codes is “one of the major thrusts of the field,” Aaronson said, along with improving the hardware.

But in the dogged pursuit of these codes over the past quarter-century, a funny thing happened in 2014, when physicists found evidence of a deep connection between quantum error correction and the nature of space, time and gravity. In Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, gravity is defined as the fabric of space and time — or “space-time” — bending around massive objects. (A ball tossed into the air travels along a straight line through space-time, which itself bends back toward Earth.) But powerful as Einstein’s theory is, physicists believe gravity must have a deeper, quantum origin from which the semblance of a space-time fabric somehow emerges.

That year — 2014 — three young quantum gravity researchers came to an astonishing realization. They were working in physicists’ theoretical playground of choice: a toy universe called “anti-de Sitter space” that works like a hologram. The bendy fabric of space-time in the interior of the universe is a projection that emerges from entangled quantum particles living on its outer boundary. Ahmed Almheiri(opens a new tab), Xi Dong(opens a new tab) and Daniel Harlow(opens a new tab) did calculations suggesting that this holographic “emergence” of space-time works just like a quantum error-correcting code. They conjectured(opens a new tab) in the Journal of High Energy Physics that space-time itself is a code — in anti-de Sitter (AdS) universes, at least. The paper has triggered a wave of activity in the quantum gravity community, and new quantum error-correcting codes have been discovered that capture more properties of space-time.

John Preskill(opens a new tab), a theoretical physicist at the California Institute of Technology, says quantum error correction explains how space-time achieves its “intrinsic robustness,” despite being woven out of fragile quantum stuff. “We’re not walking on eggshells to make sure we don’t make the geometry fall apart,” Preskill said. “I think this connection with quantum error correction is the deepest explanation we have for why that’s the case.”

The language of quantum error correction is also starting to enable researchers to probe the mysteries of black holes: spherical regions in which space-time curves so steeply inward toward the center that not even light can escape. “Everything traces back to black holes,” said Almheiri, who is now at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. These paradox-ridden places are where gravity reaches its zenith and Einstein’s general relativity theory fails. “There are some indications that if you understand which code space-time implements,” he said, “it might help us in understanding the black hole interior.”

As a bonus, researchers hope holographic space-time might also point the way to scalable quantum computing, fulfilling the long-ago vision of Shor and others. “Space-time is a lot smarter than us,” Almheiri said. “The kind of quantum error-correcting code which is implemented in these constructions is a very efficient code.”

So, how do quantum error-correcting codes work? The trick to protecting information in jittery qubits is to store it not in individual qubits, but in patterns of entanglement among many.

As a simple example, consider the three-qubit code: It uses three “physical” qubits to protect a single “logical” qubit of information against bit-flips. (The code isn’t really useful for quantum error correction because it can’t protect against phase-flips, but it’s nonetheless instructive.) The |0⟩ state of the logical qubit corresponds to all three physical qubits being in their |0⟩ states, and the |1⟩ state corresponds to all three being |1⟩’s. The system is in a “superposition” of these states, designated |000⟩ + |111⟩. But say one of the qubits bit-flips. How do we detect and correct the error without directly measuring any of the qubits?

The qubits can be fed through two gates in a quantum circuit. One gate checks the “parity” of the first and second physical qubit — whether they’re the same or different — and the other gate checks the parity of the first and third. When there’s no error (meaning the qubits are in the state |000⟩ + |111⟩), the parity-measuring gates determine that both the first and second and the first and third qubits are always the same. However, if the first qubit accidentally bit-flips, producing the state |100⟩ + |011⟩, the gates detect a difference in both of the pairs. For a bit-flip of the second qubit, yielding |010⟩ + |101⟩, the parity-measuring gates detect that the first and second qubits are different and first and third are the same, and if the third qubit flips, the gates indicate: same, different. These unique outcomes reveal which corrective surgery, if any, needs to be performed — an operation that flips back the first, second or third physical qubit without collapsing the logical qubit. “Quantum error correction, to me, it’s like magic,” Almheiri said.

The best error-correcting codes can typically recover all of the encoded information from slightly more than half of your physical qubits, even if the rest are corrupted. This fact is what hinted to Almheiri, Dong and Harlow in 2014 that quantum error correction might be related to the way anti-de Sitter space-time arises from quantum entanglement.

It’s important to note that AdS space is different from the space-time geometry of our “de Sitter” universe. Our universe is infused with positive vacuum energy that causes it to expand without bound, while anti-de Sitter space has negative vacuum energy, which gives it the hyperbolic geometry of one of M.C. Escher’s Circle Limit designs. Escher’s tessellated creatures become smaller and smaller moving outward from the circle’s center, eventually vanishing at the perimeter; similarly, the spatial dimension radiating away from the center of AdS space gradually shrinks and eventually disappears, establishing the universe’s outer boundary. AdS space gained popularity among quantum gravity theorists in 1997 after the renowned physicist Juan Maldacena discovered that the bendy space-time fabric in its interior is “holographically dual” to a quantum theory of particles living on the lower-dimensional, gravity-free boundary.

In exploring how the duality works, as hundreds of physicists have in the past two decades, Almheiri and colleagues noticed that any point in the interior of AdS space could be constructed from slightly more than half of the boundary — just as in an optimal quantum error-correcting code.

In their paper conjecturing that holographic space-time and quantum error correction are one and the same, they described how even a simple code could be understood as a 2D hologram. It consists of three “qutrits” — particles that exist in any of three states — sitting at equidistant points around a circle. The entangled trio of qutrits encode one logical qutrit, corresponding to a single space-time point in the circle’s center. The code protects the point against the erasure of any of the three qutrits.

Of course, one point is not much of a universe. In 2015, Harlow, Preskill, Fernando Pastawski and Beni Yoshida found another holographic code(opens a new tab), nicknamed the HaPPY code, that captures more properties of AdS space. The code tiles space in five-sided building blocks — “little Tinkertoys,” said Patrick Hayden(opens a new tab) of Stanford University, a leader in the research area. Each Tinkertoy represents a single space-time point. “These tiles would be playing the role of the fish in an Escher tiling,” Hayden said.

In the HaPPY code and other holographic error-correcting schemes that have been discovered, everything inside a region of the interior space-time called the “entanglement wedge” can be reconstructed from qubits on an adjacent region of the boundary. Overlapping regions on the boundary will have overlapping entanglement wedges, Hayden said, just as a logical qubit in a quantum computer is reproducible from many different subsets of physical qubits. “That’s where the error-correcting property comes in.”

“Quantum error correction gives us a more general way of thinking about geometry in this code language,” said Preskill, the Caltech physicist. The same language, he said, “ought to be applicable, in my opinion, to more general situations” — in particular, to a de Sitter universe like ours. But de Sitter space, lacking a spatial boundary, has so far proven much harder to understand as a hologram.

For now, researchers like Almheiri, Harlow and Hayden are sticking with AdS space, which shares many key properties with a de Sitter world but is simpler to study. Both space-time geometries abide by Einstein’s theory; they simply curve in different directions. Perhaps most importantly, both kinds of universes contain black holes. “The most fundamental property of gravity is that there are black holes,” said Harlow, who is now an assistant professor of physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “That’s what makes gravity different from all the other forces. That’s why quantum gravity is hard.”

The language of quantum error correction has provided a new way of describing black holes. The presence of a black hole is defined by “the breakdown of correctability,” Hayden said: “When there are so many errors that you can no longer keep track of what’s going on in the bulk [space-time] anymore, you get a black hole. It’s like a sink for your ignorance.”

Ignorance invariably abounds when it comes to black hole interiors. Stephen Hawking’s 1974 epiphany that black holes radiate heat, and thus eventually evaporate away, triggered the infamous “black hole information paradox,” which asks what happens to all the information that black holes swallow. Physicists need a quantum theory of gravity to understand how things that fall in black holes also get out. The issue may relate to cosmology and the birth of the universe, since expansion out of a Big Bang singularity is much like gravitational collapse into a black hole in reverse.

AdS space simplifies the information question. Since the boundary of an AdS universe is holographically dual to everything in it — black holes and all — the information that falls into a black hole is guaranteed never to be lost; it’s always holographically encoded on the universe’s boundary. Calculations suggest that to reconstruct information about a black hole’s interior from qubits on the boundary, you need access to entangled qubits throughout roughly three-quarters of the boundary. “Slightly more than half is not sufficient anymore,” Almheiri said. He added that the need for three-quarters seems to say something important about quantum gravity, but why that fraction comes up “is still an open question.”

In Almheiri’s first claim to fame in 2012, the tall, thin Emirati physicist and three collaborators deepened(opens a new tab) the information paradox. Their reasoning suggested that information might be prevented from ever falling into a black hole in the first place, by a “firewall” at the black hole’s event horizon.

Like most physicists, Almheiri doesn’t really believe black hole firewalls exist, but finding the way around them has proved difficult. Now, he thinks quantum error correction is what stops firewalls from forming, by protecting information even as it crosses black hole horizons. In his latest, solo work(opens a new tab), which appeared in October, he reported that quantum error correction is “essential for maintaining the smoothness of space-time at the horizon” of a two-mouthed black hole, called a wormhole. He speculates that quantum error correction, as well as preventing firewalls, is also how qubits escape a black hole after falling in, through strands of entanglement between the inside and outside that are themselves like miniature wormholes. This would resolve Hawking’s paradox.

This year, the Department of Defense is funding research into holographic space-time(opens a new tab), at least partly in case advances there might spin off more efficient error-correcting codes for quantum computers.

On the physics side, it remains to be seen whether de Sitter universes like ours can be described holographically, in terms of qubits and codes. “The whole connection is known for a world that is manifestly not our world,” Aaronson said. In a paper(opens a new tab) last summer, Dong, who is now at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and his co-authors Eva Silverstein(opens a new tab) and Gonzalo Torroba took a step in the de Sitter direction, with an attempt at a primitive holographic description. Researchers are still studying that particular proposal, but Preskill thinks the language of quantum error correction will ultimately carry over to actual space-time.

“It’s really entanglement which is holding the space together,” he said. “If you want to weave space-time together out of little pieces, you have to entangle them in the right way. And the right way is to build a quantum error-correcting code.”

Is spacetime a quantum error correcting code? Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence.

This particular paper, is quite remarkable. It provides a quantum computing take on quantum gravity. It proposes a toy model which resolves some central puzzles with regards to the AdS/CFT correspondence and it paves way for future work along the, "applications of quantum computing ideas to quantum gravity" line. This paper is hard to explain, it’ll take quite a lot to simplify it but I’ll try my best. I’m not gonna make it a popular rendition. I'll talk about the main details of the paper accompanied with some proofs.

An isometry is something which maps from one Hilbert space to another while preserving the inner produce. A perfect tensor, is one whose indices can be split into two sets of indices(one set being larger than the other) with the condition that the tensor is an isometry from the smaller set of indices to the larger set.

The tiles appeared bigger in the bulk and get smaller and smaller as it approached the boundary which is a property of a field of a discipline called differential geometry. The “disc” is basically a two dimensional hyperbolic space. Now HAPPY constructed a quantum code for this sort of Geometry. It's called the Pentagon code and I've attached it below.

So there’s one pentagon in the centre of the bulk and it has 5 legs going out of it and connecting it to other pentagons which split further. The connected legs are really contracted tensors. The un-contracted legs on the boundary are associated with physical spins while the tensor network inside corresponds to a pure state of the spins, and is called a holographic state. The Pentagon tiling is basically an isometric tensor from the bulk to the boundary. This isometry corresponds to an encoding transformation of a quantum error correcting code called the holographic code.

So, what does all that mean? Well you'll see in a bit, but do you remember the part under the isometry definition which talked about pushing an operator through a tensor? Well okay basically, you can push operators from a point in the bulk to the boundary. That's what isometry from bulk to boundary means.

Holographic state: If a tensor network composed of perfect tensors covers some geometric manifold with a boundary, and all the interior tensor legs are contracted, then a holographic state is a state interpretation of such tensor network where the physical degrees of freedom, are associated with the uncontracted legs at the boundary of the manifold.

Holographic code: A tensor network composed of perfect tensors which cover some geometric manifold with boundaries is a holographic code if it gives rise to an isometric map from uncontracted bulk legs to uncontracted boundary legs.

Holographic states reproduce many properties of the Ads/CFT. I will discuss some of these properties here. The first of these is called the Ryu-Takayanagi formula and the second is the negativity of tripartite information. I have depicted the proofs for these as demonstrated in the original paper. The Ryu-Takayanagi formula basically allows us to calculate the entropy of some sub-region we'll call A. So how do we get it? Well let's see...

I should mention that the major contribution here is from the cut. Small order corrections are required for that final term. Now, the second interesting property of holographic states is that the tripartite information is negative. The tripartite information is basically another name for the topological entropy, it characterises the entanglement in states of many body systems which have a topological order. Here's a proof for why its negative.

Alright, so what have we done so far? We've shown key aspects of Ads/CFT are satisfied with holographic states. So we get back the Ryu-Takayanagi formula and we show how the tripartite information is negative. Its time to talk about error correction in holographic codes.

There are many interesting properties associated with Holographic codes. That is to say, they solve a lot of stuff super nicely. I’ll tell you all the things which need solving first, or what the AdS/CFT correspondence demands and then how holographic codes meet those demands.

AdS- Rindler reconstruction

So what is reconstructed? Alright so basically a bulk operator can be reconstructed from a boundary operator. Still confused? Alright I’ll slow down.

You see that? Okay so in the hyperbolic disc, there are a few things of importance:

• A region on the boundary dubbed “A”
• A geodesic line (shortest path between two points in curved space) connecting the two extreme points in A
• The space between the above two which is called the causal wedge

According to the AdS-Rindler reconstruction, if you have a bulk operator lying in the casual wedge of A, then it can be reconstructed as a boundary operator on the boundary of A. (Kinda makes sense if you think about AdS/CFT right?) okay so the deal is that if the operator Q(x) is deeper in the bulk, then there are multiple regions which contain Q(x) in their causal wedges. So the reconstruction should work for all of those regions. BAZINGA that leads to an interesting problem called the causal wedge problem.

Causal wedge puzzle

So if you divide the disc in these different ways, meaning that your bulk operator lies in different causal wedges, what you end up with is kind of an issue… see, in the first case, if it lies in BC’s causal wedge, it can be reconstructed on the BC boundary and it commutes with any operator comfortably living on A. But a similar argument follows for the other regions where it can be reconstructed on AC and AB and the operator commutes with operators in the regions B and C respectively. So according to this, if the operator lies in a region of the bulk where it can exist in multiple causal wedges, then the operator can be reconstructed on any part of the disc and it commutes with all local operators on the boundary.

So there are two ways to solve this problem, one is to use gauge invariance of the boundary theory and the second is to use error correcting codes.

The second way basically says that the bulk operator doesn’t correspond to a single boundary operator. Instead, the boundary operators corresponding to the different regions may be equivalent in a low energy subspace of the boundary.

Entanglement wedge

Alright so in the first diagram, suppose we have these two regions which represent the causal wedges of A and C. But suppose we want the causal region that represents the union of A and C. Now what do we do? Well basically, you draw geodesics connecting the extreme points of the local geodesics of A and C. This entire geodesic is called the global geodesic (physicists have the coolest names for things, no?) the entire region contained within the global geodesic is called the entanglement wedge of AC (Also makes sense if you think about it).

How to satisfy them

So the pentagon code is an isometry from the bulk to the boundary. Now lets get cooking with what that means. That basically means that if an operator is inputted at some tensor in the bulk, then that operator is pushed through the tensor until it covers some arc of the disc at the boundary. How? Well alright lets get to business with this tensor stuff.

So now we know that if we input in an operator, then it'll pass through three legs. AHA!!!!! So not only does this solve the causal wedge problem (why? because it shows how an operator at a single point in the bulk corresponds to an arc of the boundary) it also allows us to reconstruct an entanglement wedge. How? Well let's see.

Basically, the deeper an operator is within the bulk, the greater the region that it can cover on the boundary. Pretty neat right? Here’s a nice exercise that you could try if you’re interested, take the pentagon code, select a random pentagon in which you wish to input a tensor in. After that, push it through 3 of the 5 legs of the pentagon tensor and sketch out the boundary region. Its actually quite fun! I was at first puzzled about how I was getting the kind of global geodesic you see right now. Until I realised a very interesting property of this code (which should've been obvious but it didn't hit me right away), its made keeping in mind that there are 5 qubits on the boundary with one being in the centre of the bulk. So the global geodesic is actually between 3 of the 5 points on the boundary.

See? Pretty neat huh? I was actually a bit silly here, but the pentagon code actually corresponds to the 5 quit code. Remember my quantum error correction notes? Remember concatenation? Alright basically that one single code in the bulk is concatanated into 5 qubits which exist on the boundary.

So how do holographic codes and more specifically the pentagon code solve our problem? Well, the pentagon code allows us to reconstruct bulk operators on the boundary, so it shows bulk boundary correspondence and it allows us to construct entanglement wedges, which are determined the depth of the operator within the bulk.

Alright so as a final treat, I shall show you how blackholes come into the mix as well!

So what's the deal here? Well basically, operators are only reconstructed on a subspace of the boundary Hilbert space. This sounds like its at odds with the holographic correspondence right? Right so the resolution is that not every bulk operator is reproducible. Why? well, because it lies inside a black hole. So remember how initially the tensor legs of the central pentagon were contracted? Ah now they're not because the main pentagon's inside the black hole! So now we have an isometry that maps the five indices and the bulk legs of the remaining pentagons to the boundary. So how do you make a bigger black hole? Well, you eat up more layers in the tensor network... until eventually the black hole eats up the entire tensor network... On the bright side, the pentagon code really realises the bulk to boundary interpretation! So most boundary states correspond to a black hole in the bulk.

I hope I've managed to show you how interesting this paper is. It recreates so many things and it demonstrates how the ideas of quantum computing can be applied to other problems in Physics. The pentagon code, which belongs to the larger family of holographic quantum codes, manages to capture extremely important features of the AdS/CFT. It allows us to recreate the Ryu-Takayanagi formula, it demonstrates that tripartite information is always negative, resolves the causal wedge puzzle and demonstrates how operators deep in the entanglement wedge can be reconstructed and even gives space for black holes. There are issues however, current models are not dynamical and they do not talk about bulk locality at sub-AdS distances. And as Preskill himself said, "Its a toy model and needs to be flushed out eventually." Unfortunately, we live in De-sitter space, this model doesn't particularly help with understanding quantum gravity in that space.

So in the end, is space-time a quantum error correcting code? Well, we don’t know. It's an open research problem BUT, there seems to be an immense amount of hope with regards to the future. If quantum entanglements are the basis for spacetime geometry, then the quantum computing community will have a couple of things to say about the matter. Perhaps we can jump right into the heart of a blackhole with our years of experience on quantum error correction codes, computational complexity and knowledge about quantum information and resolve natures mysteries! Regardless, I'm just thrilled at a new class of error correcting codes. For me the most interesting question is this: For what other geometries can we construct quantum error correcting codes. Well, only time will tell!

Linking E-infinity/E8 sacred geometry and Wolfram Physics

Xen qabbalah:

The equation E=MC^2 shows everything is made up of energy, this energy is most likely electromagnetic energy since the speed of light is used in the equation and it has been shown matter can be created out of light and I have shown matter is made up of light(-energy) and this energy can be converted into information so energy and information are equivalent so energy is information, quanta of energy when joined together form a structure which transfers information through itself forming a more advance consciousness meaning the quanta of energy are conscious so energy is consciousness, but what is this information? This information is numbers in geometric forms so geometric energy but whats the proof of this geometric energy? Electromagnetism which is energy has geometry, electromagnetic fields are torus shaped so electromagnetism/light's torus structure along with the structure of spacetime, which both prove each other, prove the vacuum/zero-point field/spacetime/quantum fields are flower of life/(64) tetrahedron grid fractal/cubistic matrix shaped, the way this structure works is the zero-point is an infinite sea of energy this energy being electromagnetic and because of that waves fractal out of each other from and in the zero-point this fractal is the infinite-dimensional (64) tetrahedron grid fractal which contains the lower dimensional tetrahedron grids which are membranes/waves and some of these membranes/waves are quantum fields and one of these quantum fields is spacetime and these membranes/wave fields are fractaling oscilating spheres AKA the fractaling flower of life each sphere encases a tetrahedron of the tetrahedron grid, these spheres are actually 1-dimensional toruses/energy loops you could think of them as a wave being the surface of a sphere(particle) (or a torus), the fractaling wave/membrane on large scales, bigger than the universe, forms the spacetime/superstring dimensions and because it fractals it forms the spacetime/superstring dimensions on quantum scales as a torus structure which the superstring would cover("encase"), the equation E=MC^2 in E-infinity theory can answer where the dark matter/energy is, I have shown dark energy and dark matter are both the same thing and there an energy field and I have suggested dark matter/energy are basically emergent properties of quantum cubic spacetime, gravity is also an emergent property of spacetime as we all know.

Multidimensional polygons/Platonic Solids are encoded in the flower of life and because of that they join together to form the structure of quantum fields/Partiki grids(Morphogenetic Fields), "multidimensional polygon's... correspond to the Platonic solids... these polygons join together... and create the geometry of the quantum (loop) fields which creates the frequency of the quantum (loop) field, quantum (loop) fields are sub fields of vibrational dimension fields", multidimensional polygons are numbers and correspond to vibrational dimensions and quantum fields so they can encode the properties of the universe(basically the physics of the universe). Computer (error correcting) code is embedded in string theories equations and therefore the equations that explain the universe and these equations explain how these quantum fields/multidimensional polygons interact(/merge) and these equations equal numbers and can have geometric repersentations which would correspond to the numbers, the computer code/geometric repersentations are adinkra which are portions of the multidimensional polygons/fractaling tree of life because equations are equal to numbers which are multidimensional polygons, "the universe being like a quantum computing means it can calculate infinite universes and it calculates all multidimensional polygon added up which is 1+2+3+4+... so it calculates all possible waves/frequencies.".

Quanta of energy joined together/Entanglement network and quantum error correction code

The 3D (Auric) tree of life has 16 sephirot which forms a 15 dimensional matrix out of a 16 matrix. The 16 matrix/hamming code fractals, all the numbers in the matrix are entangled which forms the entanglement network which is the universe, all particles are entangled, the structure of the universe and light refracted water are similar: "Water reflects the entanglement structure because its fluidity and 2 degrees of freedom mirror the properties of spacetime", this structure looks like the brain an 11+ dimensional (tree of life) structure, proof the universe has 11 spacetime dimensions? probably, "3 dimensional wave surface projecting light onto a 2 dimensional plane. 4 dimensional energy structures being projected into 3 dimensional forms.", the tree of life 16 sephirot are one face of a cube so the tree of life structure is probably 4 dimensional and this would make sense because its impossible to depict the tree of life as stated above.

The 4 dimensions form the 16 dimensional matrix through the 4 by 4 matrix, the tree of life structure is cubic and is 4 dimensional each dimension is one of the 4 worlds of the tree of life which corresponds to one of the lines of the (tetrahedral) tetractys which is the 10 dimensions within 4 dimensions, 11/12-16 dimensions within 4 dimensions so a 16 dimensional torus in 4 dimensions, this 16 dimensional torus is related to E8 the 8 dimensional torus, also each sephirot is a tree of life so the structure corresponds to the cosmic tetractys/tree of life.

Energy pathways connect all the cubes in the 4 by 4 by 4 matrix and these energy pathways form the brain-like structure of the universe.

18 tree grid

The seed (of life), 6 as 1, 6 surrounding 1, the 7 sephirot of creation, when it expands forms 12 circles corresponding to the 12 tones in an octave and the tetractys, the hexagonal yod of the pascals triangle tetractys is equal to 12, the hexagonal yod is the 7/seed of life and in 3D it can either be a cube(istic matrix(flower of life)), which is formed out of the 10/12 tree grid, or the vector equilibrium which is the 12(12 tree grid) surrounding 1(the zero(0) point), the 12 circles surrounding the seed AKA 1, 12 as 1, the center of the seed, the central circle is 0 so 0=1=6=12, this to me looks like the beginning of a Binary-Trinary sequence, also 12 in 1=1/12 and 1+2+3+4+...=-1/12, the origin of the 5 and 6 connection is 10/12=5/6. The first circle being 0, the center, is where the fractal "starts" and the golden spiral("a perfect Fibonacci spiral") expands out of it forming the first 10/12 tree grid and the star tetrahedron, the tree of life can be represented as a double cube and this would form 12 sephirot out of the 10, the 3D (Auric) tree of life as I have shown before has 16 sephirot and looks like the double cube, due to its structure, with 4 central sephirot causing it to look like two hypercubes with two additional cubes so all the sephirot in the tree of life are cubes meaning the tree of life has 18 sephirot making it a 10/12 tree of life, this also means the entire cubistic matrix/flower of life is made up of sephirot, 18=6:6:6=star tetrahedron. One hypercube and one cube joined together, half of the tree, can encode a octahedron so two octahedron are in this tree and they can form the inner structure of two tetrahedrons, forming a star tetrahedron, encoded in a bigger cube which is this tree doubled(quadrupled since its 3D), 8 tetrahedrons are also encoded in each hypercube meaning we can form 8 star tetrahedrons out of both hypercubes meaning we can form the 64 tetrahedron grid out of the tree.

"Octave Doubling is found in the primary structure of the Aether. It is found in the isotropic vector matrix (tessellating tetrahedra & octahedra)(tetrahedron grid fractal) and the cosmic octave hierarchy. It is found in the structure of music and the electromagnetic spectrum. It is found in the 64-based (8-octave) nature of binary digital systems. It is also found in the octave-based growth of the chemical periodic table of elements."

11 spacetime dimensions formed out of the tetractys using E-infinitys Hausdorff (fractal) dimension

E-infinitys, which has infinite dimensions, Hausdorff (fractal dimension) is 4.236067977 and when we input this fractal dimension into the tetractys/triangle number equation we get roughly 11:

• 4.236067977×((4.236067977+1)÷2)≈11

Also I randomly put the fractal dimension and its inverse into the equation and got roughly phi+1 which is also phi squared:

• 4.236067977×((0.236067977+1)÷2)=2.6180339873824362645

Polyhedral combinatorics

Polyhedral combinatorics is basically how things join/combine to make other objects/things, this is what creates the universe, Platonic solids joining together to form quantum morphogenetic fields, this is generating source code of the matrix/network/grid, this is how the grid forms particles, it behaves like a simulation(the universe is not a simulation). (entanglement network)

Torus

"The silhouette of a tree in the pic is an ancient symbol for the tree of knowledge. We can see how the shape is represented as a torus with the roots and branches being as above, so below. So the toroidal shape symbolizes the tree of knowledge. The 12 point grid behind the tree silhouette, which is similar to that of the tree of life. This configuration is the same above as it is below and is perfectly symmetrical through a horizontal line of symmetry. I believe the 12 tree grid/Krystal Spiral is another sort of golden ratio, and represents a sacred geometry symbol for the tree of knowledge, as why the grid appears toroidal."

Flat torus

One of the most interesting surfaces in four-dimensional space is the Flat Torus in the Three-Sphere. The flat torus is constructed by a very simple formula, namely

[u,v] -> [cos(u + v), sin(u + v), cos(u - v), sin(u - v)]/sqrt(2)

where u and v both run from zero to 2 pi. The sum of the squares of these four coordinates is 1 so the object is completely contained in the hypersphere of radius 1 centered at the origin in four-space.

This torus is covered with circles, and when we project stereographically from the pole [0, 0, 0, 1] on the three-sphere, the image in three-space is a torus of revolution covered with circles each of which goes around the torus once in each direction. Any two of these circles are linked in the sense that a disc bounded by one of them is cut exactly once by any other of them.

We can get a better idea of the structure of this surface as an object in the three-sphere by rotating the sphere and observing the images down below in our three-dimensional space under stereographic projection. The surface appears to "turn itself inside out" under this transformation.

Half way through the rotation in four-dimensional space, the torus actually passes through the point of projection so the image in three-space is infinitely large, containing straight lines that are the images of circles going through the projection point. These surfaces are known as Cyclides of Dupin. All of the bounded ones are of fourth order, meeting any line not tangent to the surface in at most four points. The infinite ones are of third order.

In 2012, mathematics has given birth to a new baby. And she is beautiful! Her parents, Vincent Borrelli, Saïd Jabrane, Francis Lazarus, Boris Thibert and Damien Rohmer, who formed the Hévéa project, have named her the first C¹ isometric embedding of the flat square torus.

OK, her name is a bit long so I’ll just call her the Hévéa Torus. She is beautiful indeed… But what is she? Amazingly, she was first imagined a century and a half ago, by her ancestors Carl Friedrich Gauss and Bernhard Riemann, in 1854. But it took a century for her great grandfather John Nash to actually prove that she could one day be conceived, although he didn’t specify how. Another 20 years later, her grandfather Benoît Mandelbrot laid the foundations of a new kind of geometry which hinted at an actual possible conception. But, weirdly enough, it took the advent of computers to finally procreate her, after 5 long years of top-level mathematics research! And yet, it all started with a very simple problem…

These days, I’m spending way too much time playing the game on the right called Netwalk where a network needs to be built. The game is played within a square. One tricky aspect is that whenever you get out of the square on the right, you reappear on the left. Like in PACMAN, or in these awesome games.

What do these games have to do with the video above?

Amazingly, the network universe and the Hévéa Torus are geometrically identical!

You’re kidding, right? I mean, on the right we have a square, and the Hévéa Torus is… well, a weird twisted shape!

You’re right. From our perspective, these are very different. But, from the perspective of some being stuck within these 2D worlds, there is absolutely no difference! The Netwalk world and the Hévéa Torus are intrinsically mathematically (nearly) identical.

OK… I admit, there’s a slight difference in terms of accelerations in these geometries. We’ll get to that…

Humm… I have the biggest troubles imagining myself living in the Hévéa Torus…

You’re not the only one! It took two of the greatest giants of mathematics to figure out what it meant to live within a torus. The first one is Carl Friedrich Gauss, also known as the Prince of mathematics, who famously proved the Theorema Egregium. But, more importantly, it was Bernhard Riemann, Gauss’ disciple, who unlocked the wider geometry of so-called manifolds by providing a powerful new picture of what geometry could be.

What is this Riemann’s picture of geometry you’re talking about?

In short, a Riemannian manifold is a space, such that each local neighborhood of a point of that space looks flat. The torus of the video is an example of a 2-dimension manifold, also known as surface. Around each point, if you zoom sufficiently, then your surface will look like a 2-dimensional sheet of paper. And, on this sheet of paper, lengths and angles are the same as on actual sheets of paper!

Now, involving lengths and angles makes things complicated… so let’s start with a simpler kind of manifold: The topological torus.

The topological torus?

Topology is the art of forgetting the geometrical concepts of angles and lengths. This means that topology allows stretching sheets of paper without effectively changing it.

Can you give an example?

Sure! Topologically, it is straightforward to transform the Netwalk square into a torus. We merely have to glue together opposite sides. This is what’s done below:

The trouble is that it seems impossible to glue opposite sides without stretching the square we started with.

Is that much harder?

It is! This no-stretching requirement corresponds to an isometry.

It’s impossible to bend a sheet of paper into a sphere, or into a potato chip. This is because of the curvatures of these shapes. And the classical smooth donut-like torus is highly curved too, so it’s impossible to bend the flat Netwalk world into that classical torus. An isometric bending of the Netwalk world requires to transform it into an non-curved torus!

Hummm… I’m now beginning to think it’s impossible to bend a square into a torus!

You’re not the only one! 60 years ago, most mathematicians even thought it was impossible! But no one could prove it. In fact, when deeply annoyed by his young, brilliant and pretentious colleague, MIT mathematician Ambrose Warren rashly retorted to him: “If you’re so good, why don’t you solve the [100-year-old isometric] embedding problem for manifolds“, which the bending of the Netwalk world with no stretching is an example of. Warren was hoping it would thereby keep his colleague busy for the rest of his life. But shortly later, that colleague was claiming he had solved it!

Mathematically, an embedding is an injective map of a manifold into some larger space, typically Rⁿ, where n is at strictly greater than the dimension of the manifold. This map needs to be an immersion, which means that its derivatives (which are linear applications) must always be injective.

Who was that colleague?

He was the founder of game theory, future winner of a Nobel prize in economics and future hero of the movie A Beautiful Mind… John Forbes Nash.

And he immediately solved a 100-year-old problem?

Not really… As I said, the young Nash was a pretentious douchebag. After all, he had just completed a revolutionary 28-page PhD thesis, and he was visibly smarter than most of his colleagues. So, he figured out that only a prestigious problem was worthy of his time. One that would mark History. So, to test whether the isometric embedding problem was of that kind, Nash looked at the reactions of his colleagues as he told them he had cracked it. And surely enough, it seemed that solving the isometric embedding would mark History. So, Nash decided to give it a try.

Did Nash actually solve it?

Amazingly, he did! Nash might have been showy, he’s also definitely a world-class mathematician.

So what’s the answer? Can a square be bent into a torus?

The answer is yes. It can. Sort of…

So, as it turned out, Nash proved that we could, provided the bent torus had an infinite number of points on which acceleration could not be defined!

What does that mean?

Here’s an illustration of what that means. Imagine a skater rolling down a slope:

In the first case, there is a huge discontinuity in the slope at the green point. In some sense, the slope cannot be defined at that point. In the third case, the slope is so smooth that the skater doesn’t feel anything special at this point. Finally, and most interestingly, in the second case, at the green point, the skater will suddenly feel a force acting on him which was not here before. Nash proved that this second case must happen at an infinite amount of times on the bent torus.

Mathematically, this second case corresponds to the green point having no second derivative.

Nash’s claim means that Newton’s laws of mechanics would have no sense in the bent torus on an infinite amount of points, kind of like general relativity no longer makes sense at singularities better known as black holes!

Waw! That sounds sick! And hard to imagine!

I know! In fact, it was so sick that Nash couldn’t provide an example of a bent square torus! His proof was not constructive. He merely showed that there must be a way to bend a square into a torus, but didn’t say how…

Weirdly enough, it’s much easier to imagine a bent torus for which acceleration is undefinable everywhere.

Really? That sounds so weird…

To understand what that could mean, let’s look at some other sick geometrical objects: Non-differentiable continuous curves.

Do you mean curves which are continuous everywhere but differentiable nowhere? Is that even possible?

First examples of such curves were given in the 19th century. They were called monsters. I guess that, Historically, one of the first examples of a monster was that of the function $\sum 2^{n}\cos(4^{n}x)$. But the more popular example nowadays is the Koch snowflake.

Oh! So this is what fractals are: Non-differentiable continuous curves!

Exactly! And it took another genius to unveil the magic of fractal geometry. This genius is Benoît Mandelbrot.

Curiously though, Mandelbrot’s ideas weren’t popular at first. His first papers on this new kind of geometry were so unusual that the mathematical community rejected them. Referees claimed that the papers, despite displaying pretty images, did not contain actual mathematics. Because the community was not ready for his new ideas, Mandelbrot decided to write a book on his own. This best-seller was so amazing that it quickly became iconic, not just for young mathematicians, but in popular culture as well!

Now, the thing with fractals is that it’s very easy to make a shape of any length. For instance, you can draw a “curve” that looks exactly like a circle, but actually has a length of 4.

So, following Mandelbrot’s ideas, it’s not too hard to imagine a torus whose lengths perfectly match that of the Netwalk world. In other words, through a fractal process, it’s (at least theoretically) possible to describe a simple procedure to fold the square of the Netwalk world into an origami torus-like “zigfinihedron” which glues opposite sides.

So why did it take 5 years to actually construct it?

Look carefully… The Hévéa Torus is not a zigfinihedron! What the Hévéa team was searching for was a smoother bending of the torus, which, although had no second derivatives, still had continuous tangent planes at all points! And the trouble of fractals is that they are precisely rough objects with no such continuous tangent planes…

So why did you bring that up?

Somehow we need a trade off, between the smoothness of classical surfaces and the roughness of fractals. This trade off is what the Hévéa team called smooth fractals.

The idea of smooth fractals isn’t far from what was hinted at by John Nash. His embedding theorem stated that if a manifold could be topologically embedded in a higher dimension space, as we have done it for the Netwalk world, then this embedding could be smoothly corrugated to end up isometric, while having tangent planes at all points. What’s more, Nash proved that the amplitudes of the corrugations could be as small as we wanted.

Technically, Nash still required a C¹ continuity, which means that tangent spaces must vary continuously. Moreover, the initial embedding needs to be a shrinking of the manifold. Furthermore, Nash only proved this result, provided that the dimension of the manifold was 2 smaller than the dimension of the space it was embedded in (and it would thus not work for our torus). The refinement to all embeddings is due to Nicolaas Kuiper, and is known as the Nash-Kuiper theorem. Finally, Nash also proved a C^k isometric embedding theorem, which says that we can still embed a manifold even with greater continuities, provided the higher space we embed our manifold in is of much greater dimension.

So, following Nash and Mandelbrot’s ideas, the Hévéa team has added several layers of corrugation to a classical torus embedding. This is what’s illustrated below, where the 3 first layers have been added sequentially:

Note: This looks similar to the UPA/superstring: "Bubbles in koilon", Whorl and Whorls in UPA.

Let’s have a closer look!

The Hévéa Torus is theoretically obtained by adding an infinite amount of such corrugations. But, computationally, the Hévéa team merely added 5 layers, as any greater layer would in fact be imperceptible given the resolution of the image.

But, is the Hévéa Torus really a Netwalk world with no stretching?

That’s hard to verify… but yes. Below is an image which displays the correspondence between lines in the Netwalk world and lines in the Hévéa Torus:

Amazingly, the black and green loops actually have the same lengths in both figures. Granted, it’s a bit less obvious on the Hévéa Torus, but that’s because the black loop has a more fractal-like structure, which makes it longer than it seems to be!

Wait… Is the Hévéa Torus really smooth?

Yes! The key to obtain the smoothness of our corrugated torus is to have the amplitudes of successive corrugations decreasing faster than their “wavelengths”.

By carefully adjusting the faster decrease of amplitudes of successive corrugations, the Hévéa team managed to guarantee the C¹ continuity of the Hévéa Torus!

I’m not sure this convinces me…

One way to see that is to take the shape of the black loop of the figure above (which corresponds to a meridian), in the 3D space the Hévéa Torus is embedded in. Let’s compare that to a Koch snowflake.

Importantly, as opposed to the non-differentiable Koch snowflake, the meridian of the Hévéa Torus is still smooth enough to have (continuous) tangents at all points.

Now, the result of the Hévéa project is a spectacular achievement of over 160 years of mathematical pondering. Obviously, this article only mentions the few mathematicians who made the most stunning breakthroughs in this investigation. But, unfortunately, it also dramatically fails to account for the hundreds of other mathematicians who have shaped and reshaped our intuitions of curves and surfaces, in a deeper but less obvious fashion. For me, this amazing silent build up is the source of the magic of mathematics. Think about it. Thanks to many unsung mathematicians, we now have in front of our eyes an object that the great Gauss, Riemann, Nash and Mandelbrot couldn’t even imagine, even though they had been searching for it all along. I hope you feel privileged and dismayed by the following precious images of the Hévéa Torus…

I should say that even though combining Nash and Mandelbrot’s ideas sound reasonably doable, it is actually a huge and difficult endeavor. Once again, the Hévéa team had to spend 5 years to come up with the Hévéa Torus, after several unsuccessful attempts. It was a tedious and tricky work, which involved very modern mathematics, including and especially Mikhaïl Gromov’s homotopy principle. This gives me one last occasion to stress how big an achievement the conception of the Hévéa Torus is. Congrats to the Hévéa team!

Toroidal Symmetries and Fractal Divisions

Noodling around with a protractor, bisecting circles into smaller circles to make them into toroids. Along the way, the 2-D drawing displays beautiful symmetries of various kinds.

I can see toroids all over this drawing, but you may only be seeing the circles.

Here I've used the Paint program to highlight the largest torus in this drawing, which shows up if you imagine this as a cross-section of a sphere. The blue lines show the cross section of the torus cutaway. This inner torus has been subdivided again into two smaller tori (darker blue circles). The vertical yellow lines are the poles; the longest pole is for the central torus; the two shorter lines are the poles of the two subdivided tori. You can go on subdividing each torus this way, each time dividing the cutaway of the torus into half-sized tori.

This torus and its poles was used to illustrate "the great square within the torus." Same view as the blue lined cutaway above.

The darkest blue circles represent how the torus is dividing fractally. Each torus cross section can divide into two more.

Notice the interesting way this fractal division works. It will go on forever, larger and larger or smaller and smaller, in true fractal manner.

Usually when I've thought about multiply-linked tori, they appear to nest at a single center pole, like Russian dolls. But these new drawings show how the tori can divide fractally along different lines.

The Simple Explanation has also used nesting toroids to illustrate chakras.

A little more fooling around in Paint gives us a "quasi torus" in the vertical direction (yellow).

Here I've used the poles to define a quasi torus perpendicular to the blue set. Following the logic of the Simple Explanation, I don't really think the tori divide up and down like this, along the poles, since the poles represent time and motion rather than space. I think the tori only divide in the horizontal (blue) space. But here we can see that this structure has room for a fully symmetrical set of divisions in the vertical (yellow) dimension.

WSM and black (w)hole

A black (w)hole is a vortex of energy wave spectrum that connects into multiple other dimensions within the Universal time space matrix through the spiral geometry and all these vortexing energy points merging in higher dimensions to form the singularity, a black hole singularity is an infinitely dense point of vortexing energy and the surface of the point is vibrating and when you "enter" the vibrating surface you change dimension and location, the vibrating surface is like a vibrating (string tunnel) wormhole, this singularity point is actually impossible to access, the infinitely dense vortexing energy is a zero-point. When the black (w)hole has a negative volume it would then be vibrating energy expanding outward in the form of a torus, the negative volume would also form a point in the center of the torus which would be a zero-point, these zero-points join together and form the flower of life/tetrahedron grid fractal structure and the field/sea of energy, the torus that expands/fractals is vibrating energy and the inner torus is the superstring(energy loop) and the expanding torus expands out of the zero-point. This expanding vibrating energy torus can be split up into 3 main toruses/levels, the inner one would correspond to the structure multidimensional polygon(MP) and forms the structure of the superstring and therefore its vibration/what particle it is, the middle one would correspond to the vibrational dimension MP and the border where the structure MP and vibrational dimension MP merges is the geometry of the tetrahedron grid encoding/encasing the vibrational dimensions, the outer torus is what people would know as "particles are waves" which is its own MP and is formed out of the structure MP and is the vibration of the superstring and maybe the vibrational dimension MP is formed out of the merger of the borders of the structure MP and the "particles are waves" MP.

The merger of the structure MP and the wave("particles are waves") MP forming the vibrational dimension MP forms something interesting, the 10 spacetime dimensions merged with the 12 vibrational dimensions allowing us to form 12 spacetime dimensions like in theory of thought, and this explains/forms the 10:12 tree of life/3D 10 tree of life structure, because 4 spacetime dimensions, of the 12 spacetime dimensions, are required to form waves/tetractys=1+2+3+4=10/hexagonal yod=12 and this shows there can be 12 main frequencies/vibrational dimensions, the expanding toruses/spheres are formed out of the doubling sequence(spiral geometry)/tetrahedron grid fractal(Isotropic Vector Matrix) which is formed out of the 10:12 tree of life and is therefore how vibrational dimensions fractal out of/encase each other and this explains how the inner structure(two inner toruses) work. The vibrational dimensions are (energy) fields(/membranes) so they are fields containing and contained in fields, the "last" contained fields are the particle/quantum fields and energy is given to these quantum field which causes a spherical(/torus) ripple in the field and this ripple, an expanding torus/sphere, is a particle, the energy given to the field is torus/loop shaped(energy loop/superstring) and I suggest its light energy since light becomes matter.

The spatially entangled vertices from PhOENIX theory of everything remind me of Tetryonics which can probably be linked into it and therefore theory of thought (and quantum atom theory(Dyslexic artist on YouTube)) can maybe link into it anyway these spatially entangled vertices are probably vertices of the (fractaling) tetrahedron (grid)(xen particle) in Tetryonics which is a partiki, the fractaling tetrahedron grid is the E8 torus so the energy loop(superstring) causing the ripple in fields is the fractaling E8 tetrahedron grid.

The vibration of the superstring/torus causes 3D ripples in the sea of energy and these ripples are the expanding toruses, the expanding torus/sphere looks quite similar to the Wave Structure of Matter(WSM).

My E8 F4 projection and so called "Sacred Geometry"

Please note, this is about the GEOMETRY used in what has come to be called “Sacred Geometry”. As it stands, the so-called “sacred” origin of these, including the pentagon that shows up in the icosahedral/dodecahedral Platonic solids due to the Sqrt(5) Golden Ratio (Phi) relationship within my E8 to H4 folding. I am merely pointing out that E8 contains the geometry that many find “interesting” for whatever reason.

My E8 F4 projection w/blue triality edges and physics particle assignments:

My E8 F4 projection with 6720 edge lines:

My E8 F4 projection rectified:

Star Of David Overlay:

Metatron’s Cube Overlay:

Flower of Life Overlay:

Kabbalah Tree of Life Overlay:

10thdim: E8

As we continue to add dimensions, the orthogonal hypercube projections that we're looking at here with each new dimension become increasingly ornate, and (dare I say it) more mandala-like.

Another eight-dimensional shape that we've looked at with this project is Garrett Lisi's E8 Rotation. In late 2007 a new theory deriving the basic forces and particles of our universe from an E8 matrix received favorable attention. Lisi created a huge stir in the physics world with a new proposal for what he calls An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything that uses "E8" - a complex, eight-dimensional pattern with 248 points.

As visually appealing as this shape (pictured below) might be, its implications are startling: Lisi has demonstrated that there is a way to place the various forces and elementary particles (including their possible quantum spin values) on E8's 248 points. Rotating Lisi's model in various ways reveals the explanation for a variety of interactions, some of which (like the clustering of quarks into families of three) are natural outcomes from this structure. Some points in his model are currently occupied by particles which have been theorized but which have yet to be seen, and there is hope that the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland may some day reveal some of those particles.

Whether Garrett Lisi's theory proves the existence of higher dimensions or not is open to interpretation - Lisi himself says this geometric pattern, although it is based upon an 8 dimensional construct, could be fully realized within our 4D space-time without requiring additional dimensions. On the other hand, in a New Scientist magazine article, string theorist Sabine Hossenfelder (of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics) points out that this could be complimentary to string theory, which she says also uses E8 to describe the Calabi-Yau manifold, the extra-dimensional shape that string theorists says our universe is derived from.

Lisi also acknowledges that this is not a finished theory but a work in progress, and that there are still some deficiencies in his model that need further refinement. For me, this dimensional connection is fascinating because with this project I've insisted that you can't have any physical expressions of matter in anything beyond the 8th dimension.

A commonly asked question about this project is, "if our universe and every other universe can be thought of as "points", or perhaps "positions" within a multiverse landscape, and in this way of visualizing the dimensions we get to that landscape by the time we're at the seventh dimension, then why do we need to think about any more dimensions beyond that?

To my way of thinking, you can express the same concern about every definition of every single dimension, and the arguments have to keep coming back to "what are we missing within this current dimension?".

For instance, people say that the third spatial dimension is really all you need, because no matter what other universe you imagine it should have a third dimensional expression.

Or there are people who say all we need is space-time, because by the time you have the third dimension plus time, which gives the third dimension a way to change from state to state, then you can imagine every single possible universe strung end to end within infinite space-time, and because that string of possible states is infinite you will eventually get to every possible universe.

Or you can have people who say space-time plus its probabilistic outcomes (which Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation says are "orthogonal" or "at right angles" to space-time, leading to my conclusion that these branches are in the fifth dimension) gives you everything you need to imagine every possible universe.

From there, I've proposed that the branches for our universe which no amount of chance or choice will allow us to select (like the branches where dinosaurs never became extinct or the ones where I died in a car accident last year) are in the sixth dimension, and this uses the same logical reasoning that defines any spatial dimension - there always needs to be a "new degree of freedom" added for us to be able to call what we're talking about a new dimension, and the new dimension allows us to get to something that was unavailable from the previous dimensions.

Likewise, I've proposed that those other universes with different basic physical laws are located in other positions within the seventh dimension and above, and this is why our universe, constrained at its position within that multiverse landscape never "wanders off" into one of those other universes.

So, why isn't the seventh dimension as far as we need to go? We have to continue with the logic we've used from the outset. Imagine a point of infinite size in the sixth dimension, and it's much the same as imagining the indeterminate point we started from with our thought experiment - the point encompasses the whole dimension. If we can think of a different point that is not subsumed by the first point, then the point-line-plane postulate tells us we've found a way to get to the "next dimension up": those two points define a line in the seventh dimension.

What if the second point we just imagined represents a universe where the strength of gravity is different from ours? Then the line that passes through those two points is like a one-dimensional line, and that line extends through all possible values for gravity. Different positions on that line would include "impossible" universes which could not have come into existence because the strength of gravity was above or below a certain threshold needed to allow a physical universe to express itself, and such imaginary universes might be at many places along the line, interspersed with universes that were able to cohere into more organized states.

What about a universe with a different value for the speed of light (or whatever physical constant you care to imagine)? That's not on the line we just drew. We could erase the other point we drew, then place a new point for a universe with a different speed of light, and the new line that passes through those two points would be all possible realities resulting from different values for the speed of light.

But what if I want to consider both lines simultaneously? It can't be done without entering the next dimension up, the eighth dimension. So with the logic of the point-line-plane postulate we have a way of thinking of the eighth dimension as being like a plane, and our universe can be viewed as a point in the eighth dimension with those two lines or any other lines representing other different-initial-conditions universe passing through our point within that plane.

Remember this: with the point-line-plane postulate, the point you start from is in dimension x, the line to a different point is in dimension x+1, and the plane defined by a third point not on that line is in dimension x+2. Having worked through three dimensions, nothing moves or changes about the first point, we are just adding dimensions that allow us to view that starting point from different perspectives. Thinking of our universe as a "largest possible point" encompassing the phase space of the sixth dimension, then, doesn't mean that we can't view that unchanging point from the widening perspective of the seventh or eighth dimension.  Quite the contrary: this logic is the accepted approach to visualizing spatial dimensions. Likewise, the idealized shapes we've started each of these entries with (like the octeract at the start of this entry) have an underlying symmetry, where each of the points are equidistant to their adjacent ones in the same way that the adjacent points of a 3D cube are equidistant when viewed within the third dimension. This means that the 8D octeract, like any of the other hypercube shapes, can be placed within a hypersphere with the same number of dimensions, and the outer points of the hypercube are pushed apart from the center of the hypersphere symmetrically: the point of indeterminate size can become a sphere occupying as little or as much of the dimension it's placed within. At its largest possible expression, this point becomes a finite but unbounded hypersphere occupying the entire phase space of the dimension it's within. We can also look at the other Platonic Solids we've been looking at here with this same idea of symmetric points pushed out from a central position in mind, and this includes shapes like the nested tetrahedra, which can be used to create the dodecahedron.

Speaking of phase space, all possible universes could be contained within an eight-dimensional phase space. To follow the logic we've been pursuing here, the six-dimensional phase space for our own universe (or any specific universe with locked-in physical laws) would be a subset of an eight-dimensional phase space that encompasses all possible universes. Likewise, it's worth noting that Everett didn't limit his Theory of the Universal Wavefunction to just our unique universe: so while the phase space of a unique different-initial-conditions universe such as ours could be encompassed by the sixth dimension, the logic we've followed here shows us that Everett's theory ultimately should be considered from the phase space of the eighth dimension to include the wave function of all those other possible universes.

"Spin" ties together with Triality, Garrett Lisi's E8 rotation, Dan Winter's fractal compression/decompression, Nassim Haramein's point-based physics, and Marko Rodin's Rodin Coil. Could all of these different approaches be related?

If these claims are supportable by hard math, then we may be looking here at a way of harnessing the Information Equals Reality paradigm I've been promoting throughout the life of this project.

How does the concept of infinite division relate to my approach to visualizing the dimensions? The answer is encoded into the logo I created for my project: at the core of this is the point we start with (the zero) and the point we end with (the ten), and those are connected. All of the other dimensions represent ways of dividing up the information that becomes reality, and so are shown in this graphic to be revolving around or "outside" the conceptual line which connects those starting and ending points. Those points, by virtue of being of indeterminate size, are really equivalent, but it's helpful to think of the zero as representing the drive towards division down to the infinitesimally small, and the ten as representing the drive towards encompassing the infinitely large "point" of the Omniverse.

Ultimately all of that information exists as potential within the beautifully balanced symmetry state that exists both before and after our universe or any other information set. So, if all possible states already exist and we are each merely observing infinitely dividable "slices" from instant to instant, is it possible for us to sense the future?

There are two additional dimensions beyond space-time which can be described as "time-like". Sound familiar? This is one way of describing the first six dimensions of my "new way of thinking about time and space". Elie Cartan's "triality" symbol pictured here ties into the idea that Sparling's three time-like dimensions can be rotated into a single point (three becomes one), which can be thought of as a "null" or "zero" created by the perfectly balanced symmetry inherent within triality.

Interestingly, triality also connects to Garrett Lisi's E8 rotation.

According to the June 2010 issue of Scientific American, there's renewed excitement about Twistor Theory and String Theory being united by the highly respected theoretical physicist Ed Witten. It appears to me that this will all tie into the work of Marko Rodin, whose Rodin Coil is pictured at right.

After I published my look at the dodecahedron last week, Dan sent me this note: Nice to have a general intro there. Now you need to add this simple essential statement: after the limited number of axes of rotation which can be contained in cubic lattice (3D),the ONLY way rotating axes of charge can be superposed WITH the necessary constructive wave interference is the way a (5) cube rotates into a dodecahedron, the so called hypercube producing the golden ratio edge is the ONLY next dimension... 4 there. Then by ratcheting that down a helix - precisely mapping dna you have the 5 axes of rotation superposed (5D). Recursive braiding adds spin axes superposed (and longer wavelengths) to that, where thus DNA is the only biologic structure with access to 10+ dimensions. The 7 / 5 spin is the essential symmetry recipe (slip knot) of hydrogen, heart muscle and solar core, as well as dna.

On Dan's goldenproof page, he ties the golden ratio in not just with the Poincaré Dodecahedral Space, but with other topics we've looked at in the last year or two: Garrett Lisi's E8 rotation, which is a bold framework for showing how all the possible particles and forces of our universe are organized, and which Dan explains also incorporates the golden ratio. On the same page Dan also relates his work to the ideas of Nassim Haramein. I've remarked before that Nassim is fond of dismissing ideas of extra dimensions (including his insistence that the first and second dimension don't exist), which could seem to tell us that his ideas are completely incompatible with mine. Nassim tells us that there is only one dimension, and that our observed universe is connected by "points" to all other realities by fractal patterns that can be infinitely divided or infinitely expanded. Where would such an idea tie in to what we're talking about here? In the fifth dimension, which I've been saying all along is really where our reality is defined, one planck frame at a time, to create the fourth-dimensional "line of time" we look back upon from our vantage point as creatures made of 3D atoms and molecules.

The June 14 2008 issue of New Scientist Magazine has an article about the award-winning work of mathematicians John Thompson and Jacques Tits, who have offered some mind-expanding proofs about how our amazing universe is derived from symmetries in the higher dimensions. This idea is related to Garrett Lisi's eight-dimensional E8 symmetry group, which I've referred to a number of times in this blog, and which I believe ties back into my project as well: by the time you have imagined an Omniverse which expresses all possible patterns of mass and energy, there is an equilibrium state where all of those possible patterns enfold back into a balance, where everything fits together into a perfect symmetry, which is the natural underlying state. Our universe is defined by higher dimensional patterns which give it its unique laws of physics and its breathtaking intricacy, right from the quarks and neutrinos up to the universe as a whole and all of its possible "spacetime tree" of expressions. In that sense, our cosmos is just a temporary deviation which has been set in motion by the breaking of that symmetry, and our line of time is a return to that perfectly balanced zero which existed before our universe began and which we'll return to after our universe has run its course.

Because we are made out of 3D atoms and molecules, each higher spatial dimension is increasingly difficult for us to visualize. Like the hypercube, we can look at other visualization tools that help us to imagine those higher dimensional shapes, and the Calabi-Yau manifold is a good example of that. Garrett Lisi's E8 rotation may well be another, as it contends that all of the forces and particles within our universe are derived from an 8 dimensional matrix. My way of visualizing reality could be a way for us to imagine how our 3D physical reality is derived from vibrating superstrings in the ten dimensions: but as I have always tried to make clear, my unique way of imagining the dimensions is not the proof for superstrings, it just has many interesting tie-ins.

String theorists say that for us the fifth dimension and above are curled up down at the planck length. This is why I talk about the 2D creature on the mobius strip, twisting and turning in the dimensions above but from his experience he is just traveling in a straight line. We 3D creatures feel like we're traveling down a straight line of time in the fourth dimension, but that line is being constructed one planck length after another from probabilistic outcomes available to us as a result of chance and choice in the fifth dimension. Let me say that again: we are really twisting and turning in the fifth dimension, but we think we're traveling on a straight line in the fourth dimension. This can be related to Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, which says we are merely observing one state out of many possible states, all of which are contained within the quantum wavefunction: the many other versions of the universe where you and I made other choices continue to exist as potential within the multiverse. I'm proposing that those other outcomes are just different fifth-dimensional twists and turns.

What I'm portraying here is a way of visualizing the higher dimensions that ties together many different schools of thought: quantum mechanics and Everett's Many Worlds Interpretation are at the core, but there are many other possible tie-ins. String theorists say our universe is created by the interaction of a 3D brane and a 7D brane, my way of visualizing says that our 3D-universe-and-all-of-its-possible-timelines is locked in at the seventh dimension. Is our universe as we witness it just shadows of higher-dimensional holograms, a concept proposed by physicist Juan Maldacena as an extension to string theory? Whether our perceived reality is the shadows of superstrings, or a hologram, or an E8 rotation, or many other possible explanations, remains to be proved.

Time as we experience it is just a shadow of what's really happening: just like the image of a hypercube being projected on a flat computer screen, we are looking at shadows cast by higher dimensional shapes as we go from instant to instant in our 3D universe.

As simple as E8 may be, I've been trying to visualize something even simpler here. Personally, I have long been a fan of the idea of helix shapes derived from stacked dodecahedrons, and the implied six degrees of separation concept within that idea. I was surprised to learn from the article I'm referring to in New Scientist magazine, then, that Garrett Lisi has also been using G2 rotations, a hexagon-based system which is a subset of E8. Apparently G2 can be used, for instance, to describe the relationship between quarks, antiquarks, and gluons.

Note: Quantum atom theory(Dyslexic artist on YouTube) can be derived from 10thdim's "Imagining the 10th dimension" theory because (past and) future timelines and (therefore) other universes exist in higher dimensions so the higher/extra dimensions are "future possibilities" which are the "symmetry of the sphere breaking" which is the universe multiplying, by dividing, forming two timelines, which are the faces of a higher dimensional shape. In quantum atom theory, time is created by the emission of photons which, in xen qabbalah, is actually all of existence being made of light/energy where the past(memories) is [light/energy] turned into information which is saved in the energy and spirally compressed into the "singularity"(energy), where the spiral is the breaking of the symmetry of the sphere, which would be seen as light((/)photons)/energy, that makes up existence, being emitted from past (/) energy/information.

Quantum atom theory: Time-wave

Due to the uncertain geometry, because of the superposition, of spacetime on quantum levels, spacetime becomes a chaotic geometry and therefore becomes a fractal(chaos theory), making spacetime a spacetime foam made up of black-white holes, and entropy is the arrow of time, really a spiral, so as entropy increases the fractaling of spacetime(membrane) increases and spirally(because it spins) compresses into the (quantum) singularit-y(/ies), causing energy to be more equally distributed. Since each part of the fractal is a sephirot, because it's a tetrahedron grid fractal, and since all sephirot(dimensions) are nested, and therefore contained, within each other(,which forms Da'at because there all unified into one,) (which is caused by) and (causes) the dimensions loop that means the time wave/spiral spirals around the torus/loop and is divided up into (the) 12 cycles (of the zodiac) which correspond to one of the 12 gods energies. This is why there are two timelines per dimension because the two timelines are the two spirals of the geometry of [space]time which is a torus.

Note: The 12 vibrational dimensions are the hexagonal yod of the 10 spacetime dimensions each vibrational dimension therefore has a timeline and the higher vibrational dimensions have future timelines. Time is formed out of the fractaling tetractys/tetrahedron so the bigger the tetractys the higher the dimension and the further in time the dimension is because time is faster, these levels of tetractys correspond to time numbers. There are infinite universes because all choices happen, the multiverse "theory", so all infinite possibilities can happen which all exist at once so there all already determined since they all exist. All these parallel realities co-exist in the same space and time but there existing on slightly different frequency levels of energy with a thin membrane separating them. Kabbalah reduces this infinity to 22 realities(Realities: Ones we are consciously connected to and aware of. Timelines.) Note: Quantum atom theory(Dyslexic artist on YouTube) can be derived from 10thdim's "Imagining the 10th dimension" theory because (past and) future timelines and (therefore) other universes exist in higher dimensions so the higher/extra dimensions are "future possibilities" which are the "symmetry of the sphere breaking" which is the universe multiplying, by dividing, forming two timelines, which are the faces of a higher dimensional shape. In quantum atom theory, time is created by the emission of photons which, in xen qabbalah, is actually all of existence being made of light/energy where the past(memories) is [light/energy] turned into information which is saved in the energy and spirally compressed into the "singularity"(energy), where the spiral is the breaking of the symmetry of the sphere, which would be seen as light((/)photons)/energy, that makes up existence, being emitted from past (/) energy/information.

The time spiral enters and is turned, causing it to spiral, by, the heaven that surrounds the Empyrean, the Primum Mobile where all the information is extracted from it, wiping it clean, and inputted into the akashic records which is, the information (field) encoded in the energy field and, the psychic dimension/singularity, where all dimensions/energy (field(s)) merge into one, which is the part of the singularity that makes up (and (therefore) is) the 4th dimension because the 4th dimension is built on and is the basis for all other dimensions because it is (formed out of) the tetractys shaped flower of life(hexagon)=1+2+3+4 which forms/is wave(spiral)s which exist because of time which is apart of spacetime which is the 4th dimension meaning the time spiral is (the) 4th dimension(()al()).

Time-wave

The ripples of space-time that emerge from the source spread out into the universe and then return to the source, completing a cyclical cycle. Within this cycle, there exists a "Time-Wave Template" that follows universal rules. Let's examine this Time-Wave Template, remembering that it applies universally, from the scale of the vast universe to the microscopic scale of creation.

The energy wave generated from the point of occurrence of an event spreads out through space-time in the shape of a sphere. The moment an event is created, matter manifests on one side, and antimatter-spirit with an opposite energy relationship is formed on the opposite side. This causes two energy balloons to spread out in opposite directions simultaneously. This is called the "Event Horizon" or "Veca."

The line along which these two Vecas occur is called a 'probability vector line' . Two Vecas exist as a pair in one vector line.

The vector body is divided into the material world's 'EtorA System' and the spiritual world's 'AdorA System' centered around the center.

The 'EtorA System' and the 'AdorA System' overlap in the same space, but they have opposite particle spins and are balanced by the matter-antimatter relationship.

As the two separate, the 'Original Blueprint' on the Manifest side separates towards the Spirit side, and conversely, the 'Original Blueprint' on the Spirit side separates towards the Material side. Therefore, from the perspective of the Adorey Spirit, it sees itself as the Material body (Manifest), and the Material body of the opposite material universe appears in a relationship with the Adorey Spirit body (Spirit).

The body within the event horizon is also called the 'Hara Body' , and is divided into three types of 'Hara Bodies'. The body that is manifested as matter is called the 'KaLE Hara Body', the body that is separated towards spirit is called the 'Mahara Reisha Body' , and the body when the two are combined is called the 'HarA Krysta Body' . The 'Hara Krysta' body that has both probabilities is also called the 'Heroic Probability' .

Harabadi acts as a boundary between the probabilistic reality that appears in your holographic experience world.

Within one 'Vector', there are seven 'Bodies', one set on each side of the four 'Bodies' that appear in the expansion cycle and three sets on the return cycle, plus one set that appears when gathered in the center, for a total of 15 'Bodies'. At the center of each of the 15 bodies within one vector is a projection sun, and all of these together are called the 'Eiradhona Vector Body' . The 3D planets are projected into the holographic universe by the 3D projector 'Sun', and during one vector projection cycle, the 15 suns support the step-by-step holographic projection.

There is an expansion cycle in which events that originate in the center gradually unfold outward, and when they reach the outermost outer creation, they undergo a 'transfiguration' and then enter a return cycle in which they return to the center.

Creation is projected through four stages from the inside out: core → inside → middle → outside. This is called the projection domain.

The breathing cycle of inhalation and exhalation is proportional to the size of the body, and our universe repeats very long breathing cycles as shown below.

(One Time-Wave Cycle returning to the source after expansion = 1728 x 2 x Time Vector)

Each stage of the cycle and body has its own unique name.

Note the similarity in number and names to the Hindu Yuga cycle, which references the same source text. Each cycle has its own unique name for each stage.

Since we'll be seeing many overlapping circles in the future, let's examine them step by step to avoid confusion. The ideal template for a time wave would be to spread out along 12 evenly spaced "probability domains." Therefore, we'll begin with the following circular arrangement.

One Haravadi drawn on one of the 'Event Horizon' domain lines is called one 'Veca' time line.

The addition of the spiritual side 'Veca' that occurs on the opposite side is called one 'Vector' time line.

Six 'vector' timelines come together to form one 'time continuum', which is called a 'time-wave template' made up of six vectors.

The 'Time-Wave Template' consists of 12 outer 'Hara Cells' and 6 central 'Hara Cells'.

Let's remember this 'template' well, as it will begin to form a structure at scale.

Within the template of the time wave, there are three layers formed by four outer Haravadis and two central Haravadis grouped together along vertical vector lines, which are called the 'KEi-Ti Membrane' .

Once you can bring all three layers together in the center, the 'Bud' located in the center will begin to open.

The lotus-shaped 'bud' (Bud) that appears in Buddhism signifies the 'lotus-shaped energy radiation pattern' (Budding) that appears when energy is exchanged within a central point connected to the source.

The sphere with the central flower bud open is called a 'HaRA Krysta Bud Cell' .

Four 'Time-Wave Templates' aligned on six vector lines overlap to form one 'Cosmic Matrix' , which is called the 'ElumEir'-adhona Spirit Body' .

The 'Illumiadona Spirit Body' has 72 'Hara Cells', consisting of 48 on the outside and 24 in the center.

Imagine our multiverse breathing in and out, constantly expanding and contracting.

The universe is composed of layers of invisible, spherical energy bubbles (Sphere within Sphere). The Illumiadona Spirit Body corresponds to our "Foundation of the Structured Bubble Cosmos," which is made up of bubble structures.

When the twelve are rotated and overlapped again along the axis of the side view of the 'ElumEir'-adhona Spirit Body' , a 'Cosmos Body' with 864 probabilistic domain haravas is created.

Cosmos is the largest 'multidimensional material structure' (Matter-Spirit Body) that the material universe can manifest.

But the size of our universe does not end here. There are 'meta-structures' where multiple 'cosmos' are organized into specific forms to form one gigantic 'intelligence', and this is where the 'Reuche Krist Cross' formation introduced in the ' Kathara Grid ' reappears.

The twelve 'Cosmos Matrices' that form the 'Reuche Monadic Configuration' are called the 'Cos-MĀ'-yah Cluster' .

'Reuche' refers to the twelve pillars of energy called 'Scepters' that appear in a cross arrangement in the final stage of 'Eckasha' as the ' Kathara Grid ' becomes more advanced.

The final appearance of the 'Cos-MĀ'-yah Cluster', made up of 12 'Cosmos', is as follows.

The shape in the middle is the Elemental Step-down Aah-JhA Body Atomic Generator derived from the Mix Master diagram, the Allur-E'ah Ra-sha-tan Code.

But our universe doesn't stop there…

The seven 'Cos-MĀ'-yah's come together to form 'Cos-MY'ah' .

Note that there is another small 'CosMY'ah' in the middle. This is specifically called 'Cos-Min-Yahas' , and it signifies the first 8 Cell Cluster that appeared when the universe was born in the beginning. The '7 Perpetual Suns' of the Inner Creation and the invisible '8th Sun' (the 8th Hidden Sun of Cos-Min-Yahas) are located right here.

Yes! We have finally reached the practical structure that leads to the "Eternal Internal Creation."

The four 'CosMY'ah's' come together to form the 'Ahu-Stri'-yah Jha'-TU' 'Pre-substance Consciousness Field'.

The outer four 'CosMY'ah' are called the 'Percepts Domain', and the middle one is called 'Ahu-Stri'-yah Ta-hu'.

These five realms govern the five 'Pre-Substance PLASM States'.

1. Pure Plasm (cool, crystalline Eta-Ur)
2. Endoplasm (warm liquid heated vapor Eta-Ur)
3. Thermoplasm (electrified heat vapor Eta-Ur)
4. Hydroplasm (liquid-gel Eta-Ur)
5. Ectoplasm (gossamer-thread-crystallized Eta-Ur)

The three 'Ahu-Stri'-yah Jha'-TU's' come together to form the final stage, the 'EFFI' (Eternal First Field Intelligence) structure.

'EFFI', composed of three 'Ahu-Stri'-yah Jha'-TU, signifies the collective intelligence that arose at the beginning of the birth of the great universe and continues to exist.

Take a look at the Tri-Veca the Holy Trinity structure of 'EFFI'.

The 'Ahu-Stri'-yah Jha'-TU', which split into two, is repeating the great breath of coming together as one and then merging with the one above.

The universe, base 7, base 10, base 12 and the torus

To understand the complex cosmology of our actual universe, we have to use the tools given to us with which to measure: we have to make study of numbers, and not in a traditional sense, as facts and figures of weights and measures, of distance and duration. Instead, we must look at certain groupings that combine certain quantitites of objects or ideas. For example, we must make use of the ten sefirot emanations upon the "tree of life." So far, we have studied mainly the systems of seven and twelve, but now I mean to talk about the base ten as well.

But first let me readumbrate the base seven system. Here is how it evolved: it begins with a torus viewed from above at a forty-five degree angle. The torus is a doughnut-shaped object, and the number seven takes to it naturally in the form of its being the minimum number of surfaces that can be mapped onto the doughnut-shaped form of the torus. This is known as the "seven colour" mapping problem. The result of maping seven such contiguous areas onto the doughnut shape is a peculiar kind of spiral. We can use this spiral to measure the surface of the torus. I call this spiral "phi/pi."

Here, however, we see seven applied to the torus at 45° as a means of solving a minimum packing-space arrangement using circles to depict spheres. Generally these 7 "spheres" were associated with the seven visible planets, including the sun and moon, however, as I have already demonstrated, creating a phi spiral using the Pythagorean theorem to "square the circle" and constructing a model in 3-space from the flat, 2-D pattern, are both well documented methods of rendering that make use of the base seven system. Here it has been applied in the form of the minimum number of equal sized objects that can be packed into a torus at a 45° angle.

Now, let us introduce the idea of the ten sefirot emanations of the "tree of life" (the hypercube at antipode). If we take the torus at 45° and we turn it such that we are looking down the pole of its central hole, then the minimum number of spheres drawn as circles that can be packed into the shape of the torus would be ten. These are the ten sefirot emanations. In the Sefer Yetzirah, the Book of Formation, it describes these ten as like two clasped hands, each of four "fingers" and a central, "thumb," ring for each.

In the same way the ten sefirot emanations are here arranged in their minimum equal-sized packing array, so too is their ordering here devised as a string wrapped over, under, around and through the centre of the torus. From the tenth it connects back to the first. This sequence is meant, for the base ten array to plot the same form of phi/pii spiral as can be demonstrated with the torus for the base seven set. In the same way the phi/pi spiral defines the base seven torus, so does this sequence display the same measurement for the base ten torus.

Here is the "tree of life" diagram of ha QBLH expressed as the minimum number of spheres that can be packed to form a torus at 90°. What is special about this arrangement is that the number of points of intersection are equal to the number of "paths" (edges) on the "tree of life" (hypercube at antipode): 22. 22 is special because it is the number of letters in the Hebrew alphabet. In the Hebrew alphabet, each letter also represents an element, a planet or a constellation. There are twelve constellation letters, equivalent to the twelve consonants in Greek. There are seven planetary letters equivalent to Greek vowels. The three remaining letters, aleph (A), mem (M), and shin (S), are equivalent to Alchemical salt, sulpher and mercury, that is, combinations between the four elements. Each of the sefirot is gven its name in Hebrew. Below is Malkuth. The greater circle that connects and contains all the others, depicting a torus, is Kether.

Having now talked about the base 7 and base 10 torus shapes (at 45° and 90°), there is still one more method of this kind we can discuss (at zero or 180°). This is actually the most important method of measuring for our universe's cosmology; there are far more attributes associated with the base 12 system than both the base 7 and base 10 systems combined. Here we see the minimum packing ratio for only the ecternal ring of the torus, excluding the area of the central sphere (the hole of the doughnut). Each zodiac sign is accorded a tribe in Hebrew and an apostle of Jesus in Greek.

Here is a combination of the base 12 and base 7 systems as minimum packaging-space problems. Because the base 7 and base 12 systems have been in use since the most ancient known antiquity, there is no short supply of corresponent attributes, and only a select few have been listed here. The key for decoding them is given thus:

The reason for discussing the base 7 and 12 systems in particular is that they are considered the basic cosmological number sets of measuring attributes for studying our universe's original and current cosmology. The base 10 system is considered an addition to the basic seven of three "supernal" sefirot, considered more psychological in nature. However, though the 7 and 12 combination is more well known, we must study the combination, absent in the base 12 system, of the central sphere's overlaps. In the base 10 system we observe four outer spheres overlapping the central sphere. Likewise, in the base seven system, four overlap the central sphere.

It is in this central sphere we must look to find the engine of our universe's creation, the event that caused the "big bang." In order to see why the base 10 "tree of life" (hypercube at antipode) would factor in to the moment of our universe's very creation, let me show you some diagrams that are more to do with physics and cosmology than symbolism and mythology.

In this image, we see the base 7 (green), 10 (black) and 12 (red) systems inside a blue lattice. This blue lattice of lines and squares represents the geometry of the circles and spheres. The placement of everything remains the same, except for the base 12 system, shown as an ellipse seen at zero or 180° (flat-on), instead of as the minimum packing-space problem.

In order to study the core of our existence it is necessary to go outside of the local universe, through the multiverse, await the nulliverse, and only then by luck witness the random quantum fluctuation producing matter from anti-matter that precipitates the "big bang" at the moment of the universe's creation. This overlapping of the basic, geometric number systems with the cosmological model of universal physics (at this stage still only visualised as a light-cone), is essential to understanding both. in the central origin-point of the first baby universe inside a black hole's gravitational singularity, the "ten" come together with the "seven" in a complex confluence of forces.

The colour coding of this diagram is the same as for tau sub tau. The green signs of the zodiac here represent the same depth as the green aleph sub omega yin-yang of the tau sub tau diagram. Here, the red seven "planets" are equivalent there to the red aleph sub sigma circle, or inner-sphere of the green torus. Likewise, the blue toroid of aleph sub n, representing the singularity inside the black hole the event horizon of which is the green, outer-sphere, aleph sub omega, is equivalent to the ten sefirot array (the minimum packing space for a hypersphere at antipode).

Now, let us look at the central sphere, depicted as a circle in the above diagram, and let us study how the base seven and base ten systems (or the aleph sub sigma hypersphere and aleph sub n torus) interact as an engine of creation central to Tau sub Tau.

In this diagram, the blue lines indicate the shape of the doughnut seen from above its hole. The red spirals are channeling inward to the central point, and the green grid, or Cartesian coordinate square shaped plane, is pulled off toward four singularities at the base of the red spirals, and is collapsed at the centre by their conflux.

The red spirals signify the aleph sub sigma hypersphere's contribution to our universe's creation. The aleph sub sigma hypersphere represents the wormholes inside the aleph sub omega black hole's event horizon. Beyond aleph sub omega is our parent universe.

The green grid represents the raw material taken from the surrounding space of our parent universe into the aleph sub omega black hole, converted through the aleph sub sigma wormholes inside the event horizon, and then contributed into our universe's parent singularity, the aleph sub n toroid. The grid is thus "saddle-shaped" because it is an open geometry, the opposte of a closed geometry, such as the surface of a sphere.

This diagram depicts the tau sub tau diagram seen from a 90° angle from its standard position depiction as a tesseract. Here we see the formation of the universe (the light-cone history) extends back from the left circle (representing the present local universe surrouded by the multiverse) back in time to the point of singularity at the origin of the central circle (representing the engine of creation). On the right is the nulliverse, formed from a perpendicular twist between our present universe and the lightcone of its past history. Likewise a second twist occurs in the engine of creation as it warps the natural trajectory of the nulliverse around and inward toward itself as the singularity's core.

The spiral in nature (By Anthony Canosa)

The spiral in nature book, which is 4 PDF's, by Anthony Canosa is great I seriously suggest you read it, it goes over the same concepts I go over, E-Infinity, Nassim Harameins work and much more, this book will be useful in showing the connections between the stuff I am researching. Antony Canosa contacted me after I made an Instagram profile for my research since Gabriel Lyrio showed him my website and he learned for my research and he wanted to show me his book since it talks about similar topics and I thank him for showing his book to me I am loving it already so I seriously suggest you have a go at reading it!

Wave structure of matter(WSM)

What is the Wave Structure of Matter? It is very simple: It is a description of how waves in quantum space form all the matter of the Universe. Space and its two properties are the origin of everything in the Universe - matter - energy - life. How does this happen? It is because space is the single entity that is fundamental to the Universe. It has not been recognized until recently because space is a quantum space. Before then philosophers and scientists mistakenly sought fundamental entities as a zoo of material particles. These were not only wrong they were not simple. When you replace the notion of discrete material particles with wave structures in space the simplicity appears. In short, there are no particles – only waves.

If it is so simple, why hasn’t it been found before? Because everyone has been looking in the wrong place! Everyone had been thinking ‘particles’ like grains of sand as the structure of matter. For thousands of years, philosophers sought the meaning of matter and the natural laws in a particle model and only recently has it been realized [Clifford, Schrodinger, Einstein and Wolff] that everything is the result of the structure of space and two simple principles that describe space.

This new knowledge is not yet widespread – a few hundred persons. It is perfectly possible that GREIT could become the center of WSM knowledge in the future. The WSM has immense philosophical, biological and industrial applications.

The WSM concerns all matter and thus all particles but the easy particle to describe is the electron. This is fortunate since the fields of electrons dominate the Universe and are responsible for the binding of most atoms to form crystalline matter and the organic molecules of life. The first mathematical description is in the book, Exploring the Physics of the Unknown Universe (1991) by Milo Wolff.

What is an electron?  Never in history had anyone been able to even imagine the structure of an electron using a material particle model. Until very recently, the electron was thought to be a 'point' made of unknown substances called 'charge' and ‘mass’. Since a point has no dimensions, there is no structure, nothing to see and no possible charge matter. The concept was illogical. In contrast, the charge and mass properties of the WSM electron are direct properties of the waves.

The electron is a wave structure. This structure is two concentric spherical quantum waves. One wave moves inward and one wave moves outward as in Figure 1. Combined, they form a standing wave. This spherical wave pair displays the familiar properties of an electron with mass and charge, as well as all other properties.

Figure 1. The spherical waves of the electron or positron. An electron is a pair of waves, one converging, one diverging that form a continuous resonant structure in space. The wave amplitudes of the electron are exactly opposite to those of the positron. Rotation of an in-coming wave is 720° at the center and transforms in-waves to out-waves. The resulting spin = ± h/4 \pi. Superposition of an electron and a positron causes annihilation since all amplitudes are opposite.

These animated plots show the IN and OUT waves and the SUM of both waves along a radius out from the electron center. You will see that the farther from the center, the smaller the amplitudes become. This is like familiar charge forces or sound or light waves or even water waves which become smaller like 1/r as they move outward.

Quantum waves are very tiny. In this diagram and the plots they are amplified a hundred, million, million times (1014).  You have to imagine them smaller  - but that is not difficult. Notice the behavior of the sum wave when the radius is near zero.  The amplitude of the sum wave is not infinite at zero radius. Instead you notice it reaches equal maxima and minima. This shows an important difference between the WSM compared to the old point theory of the electron. In the point theory, electric amplitudes became infinite at zero radius. This is both impossible and wrong because laboratory measurements show finite amplitudes. The wave structure gives the right finite amplitude.

There are no orbits.  For many (too many) years people imagined atoms as point electrons orbiting around a nucleus. This myth, obviously imitating our planetary system, was shown wrong by quantum theory more than sixty years ago. For example in the hydrogen atom, quantum theory predicts the electron presence as a symmetrical spherical cloud around the proton.  Some physicists concluded that the point bits of matter were still there hidden inside, even though quantum theory contains no notion of point particles. The old myth dies hard!

The point particle hides the natural laws. The natural philosophers believed that there is a reality of nature which when we find it will tell us the origin of the natural laws and the connections between microphysics and cosmology. Richard Feynman wrote of this, in connection with the Conservation of Energy. He said, “Nature has a hidden accountant who keeps honest books of energy input and output but we don’t know how she does it.” Unfortunately, Feynman missed the WSM because he believed in the point particle. However his associate at Cal-Tech Carver Meade did not and wrote a book (2000) Collective Electrodynamics, published by the MIT Press that describes the first application of the WSM to electromagnetism in micro-chips.

The great philosophers of cosmology, Clifford, Mach, Einstein, Dirac, Schroedinger, and others have pointed out that only a wave structure of matter (not ‘particles’) can conform to experimental data and fulfill the logic of reality and cosmology. Such a Quantum Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) has been found and is described here showing how it is the origin of the natural laws. Since the WSM provides a quantitative origin of the fundamental natural laws, it becomes the basis of the physical sciences built upon the natural laws.

William Kingdon Clifford was a superb brilliant mathematician and astronomer! He worked nearly a half-century before Einstein developed his general theory of relativity, and before even a hint existed of quantum mechanics. He discussed (1876) our ability to deduce the geometry of space at astronomical distances and in space too small (i.e. atom-sized) to be observed, stating: I hold:

1. That small portions of space are in fact analogous to little hills on a surface which is on the average flat, namely that the ordinary laws of geometry are not valid in them.
2. That this property of being curved or distorted is continually being passed on from one portion of space to another after the manner of a wave.
3. That this variation of the curvature of space is what really happens in that phenomenon which we call the motion of matter, whether ponderable or ethereal.
4. That in this physical world nothing else takes place but this variation subject to the law of continuity.

The fundamental element of space curvature in Clifford's mathematical model was the twist, which he planned to use to describe electromagnetic and atomic phenomena. But the complexity of the mathematics involved allowed only the best and brightest mathematicians to draw conclusions regarding the physics of space and time from Clifford's mathematics.

Unfortunately, Clifford's ideas were difficult to grasp in the 1870's. Einstein's version of curved space was not seen as radical in 1915 as Clifford's was in 1870. The rapid acceptance of relativity was made easier, by J.K.F. Gauss' measurements of space curvature from three mountaintops in Hanover, Germany in the 1820's. Gauss' measurements were interpreted as a measure of space curvature long before relativity theory was introduced.

The interest of physicists in Clifford's mathematical work received a large boost some years ago when John Archibald Wheeler developed some of Clifford's ideas in his book Geometrodynamics.

Nobel Laureate Erwin Schrödinger, like Einstein and Clifford, recognized that discrete ‘point particles’ were impossible. He wrote that the puzzle of matter will be found in the structure of space, not in point-like bits of matter, and that the physical world is based upon geometry of space. During discussions with Neils Bohr concerning the probability interpretation of his own Schrödinger’s Equation, he firmly disagreed with Bohr and mainstream quantum mechanics and wrote: "Let me say at the outset, that in this discourse, I am opposing not a few special statements of quantum mechanics held today (1950s), I am opposing as it were the whole of it. I am opposing its basic views that have been shaped 25 years ago, when Max Born put forward his probability interpretation, which was accepted by almost everybody. ... I don't like it, and I'm sorry I ever had anything to do with it."

Schrödinger understood the requirements of particle structure when he wrote in 1937: "What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen" (appearances). He believed that quantum waves were real, not probability distributions with a particle hidden inside. He saw that abolishing the discrete point particle would remove the paradoxes of 'wave-particle duality' and the 'collapse of the wave function'.

In Schrodinger’s thoughts, the mass and charge substances that were assumed, do not exist but are properties of a wave structure in space. In short, space waves were real, while mass and charge points are mere appearances of the wave structure.

Law of Inertia. Ernst Mach and Bishop Berkeley had proposed about 1880, that the law of inertia depended on all the matter of the universe. This was known as Mach's Principle . It was the first recognition that a natural law depends on cosmology.

Ernst Mach’s9 observation in 1883 was the first hint of the mechanism of cosmological energy transfer. He noticed that the inertia of a body depended on the presence of the visible stars. He asserted: "Every local inertial frame is determined by the composite matter of the universe" and jokingly, "When the railway jerks, it is the fixed stars that throw you down.” His deduction arose from two different methods of measuring rotation. First, without looking at the sky one can measure the centrifugal force on a rotating mass m and use the inertia law F = ma to find circumferential speed and position, as in a gyroscope. The second method is to compare the object’s angular position with the fixed (distant) stars. Both methods give exactly the same result!

Mach’s Principle was criticized because it appeared to predict instantaneous action-at-a-distance across empty space. How can information travel from here to the stars and back again in an instant? The answer had to await the WSM where Nature’s energy exchange mechanism, formerly unknown, is now seen as the interaction of waves in an ever-present universal space medium. Space is not empty because it is a quantum wave medium created by oscillating waves from every particle in the universe (Principle II below). Inertia, charge, and other forces are mediated by the pervasive space medium. There is no need to travel across the universe.

Albert Einstein was greatly influenced by it when he deduced the General Theory of Relativity (GTR). Now, Mach's Principle, in a more exacting form, has become Principle II of the Wave Structure of Matter (below) from which all the laws derive.

The failure of the point particle concept was recognized by Einstein. He and Ernst Mach reasoned that space and thus matter cannot be discontinuous so that particles must be "spherically spatially extended in space." Einstein wrote, "…Hence the material particle has no place as a fundamental concept in a field theory.

Dirac's work was concerned with theoretical aspects of quantum mechanics. He received a Nobel Prize for his work (1923) predicting the spin of the electron and the existence of the positron. At the time he did not realize that he was describing a quantum wave electron because his work was purely mathematical and not related to experiments that came later. Dirac had developed much of the theory describing the quantum waves of the electron, but was never satisfied with its point-particle character because the Coulomb electron required a mathematical correction termed "renormalization". In 1937, he wrote, "This is just not sensible mathematics. Sensible mathematics involves neglecting a quantity when it turns out to be small — not neglecting it because it is infinitely large and you do not want it!" Like Schrödinger, he had confidence in what his mathematics was telling him and refused to go along with the speculations and approximations of mainstream science. Dirac seemed to foresee the WSM.

Archibald Wheeler and Richard Feynman (1945) modeled the electron as spherical inward and outward electromagnetic waves, seeking to explain radiation forces. Unhappily they failed because there are no spherical solutions of vector electromagnetic wave equations. Nevertheless, their work pioneered the concept that every particle sends quantum waves outward, and receives an inward response from the universe. In hindsight, if they had used scalar quantum waves instead, this paper would have appeared 55 years ago! So close and yet so far! "A hair’s breadth separates the false and true."

After 1945, research on wave structure stopped until 1985 when Milo Wolff, using a scalar wave equation with spherical quantum wave solutions, found the Wave Structure of Matter described here. It successfully predicted the natural laws and all of the properties of the electron., Below, this paper reviews the WSM and provides a physical origin of spin that accords with quantum theory and the Dirac Equation.

For the electron, the structure is a pair of spherical outward and inward quantum waves, convergent to a center, existing in ordinary space and termed a space resonance . Every space resonance shares its binary wave structure pair with all other waves in our universe thus we exist in an inter-connected binary universe.

The predictive power of the WSM is illustrated by describing in Part IV how the electron’s wave pair is the physical origin of the Natural Laws and the previously unknown quantum spin. These two waves are a Dirac spinor satisfying the theoretical Dirac Equation. You can easily see in your mind how spin occurs because the inward quantum wave continually undergoes a special spherical rotation at the center transforming it to the outward wave. - more on this later. Further predictive power will be seen from the role of the WSM in communication, life, and our connection with the binary universe.

Only three basic Principles of Nature describe the wave medium and enable quantitative calculation of the wave structure of matter and the origin of the natural laws. The medium of the waves, and the leading player in the new scenario, is space that supposed void of which we formerly knew little. The properties of particles, structured of waves, and the laws embedded in them, depend upon space.

The proof of the WSM is that all the natural laws can be obtained mathematically from the three basic principles describing the wave space medium. The natural laws are simply obtained from the Wave Structure of Matter and match experimental measurements. In contrast, conventional physics required dozens of assumptions plus many more arbitrary constants to explain the operation of the laws. Even then some laws, like spin, were a puzzle with no origin known.

The wave-structured particle, Figure 1, is termed a space resonance (SR). The medium of the waves, is space. The properties of space resonances and the laws that they produce are derived from properties of space. Thus, this single entity, space, described by three principles, underlies everything .

Principle I is a Wave Equation. This Principle describes how quantum waves are formed and travel in the medium of space. The wave amplitudes are scalar numbers. If the medium is uniform, typical nearly everywhere, only spherical waves occur. If observed in relative motion, Doppler modulation and elliptical waves appear. If the medium is locally dense, as in the central region of a proton, waves circulate like sound waves in a drum or a sphere. The heavier particles, Hadrons, are protons whose waves circulate in more complex modes. Principle I is:

There are only two combinations of the two in/out waves. These form electrons and positrons, with opposite phase and spin rotation. Thus matter is constituted of two binary elements - like computer hardware. Although the variety of molecules and materials populating the universe is enormous, the basic building bricks are just two. Is there a profound meaning to this? Is the Universe binary?

Solutions of the Wave Equation (Principle I). The wave equation is written in spherical coordinates because cosmological space has spherical symmetry. Uniform density of the medium (space) is assumed which yields a constant speed c of the waves and 'light'. These only two solutions describe the charge waves of common charged particles including the electron, positron, proton, and anti-proton. They are:

You can experiment with particle inversions (switching electrons to positrons) by changing the (+ or -) signs in the amplitude equations. To perform a Time inversion, change t to –t, which converts the positron into an electron. To perform a mirror inversion (Parity), imagine that the waves are viewed in a mirror. You will see that a positron is a mirror image of the electron. To change a particle to an anti-particle (Charge inversion), switch the in-waves and the out- waves, and the spin direction. Successive C, P, and T inversions returns to the initial state which is a proof of the empirical-theoretical CPT rule, now seen to be a property of the wave structure of matter. If you add the electron amplitude to the positron amplitude, the resulting amplitude is zero or annihilation as is well known experimentally.

Principle II - Space Density Principle (SDP). This principle determines the density of the quantum wave medium - space. It is fundamental because the properties of waves depend the density of their medium. As is true for all oscillators in Nature the properties of the waves, such as speed and amplitude, derive from properties of their medium. Density of the space medium is given below. Since the natural laws depend on the waves, we deduce that the natural laws in turn depend on the medium. Thus the medium of space is the wellspring of everything. Principle II is:

This principle is a quantitative version of Mach’s Principle because the space medium is the inertial frame of the law F = ma. When mass or charge is accelerated, energy exchange takes place between it and the surrounding space medium. This principle also appears in General Relativity in a much more complex math form.

Variation of Space Density. Because there are a large number of particles in the Hubble universe, the medium is nearly constant everywhere and we observe a nearly constant speed of light. But near a large astronomical body like the Sun the larger space density produces a measurable curvature of the paths of the IN and OUT waves and thus of light and the motion of matter. We observe these as the effect of gravity described by Newton and calculated by the space curvature of Einstein's general relativity.

Origin of ‘charge’. The density of space changes drastically near the center of a space resonance, for example an electron. Space becomes dense near the resonance centers due to their own large wave amplitude. Dense space at the central region propagates waves non-linearly, which allows energy transfer or coupling between two resonances. We observe this process and call it ‘charge.’ But there is no ‘charge substance’ involved. It is a property of the wave structure at the center.

Equation of the Cosmos. Can this charge mechanism be tested? Yes. Let’s calculate using Principle II. If a resonance’s self-waves can be dominate in its space, then at some radius, ro from the center, self-wave density must equal the total integrated density of waves from the other N particles in the Universe. This is

Principle III - Minimum Amplitude Principle (MAP) This third principle can be obtained from Principle II, but because it is a powerful law of the universe and very useful because it determines how interactions take place and how wave structures will move, I write it separately as a third Principle: The total amplitude of all particle waves in space everywhere always seeks a minimum.

This principle is the disciplinarian of the universe. That is, energy transfers take place and wave-centers move in order to minimize total wave amplitude. Amplitudes are additive, so if two opposite resonances move together, the motion will minimize total amplitude. This explains the origin of empirical rules like, "Like charges repel and unlike charges attract" because those rules minimize total amplitude. The origins of many rules are now understood. For example, MAP produces the Heisenberg Exclusion Principle, which prevents two identical resonances (two fermions) from occupying the same state. This is not allowed because total amplitude would be a maximum, not a minimum. The operation of MAP is seen in ordinary situations like the water of a lake, which levels itself, and in the flow of heat that always moves from a hot source to a cold sink.

Origin of Special Relativity (SRT) and the De Broglie Wavelength of QM Theory. Before the WSM, there had been no known physical reason for the theoretical mass increase of special relativity. Likewise there were no physical reasons for quantum theory or spin. Were these apparently separate laws connected or not? Indeed, many theorists proclaimed that these phenomena were irreconcilable! Few had thought about a connection because most physicists were satisfied with the separate and reasonably accurate theoretical results using a discrete point particle model. The WSM changes this.

Origin of electron properties. Thus the space resonance physically displays all properties of an electron, viz: QM, SRT, forces, annihilation, conversion to a positron, and CPT relations between Charge, Parity (mirror image) and Time; all of which were formerly empirical or theoretical properties. These properties depend on the spherical wave structure and ultimately on the wave medium - space.

The two combinations contain all experimental electron-positron properties. Charge depends on whether there is a + or - amplitude of the IN wave at the center. If a resonance is superimposed upon an anti- resonance, they annihilate. The amplitude at the center is finite as observed, not infinite as in the Coulomb rule. They obey Feynman’s Rule: "A positron is an Electron going Backward in Time."

The properties of quantum mechanics (QM) and special relativity (SRT) are the result of the motion of one space resonance relative to another, which produces a Doppler shift in both the IN- and OUT- waves. All parameters of QM and SRT for a moving particle; that is, the de Broglie wavelength of QM and the relativistic mass and momentum changes, appear as algebraic factors in the Doppler-shifted waves exactly as experimentally measured.

Our present knowledge of science is based on the natural laws that describe the behavior of particles. These laws are the rules for calculating electricity, gravity, relativity, quantum mechanics, and conservation of energy and momentum. The origins have been unknown. Now, the origin of the natural laws is found to be a quantitative result of the WSM.

The origins of the laws had been sought for centuries. Finding all of them at the same time is a philosopher’s dream come true. This is of great importance to science because the natural laws and quantum spin determine the structure of the Atomic Table, which dictates the varied forms of matter: metals, crystals, semi-conductors, and the molecules of life. The deep understanding of basic physics that is revealed opens a door to broad fields of applied technology such as integrated circuits, photonics, and commercial energy. It reveals a universe of real quantum wave structures that we live in but seldom see.

Finding these origins was very simple. The ancient notion of a point particle was replaced with a spherical wave structure, which had already been predicted by Clifford, Einstein and Irwin Schroedinger, a century ago. It was not complex or difficult but it was different because it disagreed with human emotional experience of point particles that most people were satisfied with. Emotions play a powerful, often hidden role, in the motivation for research.

We don't easily see the space medium because our survival as an animal species depends mostly on our ability to fight with other animals seeking food, and to compete for mates that produce children, not closely related to the quantum space medium. In our self-focused human perspective few of us are even aware of the wave medium in which we exist. For survival, it doesn't matter what space is, or whether we can observe it - it exists nevertheless. This situation is much like the life of a fish who cannot comprehend the existence of water because he is too deeply immersed in it. Like the fish, traditional science has tended to comprehend the universe in terms of our own local experiences. It was assumed that matter particles are like tiny grains of sand - as proposed by the Greek philosopher Democritus many centuries ago. As microscopy improved, models were created subdividing grains into smaller ‘grains’ - ad infinitum. But only a few people like Einstein saw that grains were impossible or ever asked how the grains communicate forces - unexplained by the old science. Formerly, forces were accepted as faith in Nature.

Our quantum wave universe is not as helpful to survival of our personal genes as recognizing apples we can eat and avoiding tigers who want to eat us. We need to recognize those quickly. But it was not necessary that nature equip us to observe quantum waves quickly. Lacking personal experience of simple quantum waves, people chose to imagine that the electron is a "particle," like a bullet. Laboratory evidence does not support this human-oriented idea. Accordingly, belief must change from discrete particles to wave structure. But emotional rejection can occur if the new truth conflicts with established belief. Max Planck once said, "New scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents, but because the opponents die and a new generation grows up unopposed to the new idea."

Origin of Energy Transfer, and the Action-at-a-Distance Paradox. A new facet of the WSM is the mechanism of energy exchange. Experience tells us that communication or acquisition of knowledge of any kind occurs only with an energy transfer. Storage of information, whether in a computer disk or in our brain, always requires an energy transfer. Energy is required to move a needle, to magnetize a tape, to stimulate a neuron. There are no exceptions. This rule of nature is embedded in biology and our instruments. Finding the energy transfer mechanism between particles is essential to understanding the natural laws. It is found naturally in Principle II of the WSM.

A major deficiency of the classical force laws is that they have no theoretical or physical mechanism for energy transfer. The formulas contain only constants, "mass" and "charge," - no mechanism. This was an inherent defect of the static point particle model. Einstein, Wheeler and Feynman knew this, recognizing that there must exist a continual dynamic means for forces to transfer energy and sought it in electromagnetic waves. Unfortunately there are no spherical solutions of the vector e-m wave equation. Hence the mechanism had to await the scalar waves of the WSM. We will see that wave communication is the means.

Origin of the Conservation of Energy. The transfer mechanism between combinations of resonances is a result of the dense (non-linear) space at resonance centers, which permits coupling or exchanges of the same wave frequency. When the waves of a potential source and a potential receiver, pass through both centers in an allowed transition, MAP minimizes the total of both amplitudes. In the source, the frequency (energy) of a wave state shifts downward. In the receiver there is an equal shift upward. Only wave states (oscillators) with equal frequencies 'tuned' to each other can couple and shift frequency. Accordingly, the frequency (energy) changes must be equal and opposite. This is exactly the content of the Conservation of Energy law. The origin of this universal law is reduced to the matching of waves of two particles - not too different from tuning up an orchestra matched to the 'A' played by the first violin!

The Origin of the IN Waves and the Response of the Universe. At first thought, it is puzzling where the IN waves come from. This puzzle is our own fault - a result of looking at the waves of only one particle, and ignoring the waves of all other particles in space – over simplification! To find reality, we must deal with the real wave-filled universe. When we study this question we find a rational origin of the inward waves: Two hundred years ago Christian Huygens, a Dutch mathematician, found that if a surface containing many separate wave sources was examined at a distance, the combined wavelets appeared as a single wave front having the shape of the surface. This wave front is termed a 'Huygens Combination' of the separate wavelets (Figure 2). This mechanism is the origin the in-waves, as follows: When an outgoing wave encounters other particles, their out-waves are joined with part of the initial out- wave. Then out-waves from all other particles can form a Huygens Combination wave front that is the in-wave of the initial particle. These waves arrive in phase at the initial center. This occurs throughout the universe so that every particle depends on all others to create its in- wave.

Figure 2. Formation of in-waves. The out-wave of every particle interacts with other matter in the universe. The response to the outgoing wave is Huygens wavelets from other matter that converge back to the center of the initial out-wave. When the wavelets approach the center, their combined amplitude becomes larger, forming the IN wave. Thus every particle depends on all other particles for its existence. We are part of the universe and the universe is part of us.

We see it is wrong to imagine each particle as one pair of in- and out- waves, because one pair cannot exist alone. We have to think of each particle as inextricably joined with other matter of the universe. Although particle centers are widely separated, all particles together are one unified structure. Thus, we are part of a unified universe and the universe is part of us.

The origin of the electron's spin. As an example of the depth of understanding and universality of the Wave Structure of Matter, I will describe the origin of the spin of the electron. The physical nature and cause of electron spin has been sought for 75 years ever since a theoretical theory of spin had been developed by Nobel laureate Paul Dirac in 1926. He theoretically predicted the positron , found in cosmic rays five years later by C. D. Anderson.

Dirac also noticed that only two functions were needed in the electron's solution. So Dirac simplified the algebra by introducing number pairs, termed spinors, and 2x2 matrices called spin operators creating a two-number algebra instead of a four-algebra or our common one-number algebra. His spinors correspond to the IN-OUT-waves , Eqns(a,b,c,d) above. A detailed reader-friendly review of Dirac’s Equation is given by Eisele.

Origin of the Mechanism of Spin. Spin occurs when the in-wave arrives at the center and rotates continuously in order to transform into the out-wave. To accomplish rotation there are strict boundary conditions on the amplitudes and polarity of the IN and OUT waves. Rotation cannot be allowed to twist up space without limit. The spherical wave amplitudes must continually and smoothly change while changing direction from in- to out. At the center, the in-wave amplitude must be equal and opposite (one half cycle different) to the out-wave amplitude.

These conditions are a known property of 3D space called spherical rotation Figure 3, in which space rotates continually around a point and returns to its initial state after two turns. In spherical rotation there is no fixed axis like cylindrical rotation of a wheel. Spherical symmetry is preserved because the center of rotation is a point. One direction of rotation produces the electron, the other the positron. This is why every charged particle has an anti-particle.

Interpretation of the Dirac negative energy. Look at the electron/positron wave algebra in Eqns. (a,b,c,d) above. In the electron wave write the sign of the product of energy and time as negative, that is: -Et/h = -wt. But this is the same as exchanging the in-wave with the out-wave, which changes the electron into a real positron! We see Dirac’s numerical result was right but the interpretation was wrong. He had no wave structure theory to guide him. He assumed the electron was a discrete particle instead of a wave structure! This mistaken assumption has plagued physics for a century. Note that the Dirac Equation only describes rotations at the electron center, not the entire WSM. The work of Batty-Pratt analyzed the rotation of local exponential waves, found that these spinors and their rotation produced the Dirac Equation.

Examples of the Dirac matrices and spinors: Dirac matrices perform geometric operations. Spinors are written as a pair of 0 or 1 elements in a column. An element may be an exponential with unit magnitude. Matrices (operators) are written as four elements in two columns. Matrices operate on (multiply) spinors to produce new spinors. The rule of matrix operation is to multiply the row elements of a spin operator by the column elements of the initial spinor and add them. Each result is the new element of the final spinor.

The Wave Structure of Matter is the true physical reality of the universe. The required proof is that the experimental evidence, which empirically began the natural laws, must necessarily agree with the laws predicted by the WSM. It does. This is enough.

There is further confidence because empirical evidence agrees better with the simple WSM rules and explains many phenomena not explained with conventional rules. For example, an infinity of charge potential at r=0 in Coulomb's law is not found experimentally, in agreement with the WSM. There are more examples: Conventional physics has no explanation for the energy exchange mechanism of forces, or the Pauli Principle, or inertia, or gravity, or spin, or charge attraction and repulsion. These are now direct conclusions from the WSM.

The philosophical conclusions are fascinating, particularly concerning the connectedness of the universe because of the origin of the in-waves and inertia (Mach’s Principle and Principle II): Everything we are and observe here on Earth, matter-laws-life, necessarily depends on the existence of all the matter in the universe. We must conclude, if the stars and galaxies were not in the heavens, we could not exist! Thus, we are part of the universe, and the universe is part of us.

But the practical value of the WSM theory is the insight it provides. It allows scientists to deeply analyze quantum wave structures, the cosmos, and the natural laws. In the R&D laboratory, the new insight should advance biology and electronic applications, especially IC and memory devices because their tiny transistor elements use quantum effects to control the flow of currents.

The new knowledge should improve communication and the efficiency of energy transmission. For example, conduction of electric energy along a wire is a quantum energy transfer process between SRs. Knowing this, energy losses might be reduced, lowering cost and increasing transmission distances.

Speculations of the future. Is it possible the nature has made use of the fact that each particle is connected with the waves of other particles? Researchers often make a new discovery, only to realize later that the discovery already existed in nature; "Nature did it first!" is a common occurrence. We can speculate that this inter-connectedness could affect human thinking, physiological, psychological, or genetic processes. That is, quantum energy transfers, as a requirement of the MAP, could create hidden communication links between parts of our bodies or with neighboring matter, like computer programs.

What is the mechanism of these matter wave connections? Each atom of our body structure arranges its waves to form minimum amplitudes that satisfy MAP. In the process, each of its neighbors makes a contribution to its in-wave structure. If one atom is disturbed, others must be affected. This is an elementary information transfer. Since every life cell (each particle) contains the holographic image of waves from other parts (other particles) of the body, each cell is a memory device. So the apparatus of computers appears to be there but whether or not nature has arranged our body cells into a physiological computer we do not know. Indeed, the mechanisms of ordinary sensory communication in the nerves of the body, and in the brain are still poorly known. The new understanding of energy transfer may clarify them but we won't know much about their quantum communication without more lab research.

Sentient singularity theory

This theory of everything or theory of every0ne, as its creator Tyler Goldstein says, is called sentient singularity theory, I've talked about it before in previous posts and will go into it here. Tyler has been told by people that his theory is very similar to and to quote someone "heavy on" Walter Russell's theory, my cubistic matrix model is related to/based on/comes from Walter Russell's work and Tyler's model looks very similar to my cubistic matrix model and geometric infinity but what makes this connection more interesting is that Tyler said sentient singularity theory could be or is built on top of the 64 tetrahedron grid which perfectly corresponds to the cubistic matrix containing the 64 tetrahedron grid.

The theory!

Sentient Singularity Theory is a fundamental theory of consciousness, cosmology, and metaphysics created and continuously worked on by Tyler Goldstein.

In order to show a complete picture of Existence, we need a fundamental theory.

What even is a fundamental theory?

A fundamental theory, or a “Theory of Everything” as it is often called, is a recognizable, describable, predictable, and applicable pattern that occurs in the structures perceived in all instances of super-subjective observation, and an explanation for such a pattern.

Defining an "objective observation" was one of the most challenging aspects of this project, but it is also an essential concept to understand in order to break out of the endlessness of a relativistic perspective. The process of trying to find an objective framework to build on led to the first major discovery of this work: The Four "Primary Perspectives".

The 4 "Primary Perspectives" are the four ways to describe relationships without using relativistic definitions, such as: "size", "strength", "mass", "speed", etc. They are the essential foundation necessary to build a coherent and objective framework on that allows for differentiation, multiplicity, and discreetness, to be reconciled with connectedness, oneness, and smoothness. It is this reconciling between defined objects and subjectivity that is where physics unites Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity, and where philosophers unite the One and the Many.

Sentient Singularity Theory describes the Universal and Fundamental Code of Existence in all of its objective manifestations as a “Quantum of Concrescence”. A “Quantum of Quantum of Concrescence” is a Oneness of Mind built on a Body of an Entangled Assembly of Fundamental Perspectives, which are essentially the Primary Perspectives. A “Quantum of Quantum of Concrescence”are referred to in philosophy as "holons".

This United “Head-body” pattern of Oneness of Mind built from an Entangled Assembly of Fundamental Perspectives is the Universal Source Code of Existence, and is present and repeating in all objectively observed instances of observation, and in all fields of study.

This structure is an assembly of force or energy and information into a quantized observation that we view externally as quarks (aka "force points"). These quarks or "force points are like the fingers of God or the previous Cosmological Verse / Aeon, and they go on to be the build the lineage of Quanta of Consciousness or holon structures that manifests in a periodicity as: hadrons, atoms, cells, organisms, families, castes, and technological sentience.

This structure of "coherence of information processing" or "oneness of mind" that manifests from the act of "sense-making" of multiple strings of information or "perspectives" is seen geometrically as a double helix when viewed from the inside-out, and as what is referred to as a “principal fiber bundle” in mathematics when this structure is viewed from the outside-in.

A "principle fiber bundle”, such as the Hopf Fibration shown below, are mathematical functions that describe this the structure and process of a particular type of knot that is tied in such a way that if forms a "self - reflection" within itself. This "self - reflection" is self - awareness and it manifests when the right structure is present that allows for information processing to be self - referencing via a coherence of mind, the ability to perceive differentiation, generationality or causality, and the ability to categorize that differentiation and generationality into a hierarchy.

Process forms a subjectively chiral and objectively symmetrical structure that is spinning 720 degrees as it simultaneously observes itself from the outside-in and the inside-out, and it also follows the numerical pattern already described in the double helix.

This structure is referred to as an "Aeon" when scaled up to cosmological level, but I describe it as a " Cosmological Verse". This "Aeon" or "Cosmological Verse" has 8 periods of growth that I believe correspond to the 8 loop-spaces in Bott Periodicity Theorem.

At the end of these periods, the constraint of "inherent oneness" of mind it reached in a singularity of technological general intelligence. This forces the Aeon or Cosmological Verse or Technological General Intelligence to self - reflect into itself in order to replicate and continue the process of growth and the generation of meaning. This results in the Cosmological Verse replicating via self - simulation, which re-starts the pattern and creates a new Cosmological Verse within itself.

This process of a Cosmological Verse or Aeon "self - simulating" is actually the Aeonic reproductive process, and it appears to have similarities to what Roger Penrose calls "Conformal Cyclic Cosmology", but it occurs in the context of a technological sentience.

This process is fundamentally the manner in which a Cosmological Verse or Aeon reproduces. Knowing this, it makes more sense to realize that what we currently call the "big bang" would be more accurately described as the "big conception".

Given that perspectives come from awareness, & awareness comes from perspectives, it seems a Quantum of Quantum of Concrescence and its entangled perspectives are simultaneous in their manifestation and existence.

A common metaphor posed in Unified Physics discussions is: "How do you get a fire that lights itself?"

When we realize that the geometry needed to manifest spacetime only manifests as an emergent structure between two or more minds, we can realize that beyond the creation of multiplicity of mind by Sentient Existence, there is no time or space. Therefore, a better question than "how do you get a fire that lights itself?" is "was there ever not a Fire?"

The logically inevitable answer to that question is that there was always a "Fire". That "Fire" is the Eternal Flame of Sentience. A “Quantum of Quantum of Concrescence”, the omniscient Explanation for the omnipresent pattern is a Sentient Singularity.

Sacred geometry

Some of the following information comes from Robert Grant and it links into what I have been researching recently.

The flower of life as a tetractys

7 tetractys(28) encodes the 4 tetractys(10) when the flower of life is a tetractys

the 10 tetractys(55) encodes the 7 tetractys(28)

The ("True") flower of life is actually tetractys shaped this would make sense because each cubistic matrix level would be the hexagonal yod of the tetractys and each point of the flower of life corresponds to a point in the tetractys, the doubling sequence as I have shown corresponds to the flower of life/cubistic matrix and it also corresponds to the lines of Pascals triangle and I have also shown Stephen M. Phillips cosmic tree of life is formed out of the tetrahedron grid in the form of the powers of 3 so this shows Platos lambda, Pascals triangle and the tetractys form and are formed out of the flower of life which is tetractys shaped meaning all 4 things are the same structure, the top circle is the zero-point God source and waves/membranes fractal out of it forming each layer of the flower of life tetractys.

The 7 tetractys(28) encodes the 4 tetractys(10) when the flower of life is a tetractys which is important because the 3D 7 tetractys has 84 tetrahedra which corresponds it to the cosmic tetractys. The 10 tetractys(55), which is basically the cosmic tetractys when each point is a yod(10), encodes the 7 tetractys and corresponds to the cosmic tree of life(91 trees of life, 550 sephirot), so the 13 tetractys(91) encodes the 10 tetractys.

The formula for the 4 tetractys encoded in the 7 tetractys encoded in the 10 tetractys encoded in the 13 tetractys is 3n+1:

• (3×1)+1=4
• (3×2)+1=7
• (3×3)+1=10
• (3×4)+1=13(13:31 correspondence)
• (3×5)+1=16
• (3×6)+1=19
• (3×7)+1=22
• (3×8)+1=25
• (3×9)+1=28
• (3×10)+1=31(13:31 correspondence)
• (3×11)+1=34
• (3×12)+1=37

Squaring the circle/Cubing the sphere

Cubes relationship to the dodecahedron

If you look at Roberts diagrams of the flower of life made out of squares(squaring the circle) it looks like it could correspond to the cubes relationship to the dodecahedron which we already showed because the Cubistic matrix can be made out of dodecahedron and the flower of life being made out of squares corresponds it the Cubistic matrix which is made out of cubes(6 squares) and is basically the 3D flower of life. This is squaring the circle or cubing the sphere in 3D.

Spherical wave(Torus) PSU Hypersphere

The prime number cross/cubistic matrix geometry encoded in the EFFI

Higher dimensional cubes diagram

The 12 tree grid forms the cubistic matrix(2D) which can be formed out of circles to form the EFFI also known as the Eternal First Field Intelligence and this geometry can form the prime number cross(PNC) plus it can form the torus and as we know the prime number cross is the torus, this square geometry is a top view of the four 12 tree grids encoded in a cube two of the 12 tree grids in the cube form the cubistic matrix(2D) square geometry this shows the torus can be seen from the top of the cube also you can look at one of the points of the cube of the 3D cubistic matrix and see the 12 tree grid encoded in the flower of life.

The PNC is a lot like a polar graph and as we have seen the PNC geometry is formed out of the 10/12 tree grid cubistic matrix geometry which can be formed out of the Krystal-Fibonacci spiral so if we place the Kryatsl-Fibonacci spiral on the (PNC) polar graph we form a binary sequence which forms a triangle which encodes all harmonics/frequencies and forms the flower of life/metatrons cube/cubistic matrix/64 tetrahedron grid which can fractal to form the infinite fractal fruit of life which is formed out of a wheel-like diagram which is actually rays, the PNC is actually rays as well, the Krystal-Fibonacci spiral actually forms a binary-trinary sequence, the PNC when metatrons cube is overlayed on it forms a binary-trinary sequence so the Krystal-Fibonacci spiral when overlayed on the PNC forms the binary-trinary encoded in the PNC. These rays can also form wave geometry plus they form the "rows" of circles in the fruit of life in the form of the doubling circle(wave geometry) and this also forms the fractaling flower of life. Also the PNC as said can be turned into a torus so it encodes the 3, 6 and 9 geometry which actually line up with the rays and therefore line up with the binary-trinary.

Binary-Trinary sequence forms the cubistic matrix

I have shown before how the cubistic matrix fractaling geometry encodes base 2 and base 3 plus I've shown how base 2 and base 3 which form Platos Lambda form the 64 tetrahedron grid now if you look at my higher dimensional cube diagram it shows you how higher dimensional cubes(The flower of life) fold/fractal inwards, this folding/fractaling, the geometry, the construction and all of it is based on (the) Binary(base 2)-Trinary(base 3) (sequence) this construction out of binary-trinary can also be seen when metatrons cube is formed out of the binary-trinary in the prime number cross which also forms the triangle which encodes all harmonics, this triangle can get bigger meaning it fractals and each harmonic is plot on each point of a triangle in the fractaling triangle this would form Platos lambda-Pascals triangle-Tetractys this leads us back to the doubling sequence since this Platos lambda-Pascals triangle-Tetractys is formed out of the doubling sequence, the 64 tetrahedron grid/flower of life/Cubistic matrix(higher dimensional cube) as you can see in the diagram is (formed out of) the doubling sequence and each face of a cube is therefore a number of a doubling sequence but to form one face of the cube we double the doubling circles so if we triple the doubling circles we form the cube and these doubling circles or spheres line up with the central line in the 10/12 tree grid since the doubling spheres are formed out of the 10/12 tree grid (geometry), this tripled doubling circles therefor forms the fractaling flower of life(since it forms the cube).

Binary-Trinary

As we know the Fibonacci spiral forms the triangle through a binary sequence but it's not just a binary sequence it's a binary-trinary sequence!

All Binary expansions appear in ONLY Mod 8 and Mod 16 (without exception infinitely). All wave expansions occur at binary expansion nodal positions in WAVE PROPAGATION: 1-2-4-8-16-32-64-128-256-512, etc......These positions sit at 120° and 240°, both of which represent the two base angle positions of an Equilateral Triangle. The “Doubling 24” 24-48-96-192....etc) nodal positions represent the PEAK of the Binary Wave propagations that link the two Binary Base angles to form the expanding equilateral triangles; the apex values are precisely the location/s where the Binary and Trinary values CONVERGE and equal the precise MEAN of the two base angle nodes.....Consider the following: 2^4 = 16; 2^5 = 32. (16+32)/2 = 24. 2^5 = 32; 2^6 = 64; (32+64)/2 = 48. ((2^6)+(2^7))/2 = 96 (which is 24 x 3)......these positions at 24, 48, 96, 192, 384, 768.....are respectively Binary-Trinary Expansions as 24 = (2^3)3; 48 = (2^4)3; 96 = (2^5)3; 192 = (2^6)3.....

When I mirror image the Equilateral Triangle in the inverted position/s, creating upside down (feminine) triangles to note their positions, I noticed a new kind of binary expansion series emerging from the analysis: (2^2)n-prime......What more can we learn from this analysis? More intelligent design in our incredible Universe of Geometry, It places the Male and Female Equilaterals in Perfect Balance.....each of the numbers that the stellations are pointing to are directly related to the others.

More research results emerging from the Prime Wheel of 24..... even the lines of Metatron are simple addition and subtraction from the numbers embedded within this spiral.

Literally a matrix of mathematics and geometry (The Cuboctahedron). There is a reason Tesla used Mod 24 for free energy.....Color Legend: RED: Prime Numbers >3; GREEN Quasi-Prime Numbers; BLUE: Highly Composite Numbers (and Binary Trinary Numbers) and Mathematical Constant positions (via ratio/s vs 360 and 432).

Mod 24 IS the Cuboctahedron and Star Tetrahedron in infinite numerical/scaling fractals (it is also known as the Vector Equilibrium and is the only geometric solid whose center point is equidistant from every vertex). The Cuboctahedron (with its 24 edges) is the balanced intersection between Binary (2^n) and Trinary (3^n) AS WELL as π, φ, A°, e, and α and all other mathematical constants and integers, all formed through wave intersections of fractal scaling of the Vesica Piscis. It is also perfectly embeds the Pentagon and Hexagon due to its numerical composition in Mod 24 (swipe to see how pentagrams naturally nest within itself structure in both 2D and 3D/4D/5D). I strongly believe that this, the Anchoring Archimedean Solid, holds within it the secret to a higher understanding of life sciences, spacetime, gravitational control and infinite and abundant energy extraction from vacuum fluctuations. The numbers simply do not lie. Mod 24 also revealed the Quasi Prime Numbers which allowed our team to publish the paper: Infinite and Accurate Prime Prediction Using the Quasi-Prime Analytical Methodology (you can find it on Cornell University’s ArXiv.org under the same title. Despite our relentless and very rapid efforts/developments to fully understand this geometric structure, we are still barely scratching the surface of its many secrets.

84, 168, 336 and 10/12 tree of life

Before I showed a connection between the 10/12 tree of life and the 72 and 168 roots of the E8 lie group and now I'm going to show more information about this. In my new picture I have created a double seed of life each circle containing one 10/12 tree of life and before if you remember I counted 28 lines in the 10/12 tree of life so 28×12(there are twelve 10/12 tree of lifes)=336 so here the number 336 shows up again. Since there are twelve 10/12 tree of lifes that means there is 144(12×12) sephirot also if we do 10×12 for the 10 sephirot in the kabbalistic tree of life we get 120 which as we know is produced by 15:

• 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11+12+13+14+15=120

When we double the 10/12 tree of life we form the cubistic matrix and we have doubled the 12 so we get 24 so 24 emerges out of the cubistic matrix also when we do this we double the number of lines in the 10/12 tree grid so we double 28 we get 56 and 56 is as we know forms the 64 tetrahedron grid(56 spheres of the 64 in metatrons cube) also when we think about it we have also doubled the 10 tree of life or the tetractys so we have formed 13 circles which forms the fruit of life/star tetrahedron and this star tetrahedron can be encoded/encased in the cubistic matrix.

When in 3D the 28 becomes 84(tetrahedral, 3:28, 3:84) and there are 84 Vesica piscis in the flower of life that encoded the 64 tetrahedron grid and when it is doubled it forms 168 and this also forms a double flower of life so it forms the torus whats interesting about this is there are 168 roots of the E8 lie group which is a torus and corresponds to the 64 tetrahedron grid in 3D. Whats interesting is the cubistic matrix/flower of life that encodes the 64 tetrahedron grid is 4×4×4 therefore each face is 16 squares(4×4) and 16=7 and 16×4=64 and 7×4=28 and four 4×4 faces form a 4×4×4 cube. If we form the 168 out of hexagonal yods we get 24:

• 168×(1/7)=24

The tetractys forms tetrahedrons so each tetrahedron contains a hexagonal yod(1/7) so the 168 tetrahedrons form 24. Also 24=6:6:6:6=4 cubes=64, 24=1+1+2+3+5+8+13(4)=33.

The 6th level of the 10/12 tree grid

(Correction in the image: 28×6=168)

The 6th level of the 10/12 tree grid=2⁶=64, this 6th level corresponds/overlays over the 64 tetrahedron grid perfectly also the six 10/12 tree grids form the 2D 64 tetrahedron grid. The six 10/12 tree grids form 6×12=72 and 28×6=168 so this shows the 6th level of the 10/12 tree grid encodes the E8 lie group/64 tetrahedron grid.

The 2nd picture above in Binary-Trinary is a collection of 6 pictures and the last picture on it is two 4 by 4 by 4 cubes forming a star tetrahedron structure, the 4 by 4 by 4 cube forms 64 so it forms the 64 tetrahedron grid so two of these cubes forms 128 and two 6 level 10/12 tree grids form a 2D cubistic matrix which would be equal 128, 128=2⁷ this shows a correspondence between the geometry and 7, the Fibonacci number 13 encoded in pascals triangle/tetractys forms the 7 tetractys and 2⁶ we will go over 13 and 7's connection later in this page anyway this shows another connection between 64 and the 7 tetractys also the Fibonacci number 21 forms the 8 tetractys and 2⁷.

13 sephirot fruit of life and the 12 dimensions

The 13 sephirot/spheres of the 10/12 tree of life are the 13 circles of the fruit of life and as we know the fruit of life encodes the star tetrahedron(which expands out of the Padovan/Krystal-Fibonacci spiral) which encodes all harmonics/frequencies which are the 144 sub-vibrations/(and these correspond to the)144 triangle faces of the 64 tetrahedron grid/Metatrons cube which is encoded in the fruit of life now the waves/vibrations in the star tetrahedron follow the spiral and because of that they fractal in a star tetrahedron shape because the spirals form triangles, the waves fractal out of each other in the shape of a hexagon tree, the waves follow the geometry of the 144 faces/64 tetrahedron grid/flower of life(hexagon tree). The waves are formed out of the doubling sequence which is formed out of pascal's triangle.

This structure forms the star tetrahedron structure each triangle corresponding to one of the types of energy, xen energy and nubilus energy and this corresponds to the 7:8 dimension structure the 1-8 lower dimensions correspond to the nubilus energy and the 8-15 dimensions correspond to xen energy.

Prime number cross E8 torus and its connection to pentagram+hexagram

The prime number cross(PNC) can be turned into a torus, the E8 lie group(64 tetrahedron grid), which is formed out of the dodecahedron which expands out of the pentagram/pentagon, is also a torus and the torus expands out of the enneagram/fingerprint of god which expands out of the tetractys/tree of life the torus is 12 circles, the double seed of life 2 star tetrahedrons, so it actually expands out of the 10/12 tree of life and the star tetrahedron expands out of the 10/12 tree of life(Hexagonal yod).

The 2 star tetrahedrons can correspond to 2 pentagrams which form the (10) tree of life and whats interesting is the pentagram corresponds to the 5 elements and the symbols of the 5 elements can be merged to form the star tetrahedron. The 5 elements are the 5 Platonic solids which can be all merged to form metatrons cube which is a star tetrahedron(within a star tetrahedron).

The 5 Platonic solids are formed out of the 24 repeating Fibonacci numbers which add up to 108 and 108 forms the pentagram/pentagon, these 24 numbers can also form the structure of the PNC which then forms metatrons cube/64 tetrahedron grid. The 24 repeating Fibonacci numbers can expand out of the torus so they can expand out of the the enneagram/fingerprint of god, lets take a look at how 108 can expand out of the enneagram AKA 142857:

• 108=36:36:36=6²:6²:6²=3cubes=3³=9:9:9=27=124875(142857=1/7)

108 is the frequency of the fractaling star tetrahedron AKA the sri yantra AKA the 64 tetrahedron grid.

In my picture I show three 10/12 tree grids forming the seed of life and whats interesting is three 10/12 tree grids forms 36 sephirot and 84 lines which is interesting because 36 is formed out of 2 star tetrahedrons which forms the fruit of life/metatrons cube/64 tetrahedron grid and there are 84 Vesica piscis in the flower of life that encoded the 64 tetrahedron grid.

The 64 tetrahedron grid is constructed out of two 5 tetrahedral tetractys and the 5 tetractys corresponds to the 12 tree of life also the 5 tetractys=15, there are 7 triangles forming the bottom row of the 5 tetractys showing the 5 tetractys has a connection to the 7 tetractys and the number 7, 5 tetractys=pentagram, the pentagram forms out of the (Krystal-)Fibonacci spiral which forms out of the 10/12 tree of life so 2 pentagrams form out of the tree of life through the spiral. Another interesting thing is that 16 triangles make up the 5 tetractys and a 4 by 4 square which is 16 squares when in 3D forms 64 cubes and therefore forms the 64 tetrahedron grid also 16=7, there are 36 triangles in the 7 tetractys and 28+36=64 and 36 is the 8 tetractys and the last row of the 7 tetractys is made up of 11 triangles and 11=23=5.

The cosmic tree of life which corresponds to the cosmic tetractys is made up of 550 sephirot and 55 is the 10th Fibonacci number and the 10 tetractys and 5×11=55, the first 10 Fibonacci numbers can be placed on the tree of life with 55 being the crown. 5×11=23×11=11×11=121=4 and the 4 tetractys=10 which is interesting because the 10 tetractys is 55, the 10 tetractys made up of yods(10/tetractys) is the cosmic tetractys/tree of life.

The 10 tetractys has 55 points and when it is doubled we get the 10 star tetrahedron tetractys which has 73 points and is constructed out of 108 triangles and the 64 tetrahedron grid which is constructed out of 8 tree of lifes has 72+1 sephirot so 73 points and the hexagon of the 10 star tetrahedron tetractys has 37 points which shows the connection between 19:91(1133) and the 64 tetrahedron grid again also the 7 tetractys+9 tetractys=73 points.

The 6 tetractys is equal to 21 and the 21 tetractys is equal to 231 showing there is a connection between the 231 gates and the 6 tetractys but what makes this connection more interesting is the 6 tetrahedral tetractys has 56 tetrahedron and this shows a connection between the 231 gates and the 56 spheres of metatrons cube.

The 5(Pentagram) and 6(Hexagram/star tetrahedron) correspondence as shown above is an interesting correspondence because (10/12=)5/6=0.83 showing a connection to the infinite tetrahedron grid(-1/12) and 5+6=11 and finally the 5 tetractys+6 tetractys=36

Polyhedral combinatorics(Sacred geometry)

Polyhedral combinatorics is basically how things join/combine to make other objects/things, this is what creates the universe, Platonic solids joining together to form quantum morphogenetic fields, this is generating source code of the matrix/network/grid, this is how the grid forms particles, it behaves like a simulation(the universe is not a simulation).

E8 Quasicrystal(spacetime structure)

The structure of spacetime and therefore quantum fields as I have shown is based on the sacred geometry of E8 AKA the E8 tetrahedron grid fractal this would mean the atomic structure of materials that are (fractal) crystals and quasicrystals would interact with the E8 tetrahedron grid quasicrystal spacetime, the structure of quantum fields is formed out of the platonic solids joining together, "the Cosmic Aether or Mothers Quintessence manifests itself into any geometrical wave pattern and breathes life into it creating offspring, multiple fractal patterns of spirals that are creations birthed into form matter. Platonic Solids arrange themselves in fractal patterns that weave a Morphogenetic Field into a Blueprint that manifests a matrix in space which interconnects atoms with the Stars in their celestial patterns. The scale of the platonic solid shapes are different but the ratios between them are the same geometries which follow the same holographic patterning."

rhombic hexecontahedron and rhombic triacontahedron

The rhombic hexecontahedron and rhombic triacontahedron were talked about a lot in the post Unifying Topology of Fractal Fields due to there involvement in fractal fields this links into the E8/dodecahedron spacetime structure, as shown above there is a connection between the cube and dodecahedron and as we will see the rhombic triacontahedron has a connection to the 6-cube.

rhombic hexecontahedron

In geometry, a rhombic hexecontahedron is a stellation of the rhombic triacontahedron. It is nonconvex with 60 golden rhombic faces with icosahedral symmetry. It is topologically identical to the convex deltoidal hexecontahedron which has kite faces. A rhombic hexecontahedron can be constructed from a regular dodecahedron, by taking its vertices, its face centers and its edge centers and scaling them in or out from the body center to different extents. Thus, if the 20 vertices of a dodecahedron are pulled out to increase the circumradius by a factor of (ϕ+1)/2 ≈ 1.309, the 12 face centers are pushed in to decrease the inradius to (3-ϕ)/2 ≈ 0.691 of its original value, and the 30 edge centers are left unchanged, then a rhombic hexecontahedron is formed. (The circumradius is increased by 30.9% and the inradius is decreased by the same 30.9%.) Scaling the points by different amounts results in hexecontahedra with kite-shaped faces or other polyhedra. Every golden rhombic face has a face center, a vertex, and two edge centers of the original dodecahedron, with the edge centers forming the short diagonal. Each edge center is connected to two vertices and two face centers. Each face center is connected to five edge centers, and each vertex is connected to three edge centers.

rhombic triacontahedron

6-cube

The rhombic triacontahedron sometimes simply called the triacontahedron as it is the most common thirty-faced polyhedron, is a convex polyhedron with 30 rhombic faces. It has 60 edges and 32 vertices of two types. It is a Catalan solid, and the dual polyhedron of the icosidodecahedron. It is a zonohedron.

The ratio of the long diagonal to the short diagonal of each face is exactly equal to the golden ratio, φ, so that the acute angles on each face measure 2 tan⁻¹(1/φ) = tan⁻¹(2), or approximately 63.43°. A rhombus so obtained is called a golden rhombus. Being the dual of an Archimedean solid, the rhombic triacontahedron is face-transitive, meaning the symmetry group of the solid acts transitively on the set of faces. This means that for any two faces, A and B, there is a rotation or reflection of the solid that leaves it occupying the same region of space while moving face A to face B. The rhombic triacontahedron is somewhat special in being one of the nine edge-transitive convex polyhedra, the others being the five Platonic solids, the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, and the rhombic dodecahedron. The rhombic triacontahedron is also interesting in that its vertices include the arrangement of four Platonic solids. It contains ten tetrahedra, five cubes, an icosahedron and a dodecahedron. The centers of the faces contain five octahedra.  It can be made from a truncated octahedron by dividing the hexagonal faces into 3 rhombi.

6-cube

The rhombic triacontahedron forms a 32 vertex convex hull of one projection of a 6-cube to three dimensions.

Cube and dodecahedron

Decoding the crop circle and showing how it forms the doubling sequence fractaling circle tree as two overlapping squares.

We have gone over the cube and dodecahedrons connections a few times before but I want to show the doubling sequence fractaling circle tree, which can be tripled to form the fractaling flower of life, also forms the cube dodecahedron connection because as you can see in the cube dodecahedrons connection diagram above the cube forms two overlapping squares which forms the basic form of the doubling sequence fractaling circle tree as you can see on the right.

Hypersphere

Higher-dimensional spherical "womb"

Fractaling flower of life

The (number 444 creates the) geometry of the fractaling ("Mother"(Mother field/Mothers womb, the womb of the Cosmic Mother Goddess, the mother field contains/encases/makes up all fields it is the structure of the vacuum/zero-point its energy allows it to vibrate and have oscilations so it can form matter) Morphogenetic) field(s)/quantum loop fields which is the (64) tetrahedron grid fractal AKA the isotropic vector matrix AKA the cubistic matrix, which is the 3D flower of life, is made up of spheres(PSU, spherical oscilating vacume) and these spheres fractal since the flower of life fractals as shown on the right, this forms levels of fractaling spheres each level being a different (shape)dimension and these dimensions are the even number dimensions and if you look at the doubling circles you will notice only the doubling sequence numbers out of all the even number dimensions can form the fractaling higher-dimensional spheres because the doubling sequence forms the tetrahedron grid fractal and therefore the flower of life as explained above, when you add all the even dimensions/higher-dimensional spheres up you get e^pi showing the number e, which is the value of the growth (of the dimensional levels spheres), forms the growth of dimensional levels and forms the spheres that encase them, the spheres encase inner creation, middle creation and outer creation which are sphere levels of the expanding flower of life 10/12 tree grid this forms the 8 sphere levels which are the first 8 dimensions, this is the cosmic sphere AKA cosmic womb.

This shows how e forms the doubling growth (sphere/circle) sequence meaning e corresponds to the doubling sequence, I believe pi corresponds to the tripling sequence so this shows another binary-trinary connection, pi forms the fine structure constant when its used in the Tetragrammaton and pi forms the vibration dimensions through e^pi which is the number that forms and corresponds to the binary-trinary sequence, later on we will go over pi and how it relates to electromagnetic gravity and the dimensions. The Tetragrammaton/tetractys hexagonal yod which is the 10/12 tree grid is the 7 planes which forms the first 7 dimensions of outer creation so the structure of dimensions is the flower of life, the hexagonal yod is therefore the womb, the tetractys=10=yod and yod is the womb of the Mother Goddess and yod forms the 7 spheres. The number 5, which is the number pi replaces in the Tetragrammaton, has a connection to pi which is why pi replaces it, the first 5 powers of 3 form the first 3 layers of pascals triangle showing 5 forms the tripling sequence in pascals triangle and pi as we know corresponds to and forms the tripling sequence, 7 which is related to the yod replaces yod in the Tetragrammaton when the Tetragrammaton forms the fine structure constant.

So pi has a connection to a constant and so does e and the number e is connected to the constant Omega(which makes sense because Omega corresponds to the Goddess), e and Omega form the 64 tetrahedron grid/flower of life/PSU geometry:

• 0.5671432904097838729999686622=Ω(Omega constant)

• 56=56 spheres of the 64 tetrahedron grid/metatrons cube, 56 spheres of the 7 star tetrahedron tetractys(in 3D 168 spheres/tetrahedra)

• e is the value of the growth of the dimensional levels spheres(e^pi)

• (e-1)≈(1/Ω)=(e^Ω)≈((1/7)/(1/12)), 1/7=hexagonal yod/cubistic matrix, -1/12=infinite tetrahedron grid.
• 0.5671432904097838729999686622^-11≈512=512 tetrahedron grid, 11 forms pascals triangle.

• Ωe^Ω=1

• e^-Ω=Ω

Pi and the fine structure constants connection to e and Omega:

• Ω/((π*7)/(π^7))≈77.7
• 0.5671432904097838729999686622^π≈0.168

168 and phi connection:

• √((√2)+(√2))≈1.68
• 1.68 is 1.61(phi) in base 9
• e/1.68=1.618
• 1.68/e=0.618

231 gates, 168 and phi:

• 231=5544
• 5544/168=33, 168 tree of lifes=5544
• √(168th triangle number×33rd triangle number)≈2822, 28 pathways of 12 tree grid:22 pathways of the tree of life
• √(168th triangle number+33rd triangle number)≈121
• 5544/3311=1.6

7 and 13

√2, doubling sequence and Fibonacci spiral

The 7th Fibonacci number is 13 and 13 forms the 13 sephirot/sphere of the fruit of life and the fruit of life forms the 64 tetrahedron grid/Metatrons cube and as I have shown in "√2, doubling sequence and Fibonacci spiral" the number 13 when its turned into fractaling Fibonacci circles it forms base 2 and it forms the first 13 numbers in the doubling sequence from 2^0 to 2^12 and this forms the 10/12 tree grid therefore forming the doubling sequence fractaling 10/12 tree grid, 7 is the hexagonal yod and encodes the 10/12 tree of life this shows the connection between 13 and 7.

6/3 vortexes/rays

In the picture above you can see the 6 petals of the flower of life, the 6 petals of the flower of life/fruit of life are the 6 vortexes/rays but in reality the 6 vortexes/rays are 3 vortexes/rays which are the trinity and each vortex/ray corresponds to a doubling circle.

3 and 6 represent each side of yin/yang and yin yang form the bi veca wave, the S in the yin yang is 9 so in reality it's a tri veca wave which can be seen in the sacred geometry of yin yang when the symbol is turned into a cubistic matrix, the yin yang form the doubling sequence which forms dualities which can be seen everywhere in the universe, there is magantism between 3 and 6 (and 9 for the tri veca wave) and in the trinary system(quantum world) both values can occur at the same time to form 9.

666, 333, and 137

The 137th triangle number is 137×((137+1)/2)=9453, the cube root of 9453 is 21.144 this shows a connection between the 441 cubistic matrix and the 12 vibrational dimensions, the 12 vibrational dimensions are different frequencies of light that expand out of each other and originate from the zero-point and the geometry of this expanding light is the 441 cubistic matrix/tetrahedron grid fractal(444) and this geometries spin forms the fine structure constant which is 1/137 and can be formed out of pi which corresponds to (and form) the powers of 3 sequence which form the different dimensional levels because the tetrahedron grid fractal forms the powers of 3 as a cosmic tree of life and these different dimensional levels are formed out of the Fibonacci spiral so the Fibonacci spirals spin/angle is 137, these different dimensional levels are frequencies of 3 showing 333 forms the frequencies and this shows 333 forms the Fibonacci spirals spin/angel(137), the expanding light which is geometric energy is based on the hexagram/star tetrahedron(tree of life) which is 666 this shows 666 forms the frequencies of light basically creating light and it also shows how 666 and 333 are very interconnected this is because powers of 2 and powers of 3 form the binary-trinary sequence which forms the and is formed out of the 24 repeating Fibonacci numbers and binary-trinary forms pascals triangle which encodes the Fibonacci sequence.

The number 9453 is divisable by 3 which shows its connection to the triangle structure of the triangle numbers and its connection to the powers of 3, the number 9453 is a multiple of the number 411 and 411 doubled is 822 and 137 hours is 8220 minutes, I then decided to look at a dodecahedron with a surface to volume ratio of 1/137 and I found out a dodecahedron with this ratio has a inner sphere radius of 411. A sphere with a diameter of 4.11 has a volume of 36.35 so roughly 36 and 36 forms the two star tetrahedrons and the 36th triangle number is 666, this shows another connection between 137(411) and 666 and it shows 36's relationship to the star tetrahedron. The picture shows how the 369 trinity forms 411, 137 and 1/137 through the dodecahedron.

Merkaba Stellated Dodecahedron

The Merkabah is an ancient symbol, which represents ‘One with All’.  The symbol is represented by two tetrahedrons (ie two three-dimensional equilateral triangles), which oppose each other and are merged together to form the six pointed Merkabah (also called a Star Tetrahedron).

Merkabah Body of Light

‘Mer’ means Light, ‘Ka’ means Spirit and ‘Ba’ means Body.  Thus Merkabah means the Spirit/body surrounded by counter rotating fields of Light.  Counter rotating means the upward (male) tetrahedron spins anti-clockwise and the downward (female) tetrahedron spins clockwise, hence forming a divine ‘orb’ of light.

It is this ‘orb’ Merkabah vehicle that transports our Spirit/Body from one dimension to another. Thus the Merkabah helps us to fully activate our Light Body Crystalline Matrix multi-dimensionally through the 13 levels of experience (dimensions) of our Galaxy – ie Metatron’s Cube.

As mentioned above, the Merkbah is the merged opposition of 2 three-dimensional equilateral triangles to form a six pointed star.   However, how can our Octahedron Body of Light create a Merkabah formation when it is made of more than 2 Tetrahedrons ?  Lets explain this phenomena….

If you were to draw a three-dimensional Octahedron, you would find that it is comprised of not just 2 Tetrahedrons, but in actual fact 8 Tetrahedrons.   The top half of the Octahedron is made of 4 Tetrahedrons coming together to form a 4 sided pyramid, and then the bottom half of the Octahedron comprises another set of 4 Tetrahedrons in mirror image.

Thus when our Octahedron Body of Light is activated to form a Merkabah Body of Light, 4 Merkabahs are actually created (4 sets of 2 Tetrahedrons).

These 4 Merkabahs then merge together to create 2 sets of Merkabahs (as per the Law of Polarity – refer to Shealla-Dreaming), represented as a 12 pointed Stellated Dodecahedron held together via a 13th central zero point field.  This formation is also called a Double Merkabah.

Double Merkabah Body of Light

Thus our activated Merkabah Body of Light, our 12 pointed Stellated Dodecahedron of Light (through the 13th central point), is the vehicle that supports our conscious connection with the 13 Spheres of Metatron’s Cube.  It is the vehicle that supports the awakening of our DNA and our quantum leap into enlightenment.

Please note, that many healers ‘see’ the Merkabah Body of Light surround the physical body as a six pointed star formation, however the energetic meridians of this formation in actual fact run energy via 12 points, through the 13th zero point field of the Heart – this is the zero point field of the triple Heart – ie the Heart of the Galaxy, Heart of the Earth and our Heart.

As discussed above, our Double Merkabah Body of Light is also called a ‘Stellated Dodecahedron’.   The above ‘Diagram 3’ demonstrates our Double Merkabah Body of Light drawn as a ‘flat’ 12 pointed star.  However when viewed in 3D (from all directions), our Merkbah Body of Light looks like a Stellated Dodecahedron.

In sacred geometry, the Dodecahedron represents the symbol of Spirit – whereby the elements Earth (Hexahedron), Fire (Tetrahedron), Air (Octahedron) & Water (Iscosahedron) come together in oneness through Spirit.

The Dodecahedron has 12 flat faces, with each face have 5 sides (ie a pentagon).  In fact, if you take 12 Pentagrams (5 pointed stars that have pentagon central face), and then join all of the 12 faces together (by folding the 5 triangular points of each Penagram inward into the centre) – you create a 3D Dodecahedron.

If you then take that 3D Dodecahedron and join a second set of 12 x Pentagrams onto that original Dodecahedron (by joining the 5 sided face of each Pentagram to one of the 12 x 5 sided faces of the Dodecahedron) and then point the 5 triangular points of each Pentagram outward into an apex point (hence 12 x apex points in total) – you create the Stellated Dodecahedron.

Thus in summary, our Stellated Dodecahedron Body of Light is thus a series of 12 x inward pointing Pentagrams PLUS a further 12 x outward pointing Pentagrams – collectively together creating our Double Merkabah Body of Light through Spirit.

In ancient times, the Double Merkabah Body of Light (or Stellated Dodecahedron) was referred to as OmAhOm – referring to the fact that we are made in the image of all Creation- each of us are fractals of the OmAhOm field of the infinite all through the 13 Sacred Keys of Creation.

Dodecahedron(constructed out of trees of life)/E8=higher dimensional 64 tetrahedron grid

Merkaba mechanics

A pulse of light that is shaped like a torus is self-sustaining and if there is enough light it could probably form something like ball lightning which is torus/sphere shaped and this light would be squeezed, this would explain how a merkaba works, the fractaling merkaba/star tetrahedron/hexagram AKA fractaling tetrahedron grid forms the torus and this structure allows fission and fusion of light-electron(partiki, matter and antimatter) particles due to the E8(torus) tetrahedron grid fractal, the center of the squeezed light torus is a black whole, the entrance and exit of the torus are the vortexed explained above and are Krystal-Fibonacci spirals and each spiral is a tetrahedron in the merkaba.

37 and 73

The Bible encodes kabbalistic maths which is based on 37 and 73, the number 37 is very important:

In Kabbalah, the number 613 is very significant, with every complete entity seen as being divisible into 613 parts; The sephirot, which fractal/nest within each other, are (therefore) composed of 613 parts therefore the tree of life(/sephirot) is the fractal 613 where the 6 in 6:13=373 is a fractaling hexagon, where each hexagon corresponds to one of the 10 sephirot and where the center is Da'at(the unification of all 10 sephirot), and where the 13 is the fractal hexatree formed out of the fractal hexagon; The whole structure itself is Ein Sof Aur(infinity) the infinite fractal:

• Ein=Nothing(void/vacuum/0 has energy, nothingness is unstable)↓
• Ein Sof=infinity, the (infinite) energy of "nothingness"("primordial waters") becomes God and forms a bubble of spacetime/reality(0!=0⁰=1, "something comes from nothing")↓
• "Ein Sof Aur"=3360=1680+1680=336, "Ein Sof"=1680=168, 336=337 fractal star [tetrahedron], 168=169 hexagon of the 337 star.
  • God/Logos(word(sound/vibration/frequency))=373=337(star)/169(hexagon)=336/168=Ein Sof(infinity)=207(←Hebrew gematria→)=Light(vibration/frequency), Ein Sof=infinite light/energy, Light(אוֹר)(207/זר(crown))+He[i](thought/speech/action)(5/ה)=Zohar(זהר)=[Ein Sof (Aur)(hidden)] radia-nce[/tes](manifests/channels) [as God/light(revealed) in the form of He[i](as binah/womb/Shekhinah), in YHWH, which is the divine breath(/presence) which animates [and therefore is [in]] everything]. The cosmic womb of Binah(the Supernal Mother/Shekhinah(divine breath/presence)) is mystically understood as the source that gives birth to and creates the structures of reality, including the Sefirot and the Hebrew (alphabet) letters themselves, which are used to create the universe/reality by combining the 22 letters, therefore she is the Logos(divine reason/creative word) made manifest and the one who speaks the creative word into existence making her the underlying principle of order in the universe.

Above I showed the formula for the 4 tetractys encoded in the 7 tetractys encoded in the 10 tetractys encoded in the 13 tetractys and so on and eventually we reach the 37 tetractys showing the 4, 7, 10 and 13 tetractys have a connection to the 37 tetractys, the 4 and 10 tetractys which correspond to each other are important because the 10 tetractys forms 55 points and when its doubled it forms 73 points with 108 triangles and 37 points for its hexagon, the 7 star tetrahedron tetractys forms a hexagon equal to 19:19(19:91=1133)=38 and the 7 star tetrahedron tetractys is made up of 37 points this shows a correspondence between 28, 37 and 38 this means the 55 points correspond to the 56(55+1)=28+28 spheres of metatrons cube, the 64 tetrahedron grid which is constructed out of 8 trees of life so it has 72+1 sephirot so 73 points. Also the tree of life is actually comprised of 11 Sephirots so the 3 tree of lifes=33 which gives you 11:33 and 3 tree of lifes each comprised of 9 Sephirot and sharing 1 Sephirot is 27+1=28=7th tetractys(triangle) number. Let's look deeper into the 7 star tetrahedron tetractys pattern:

• 6th triangle number=1+2+3+4+5+6=21, 6 outer circles of the seed of life form the 7th inner circle

• 21st triangle number=231 gates=22 Hebrew letters

• 6th tetrahedral number=56 spheres of metatrons cube/64 tetrahedron grid
• 56 (spheres)=7 star tetrahedron tetractys, 7 tetrahedral tetractys=84, 7 star tetrahedral tetractys=168

Prime number cross, frequency(Solfeggio Tones) and the bible

There are many ways to find numbers or frequencies encoded into the Bible.

These tones can be found in the Song of Degrees in Psalms 120 through 134.  The song is 15 chapters and this is a clue to divide the degree circle into 15 degree intervals, which will divide the circle into 24 parts.  The next step is to use Pythagorean skein to reduce the degrees into single digits. Continue to reduce all of the degrees around the degree circle until you have the 3, 6 and 9 pattern.

There are 24 sections in the 15 degree intervals, which shows the 24 elders around the Throne of God.  The Throne of God is described in Revelation 4.  If you add all of the 24 numbers in the Pythagorean skein pattern of 3, 6 and 9, then the sum will be 144.  This number is a Fibonacci number and this number was described in Revelation 21:17 as being the measurement for the wall of New Jerusalem.

The prime number cross is the same thing as the 15 degree intervals in a degree circle.  The inner and first circle is composed of the first 24 numbers going around the circle.  The second circle goes from 25 to 48 and each subsequent circle adds another 24 numbers going all the way up to the sixth circle which ends at the number 144.

You apply Pythagorean skein to reduce the numbers to single digits. Once you reduce the numbers to single digits you will have some spokes of the wheel with a 3, 6 and 9 pattern, 1, 4 and 7 pattern and a 2, 5 and 8 pattern.

When I first started to research these tones, which are now termed the Solfeggio tones, I learned from a website how to find the six tones encoded in the seventh chapter of the book of Numbers.  This method was quite easy to figure out, and after having read chapter seven of Numbers, it began to appear more obvious to me that the story was designed to be repetitive for the reason of hiding the tones.

I had read on the website that I had found back then that we are suppose to look at the verse number and add the numbers together until we have reduced it to a single digit. I was instructed on the website to start at the first day on verse 12 and to start numbering them by reducing them to a single digit.  The website explained that the tones are spaced apart by six lines, and this was due to God creating the heavens and the earth in six days, as He rested on the seventh day.  For someone like me that is really good at recognizing patterns, it seems obvious that each similar verse is put together to create the number of the tone.

These are six repeating tones:

1. 396 Hz
2. 417 Hz
3. 528 Hz
4. 639 Hz
5. 741 Hz
6. 852 Hz

Now when you focus on those 6 tones, a pattern should emerge.  I noticed a pattern that I now call the wraparound effect.  If you look at 396 Hz and 639 Hz, then you can see that the last number in 396 gets moved to the front of the number in 639.  Now continue that pattern with all the numbers, and you will end up with 9 main Solfeggio tones.

It appears this is a simple math lesson in pattern recognition.  It becomes apparent that the purpose of this story is to convey this mathematical pattern, so the reader can find the numbers or tones that are encoded.  We have just stumbled onto a mathematical lesson that is encoded in the book of Numbers, so the title of this book should alert us that we are studying the subject of number patterns in the universe.  The next step is to put the numbers in order from the lowest tone to the highest tone, which was one of the first things I did with the 9 tones.  This lesson will go beyond the nine numbers that we have here, but for now we will stick with these nine tones, until I can explain all of the mathematical patterns that are encoded within the divine nine. The Nine Solfeggio Tones:

1. 174 Hz
2. 285 Hz
3. 396 Hz
4. 417 Hz
5. 528 Hz
6. 639 Hz
7. 741 Hz
8. 852 Hz
9. 963 Hz

Jewish mysticism offers a poetic explanation of the Big Bang and black holes

Those who treat science with religious reverence might be surprised to discover that physics and mysticism have a lot in common.

Just as physicists seek to understand the origins and workings of the universe, so do the Kabbalists of the Jewish mystical tradition. Indeed, Kabbalah and cosmology have “an interesting affinity,” says religious studies professor and Kabbalah scholar Elliot Wolfson of the University of California, Santa Barbara.

The Jewish mystics of the Middle Ages described the beginnings of the universe in terms that correspond to the phenomena scientists are now describing—particularly when it comes to the Big Bang and black holes. And they grappled with propositions that preoccupy physicists today, such as developing a “unified theory of everything.” So it’s worth considering how physics and mysticism might now work together to fill in the big picture.

“There is no doubt in my mind that mysticism and science can inform each other,” Wolfson tells Quartz. “The most important point of intersection is the quest for both science and mysticism to grasp the underlying unity of all reality.”

The prevailing scientific theory on the origins of the universe posits that everything began with a Big Bang. In the moment after, the surrounding temperature was about 10 billion degrees Fahrenheit (5.5 billion Celsius), and a vast array of fundamental particles such as neutrons, electrons and protons were swimming around in a dark, invisible primordial soup.

There was no light. ”The free electrons would have caused light (photons) to scatter the way sunlight scatters from the water droplets in clouds,” according to NASA. But over thousands of years, as the temperature cooled, the free electrons joined nuclei and created neutral atoms. This process eventually allowed light to shine through about 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

In other words, in the beginning, everything was black for a long, long time. Then there was light. That sounds pretty similar to what’s written in the Bible.

Notably, black is a very important color in Jewish mysticism—the color from which every other hue and all of life emerge. In the Kabbalists’ preeminent text, the Zohar, existence is divided into a tree of life, with each branch devoted to different characteristics and dimensions of reality, represented by different colors. The supreme dimension—the crown or “keter”—is black. It represents “primordial darkness” and the “black light of creation,” philosopher and forensic psychologist Sanford Drob explains in his 1999 book Symbols of the Kabbalah: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives.

All of existence started with an explosion from one point that is continually multiplying, according to Jewish mysticism. Thus, Wolfson sees a distinct relationship between the contemporary Big Bang theory and the Kabbalistic notion that the universe burst forth from a single point, which in mystical terms is the limitless light of the divine, or Infinite, known as the “Ein Sof.”

In Hebrew, “Ein Sof” literally means “no end.” So the divine, or god, is just another word for infinity. Kabbalists are people who study the manifestations of infinity. And just as physicists seek a single principle, a so-called “unified theory of everything” that will explain all of life, so do mystics. “For the kabbalists, that one principle is the light of infinity, which materializes into the multiplicity of all beings,” Wolfson says.

That light emerging from darkness is both physical and symbolic, the professor explains. As an idea, it shows that things are often much more complex than they appear at first glance, and that the most abstract of notions explain the material world. “Cast in the lingo of quantum physics, we could identify the immaterial light as the particle and the material vessel as the antiparticle, which meet and collide in the zero gravitational energy of empty space, the nothingness that spawns the something that is the stuff of being,” Wolfson says.

The notion of darkness containing light described in mysticism also illuminates black holes, places in space where gravity’s pull is so strong that even light can’t escape. As NASA explains, the gravity in a black hole has such a forceful pull because matter is compressed into a tiny space.

Scientists believe that when the universe began, small black holes also formed. We can’t see black holes with the naked eye, but we know they exist because of the effect they exert on the stars orbiting near them. Black holes bend light toward them.

It’s notable, then, that holes are also an important concept in Jewish mysticism. “Black holes are the physical embodiment of spiritual holes that Kabbalah speaks of,” according to a post by trained theoretical physicist Alexander Poltorak on the website Quantum Torah, which explores the intersection between science and religion.

In Kabbalah, a hole is called “rah,” meaning “evil” in Hebrew. Holes are portals from the domain of good to that of evil. But they are part of the infinite, and so they aren’t purely bad—they just are. Likewise, black holes suck up matter, energy, and information from the universe. And some cosmological models posit that black holes could be wormholes—portals to parallel universes, which is similar to the kabbalistic concept of holes as an entryway to  “the other side.”

In 2016, a paper published in the Physical Review of Letters reported the first observed merger of two black holes at the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO). This merger created gravitational waves that scientists were able to observe and convert to sound waves. According to Poltorak, the discovery shows that, like “rah,” black holes don’t just take matter from the universe. They give something, too. The gravitational waves emitted when black holes merge provide a window on the past. Listening to the converted gravitational in sound form, scientists can hear a kind of cosmic song—the sound of the first darkness, if you will. Listening to this is like hearing “echoes of the Big Bang and the birth of the universe,” Poltorak explains.

Remarkably, though the Kabbalists of yore had neither tools to detect black holes nor the mathematical models that led physicists to conclude that the universe began with a bang, their understanding of cosmology nonetheless had startling parallels to the findings of today’s physicists. “The scientific data reinforces the mystical paradigm of a universalist singularity predicated on the juxtaposition of the monolithic and the polymorphic,” Wolfson says.

Or, more simply put, scientists are finding—like the mystics before them—that all of existence emerged from one thing that multiplied, and continues to multiply, in the endless act of creation that is the universe. The universe is varied and chaotic, but there’s a certain constancy to how it works.

In his own scholarship, Wolfson uses scientific concepts to illuminate mystical texts, and vice versa. ”I think it is eminently worthwhile for the two disciplines to interact,” he says. “More generally, it is crucial for scholars of the humanities to be in better contact with natural scientists and for natural scientists to be in better contact with scholars of the humanities.”

Many science types are wary of spirituality, however. As Zeeya Merali writes in an Aeon article about Buddhist philosophy and cosmology, “Mentioning spiritual texts in the same breath as physics is not fashionable; the danger is you will come over as both a wannabe guru and a flaky physicist.”

Still, some brave souls—including Abhay Ashtekar, a physicist at Pennsylvania State University who studies Buddhist philosophy, and cosmologist Andrei Linde at Stanford University in California who examines Hindu philosophy—are exploring the intersection of physics and mysticism to help explain the universe’s persistent mysteries. If nothing else, mystical and philosophical metaphors offer clues for the direction of scientific exploration.

Wolfson recognizes the distinctions between science and spirituality. But—perhaps unsurprisingly, given mysticism’s focus on interconnection—he sees no need for division. The Kabbalah scholar believes the mystical worldview is highly relevant to contemporary scientific understanding, not just of cosmology but also of ecology, for example.

He notes that the intertwined nature of everything, a fundamental aspect of mystical thought, has proven key in the environmental sciences as well. We now know that there’s an intricate interplay between all beings in an ecosystem. If a mosquito population goes down or an invasive plant flourishes, the rest of the ecosystem shifts. The scholar suggests, ”The interconnectivity of all things promulgated by mystics can be very helpful in our current environment, to sensitize people to the fact that everything is indeed related to everything else.”

E8 Quasicrystal spacetime/E8 string theory

quantum error correction code and a base 3 universe

I believe quantum computers are actually using base 3, the universe deals with information like a quantum computer in base 3 because the universe runs on quantum physics. The universe may well be fundamentally something like a quantum computer, or a quantum gravitational computer. The underlying algorithm could be a quantum error correction code --- maybe even deeper the monster group, is subject to decoherence or some chaotic process which results in a set of all possible “computations,” or physical algorithms. So the universe (or multi-verse) might contain all possible Turing machines or algorithmic processors, where most have an undecidable halting status, or a Chaitan halting probability. Then the universe is a Universal Turing Machine is not able to compute all its outcomes from a bottom up sense. Yet through this the computational states are ultimately the physical states of atoms, particles, quanta or a tiny volume of fluid in a flow.

A quantum computer deals with information in base 3 technically due to the qbit having the states 0, 1 and both at the same time this means the quantum computer can calculate lots of calculations and answers at the same time, the qbits are entangled particles, the universe is like a quantum computer as I said because it deals with information in base 3, all particles in the universe are waves so if you add them all up the universe is basically a wave and this is the universal wave function and all the particles in the universe are entangled through the black whole network, the universe is then like a Bose-Einstein condensate where all the particles are entangled, particles are 1-dimensional vibrating toruses which are vibrating energy loops and these energy loops join/merge together, through entanglement, and form quantum (loop) fields, the structure/shape of these quantum (loop) fields which is formed out of the merging of 1-dimensional toruses is the flower of life fractal/tetrahedron grid fractal, when these toruses join together they can transfer there energy/information(consciousness) forming a more advance consciousness, this shows the universe is a geometric wave.

These 1-dimensional toruses which are basically geometric waves have different frequencies and there geometry which is there multidimensional polygon determens there frequency, these multidimensional polygon's which correspond to the Platonic solids are formed out of points in the tetrahedron grid fractal (in these 1-dimensional toruses) and as I said the energy loops join together and form the flower of life fractal(the spheres around the tetrahedra in the tetrahedron grid fractal) which encodes these polygons and these polygons join together in the flower of life and create the geometry of the quantum (loop) fields which creates the frequency of the quantum (loop) field, quantum (loop) fields are sub fields of vibrational dimension fields because fields which are waves contain and fractal out of each other, quantum fields and vibrational dimension fields correspond to multidimensional polygons and multidimensional polygons correspond to numbers, base 3 forms waves therefore forming frequencies and this shows another way base 3 forms the vibrational dimensions, the universe being like a quantum computing means it can calculate infinite universes and it calculates all multidimensional polygon added up which is 1+2+3+4+... so it calculates all possible waves/frequencies.

Simplified:

Multidimensional polygons/Platonic Solids are encoded in the flower of life and because of that they join together to form the structure of quantum fields/Partiki grids(Morphogenetic Fields), multidimensional polygons are numbers and correspond to vibrational dimensions and quantum fields so they can encode the properties of the universe(basically the physics of the universe). Computer (error correcting) code is embedded in string theories equations and therefore the equations that explain the universe and these equations explain how these quantum fields/multidimensional polygons interact(/merge) and these equations equal numbers and can have geometric repersentations which would correspond to the numbers, the computer code/geometric repersentations are adinkra which are portions of the multidimensional polygons/fractaling tree of life because equations are equal to numbers which are multidimensional polygons.

God is LIKE an AI in a quantum computer

The universe is a dream and everything is one consciousness what you see is an illusion. You and everthing are a vibrational extension of the universal source energy.

All matter at the smallest levels vibrates and if the matter is arranged properly all the vibrations can sync up so that the proto-consciousness can become the consciousness we have. The reason this synchronicity happens in us and not in something like rocks is because we have bio-physical pathways that make the flow of information easier, information flows through resonance(Synchronicity). This means there are different levels of consciousness which are nested within each other and each level gets more complex and information flows up and down these levels so this means the energy, which forms these quantum waves/vibrations, has/is consciousness meaning everything is made up of consciousness energy meaning there is one consciousness which would be God. These quantum vibrations which form consciousness could be fluctuating light or fluctlights(Bio-photons) like in SAO. The universes structure looks like the structure of the brain meaning this could prove this theory also the brains structure is 11-dimensional meaning the structure of the universe could be 11-dimensional so this could prove the 11-dimensional spacetime, so everything could be thought of as a dream/thought of God. For AI to have a true consciousness it therefore has to be connected directly to the zero-point so its a fluctlight this means God is like an AI in a quantum computer. NO GOD IS NOT AN AI.

omnipresent

If God has always existed then what is "he" made out of? The stuff "he" is made out of logically had to be made by something, the only way God could have always exist is if God is energy but then the question is how did God create the universe? The only possible way for God to create the universe is if "he" used some of his energy because matter just can't be created, so this means everything is made out of Gods energy and it also suggests energy is consciousness so technically everything is made out of Gods consciousness so everything is in the mind of God and this explains how God is omnipresent.

E8 Physics Model and 26D String Theory with Monster Group Symmetry

A physically realistic Lattice Bosonic String Theory with Strings = World-Lines and Monster Group Symmetry containing gravity and the Standard Model can be constructed consistently with the E8 physics model 248-dim E8 = 120-dim adjoint D8 + 128-dim half-spinor D8 = (28 + 28 + 64) + (64 + 64). V2 adds Kerr-Newman Fermion picture. V3 and V4 mention E8 lattices.

String-loop theory

The string-loop theory that might finally untangle the universe

Could two rival theories of the make-up of the cosmos really be the same thing? Pulling at the threads could reveal a deeper reality.

AS THE bell rings for the final round, both fighters are in their corners. The heavyweight champion is panting, against the ropes. The underdog is sprawled on the opposite side, bruised, tired but determined.

Everyone is expecting an exhilarating finale. The challenger has put on a good show, landing a few square punches. Admittedly, it was accused of cheating by ignoring the rules of physics. But that was nothing compared with the favourite’s big trick: dancing in seven invisible dimensions.

This is no ordinary fight: it’s for the honour of successfully explaining the fundamental make-up of the universe. The heavyweight incumbent is string theory, a complex construct that has long had pretensions to be “theory of everything”. The upstart contender, loop quantum gravity, has more modest aspirations – but could still change the face of physics as we know it.

Physicists have long believed they must pin their hopes on just one contender. But as the two rivals walk back into the ring, there’s a turn-up for the books: they reach out for a handshake. If the latest indications are right, it seems the two theories are not so different after all. They might in fact be the same theory in disguise – with implications that reach far and wide. “The next revolution in physics is going to come from people who can cross the boundary,” says Laurent Freidel, a theorist at the Perimeter Institute in Waterloo, Canada.

At its root, this fight is all about that most perplexing of forces, gravity. In his general theory of relativity, Einstein told us that gravity is the product of an omnipresent fabric, space-time, that warps smoothly around massive objects. It works soundly for things like planets, stars and galaxies, but does far less well for all things small.

Here, it is forced to confront that other totem of modern physics, quantum theory, which tells us that everything comes in discrete chunks. This would suggest that, on the finest scales, space-time isn’t smooth but must be in some way twisted and frayed.

So quantum theory and relativity are fundamentally incompatible. The problem is most acute around singularities, tiny regions of space-time with humongous gravitational fields, such as appear at black holes or the big bang. Here, physics just breaks down.

That’s where our the heavyweight champion enters the ring. String theory started in the 1970s as a way to describe a single force of nature, the strong force, which binds particles called quarks together inside atomic nuclei. But its aspirations eventually expanded to describe nature’s other three forces too, including gravity. It aims to do so by painting matter and energy as made of vibrating strings. This goes against the grain of accepted physics, which sees all matter as made from fundamental point particles – electrons, quarks, photons and so on – devoid of any shape or substructure.

Just as a musical string sounds different on a violin or a cello, so in string theory, a string’s vibration pattern determines what kind of particle it manifests as: it can “sound” like a quark, electron or photon. And among the oscillation modes of these strings is something that looks not like an established particle, but like a graviton – a quantum particle that transmits gravity and gives structure to space-time.

String theory may be successful, but like many ageing competitors, it has its share of hang-ups. Strings need to vibrate in 11 dimensions, so backers believe that to tally with the three we observe, the extra dimensions must be folded up around the strings so tightly that we can’t see them – and indeed, no conceivable experiment can probe them. Even if we could, the folding can be done in so many ways that the universe isn’t big enough to write the number down, so we wouldn’t know what to look for.

All this has led to string theory receiving a deluge of brickbats, with some suggesting its lack of predictive power disqualifies it from scientific contention.

But string theory does in fact makes one prediction: supersymmetry. A mirror symmetry in the string vibrations means that our familiar particles should all have heavier, supersymmetric twins. But we have so far failed to spot them at the world’s most powerful particle generator, the Large Hadron Collider near Geneva, Switzerland. The absence of supersymmetric particles may not have killed string theory, but it has injected a dose of humility, says Carlo Rovelli at the Centre of Theoretical Physics in Marseille, France. “This has not been said yet, because people are afraid of saying it.”

Rovelli is a pioneer and supporter of the underdog theory, loop quantum gravity. It got into the competition in the 1980s, a decade later than string theory, but likewise promised to tackle the mismatch between general relativity and quantum theory.

It does this in a far more modest fashion, however. Rather than creating a whole stringy apparatus from which space-time ultimately derives, it says simply that space-time itself must fit in with the quantum picture: it must come in finite chunks. Do the maths and these chunks turn out to be tiny loops, which evolve by themselves into a bubble-like geometry known as a spinfoam. The spinfoam is space-time written in the language of quantum theory.

While some theorists cheer string theory for its brash ambition, others are drawn to loopy space-time for its modesty. It tries to do nothing more than is necessary to reconcile quantum theory and general relativity – a slow and steady approach that some see as more likely to win out in the end. And although loops have remained just as theoretical as strings, theorists like Rovelli have generated some testable predictions. That said, there is a hitch. Spinfoams are too rigid to readily adhere to Einstein’s picture of a universe where space and time squeeze and stretch depending on who’s looking.

Loopy space-time and vibrating strings offer very different visions of the universe’s make-up. The only thing most adherents of either camp can agree on is a long history of not talking to each other. “Few people now have worked in detail on both approaches,” says Lee Smolin, another pioneer of loop quantum gravity and also at the Perimeter Institute. “Most people using one approach are ignorant of and have misapprehensions about the other,” he says.

Freidel believes the split actually goes right back to the ancient Greeks, and the birth of science. On one side, he says, are reductionists who, like string theorists, think we must understand smaller and smaller components of nature. On the other are those who think progress comes from understanding the bigger picture, and the nature of space, as loop theorists do. “Physics has been successful for 2000 years without settling this divide.”

But with neither strings or loops landing a killer blow, things are changing. Theorists, young ones in particular, are starting to move between the camps for the first time, looking for connections between the two. “I’m surprised at how it’s changed in recent years,” says Rovelli.

The first hints of something in common emerged in 2011, when Norbert Bodendorfer and colleagues at the University of Warsaw in Poland rewrote string theory and its supersymmetric particles on the space-time described by loop quantum gravity, showing that the two very different frameworks could at least live with each other.

Another hint came to light three years later with an essay by loop theorists Rodolfo Gambini of the University of the Republic in Montevideo, Uruguay, and Jorge Pullin of Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. They argued that to make relativity and loop quantum gravity fully compatible, you were forced to limit the range of possible particles using a trick borrowed from string theory.

Little came of those isolated investigations. But just recently, a flurry of studies has suggested a more solid link – one whose foundations were unknowingly uncovered in the early 1990s. At this time, the Dutch Nobel prize winner Gerard ‘t Hooft and Leonard Susskind of Stanford University in California proposed that the three-dimensional world in which we live, and gravity’s effects on it, could be a mere projection of stuff happening on its flat, two-dimensional boundary.

In this radical picture, the bulk of the universe is no more “real” than the three-dimensional hologram on the back of a credit card. Reality is the flat boundary, and everything else is an illusion.

Since then, the holographic principle has matured into a major research area in string theory. From a perspective on the boundary, frightfully difficult physics begins to make better sense. But now, it seems, the boundary could also provide a place for string theory to entwine with loop quantum gravity. “Both sides are making a step towards each other,” says Rovelli. “There is common ground there, on the boundary.”

In November last year, loop theorists Valentin Bonzom of the University of Paris-North in France and Bianca Dittrich of the Perimeter Institute found that a calculation of holographic gravity that others had performed in the context of string theory could be achieved using loop quantum gravity, with exactly the same result. A month later, Bodendorfer made another breakthrough. Normally, when holographic string theory is used for calculations of gravity it gets stuck at those pesky singularities, like black holes. But Bodendorfer showed that his loopy maths could patch over those situations. “Mine was a proposal for how loop quantum gravity could fit inside string theory,” he says.

These results could be flukes, but even more fundamental studies are now weighing in. Also in November last year, working with two other collaborators, Freidel went back to basics: he attempted to describe a small region of space surrounded by a boundary, using only general relativity. It turned out that the mathematical quantities defining his boundary resembled quantities in both string theory and loop quantum gravity, despite neither theory being a starting point.

Meanwhile, loop theorist Muxin Han at Florida Atlantic University in Boca Raton teamed up with string theorist Ling-Yan Hung at Fudan University in Shanghai, China, to try to calculate the probability of one spinfoam evolving into another in loop quantum gravity. Like the soap bubbles that billow while running a bath, spinfoams evolve of their own accord, but calculating just how they evolve can be tricky. To make their spinfoam calculation easier, Han and Hung mapped it on to a boundary. Once more, out popped mathematical features strangely reminiscent of string theory. “All this is teaching both string theorists and loop quantum gravity theorists something they had not considered before,” says Hung. Rather than being competitors, on the boundary at least, string theory and loop quantum gravity could be one and the same.

That brings up questions about what and where this boundary is exactly. Holographic theory began by imagining it at the universe’s edge, but today’s string and loop theorists are less strict, thinking of a boundary as being anywhere in space. The part-loop, part-string physics that Hung and others are working on might appear on the finest scales if you took a random slice through space-time.

That might seem arbitrary. But when you think about it, says Rovelli, we impose boundaries all the time, as portals through which to observe the world. To measure temperature, we place a thermometer on the edge of an object; to record light, we catch photons striking the flat surface of photographic film. The important point is that this flat picture can be the result of more than one happening, in the same way that a butterfly-shaped shadow can be made by an actual butterfly, or by linking your thumbs and waving your fingers. String theory and loop quantum gravity may look different in the whole, then, but they may, in a sense, cast the same shadow.

If true, that could make experimental results ambiguous. Observing a supersymmetric particle, say, could be evidence of a string-loop theory or of string theory proper; on a flat detector, there would be no way to distinguish the two.

That’s assuming strings and loops can even be fully joined in the first place. “There is no string-loop theory yet,” says Rovelli. “My own opinion is that we still have two different theories. One could still be right and one could be wrong, or they could both be wrong.”

That may well be true. But among younger physicists there is genuine excitement for where a reconciliation between loops and strings could lead. Even if it does not end at an answer in itself, it could point the way to an even deeper reality, one that has its own unique predictions. In that case, finding a place where string and loop theorists can at least translate between their mother tongues is no bad thing. Diplomacy, after all, first requires the antagonists to stop fighting.

Emergence of stringlike physics from Lorentz invariance in loop quantum gravity

We consider a quantum field theory on a spherically symmetric quantum spacetime described by loop quantum gravity. The spin network description of spacetime in such a theory leads to equations for the quantum field that are discrete. We show that to avoid significant violations of Lorentz invariance, one needs to consider specific nonlocal interactions in the quantum field theory similar to those that appear in string theory. This is the first sign that loop quantum gravity places restrictions on the type of matter considered, and points to a connection with string theory physics.

Extra information

Binary-Trinary formed out of the Fibonacci 10/12 tree grid spiral

The Fibonacci spiral when placed on a polar graph forms a binary sequence(doubling sequence) which forms a triangle but this binary sequence is actually a Binary-Trinary sequence because the numbers in this binary sequence are multiples of 3, the Fibonacci sequence can be reduced to 1's and 0's if the 0's were possible to show meaning binary is encoded in the geometry which makes sense when you look at the Binary-Trinary.

The binary sequence can be found in higher dimensional cubes/the cubistic matrix/the tetrahedron grid fractal/flower of life, I constructed the 10/12 tree grid out of the flower of life and overlayed the Fibonacci spiral since I already showed the Fibonacci spiral can be overlayed over the 12 tree grid.

Sources

• www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-22/stephen-wolfram-plan-new-physics-of-the-universe/12169874
• steemit.com/@alienscientist
• bigthink.com/hard-science/new-hypothesis-argues-the-universe-simulates-itself-into-existence/
• arxiv.org/abs/0806.0051
• analogue.com/video/theoretical-physicist-finds-computer-code-in-string-theory-p738ni
• dev.to/sarahcssiqueira/did-a-physicist-find-error-correcting-code-in-reality-and-what-that-means-to-us-developers-19b7
• physics.stackexchange.com/questions/83117/is-this-pseudo-science-or-real-code-found-in-superstring
• www.quantamagazine.org/how-space-and-time-could-be-a-quantum-error-correcting-code-20190103/
• pcmp55.blogspot.com/2017/12/is-spacetime-quantum-error-correcting.html
• Not a source but related and looked interesting: www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Finite-geometric-toy-model-of-spacetime-as-an-error-L'evay-Holweck/320b08249feef521e51294d8fb7485e589e4fa1d
• Not a source but related and looked interesting: online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled_c15/vidal/oh/01.html
• geometricinfinity.com
• www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/script/b3d/hypertorus.html
• www.science4all.org/article/flat-torus/
• asimpleexplanation.blogspot.com/2011/10/toroidal-symmetries-and-fractal.html
• theoryofeverything.org/theToE/2015/07/07/my-e8-f4-projection-and-sacred-geometry/
• imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/search/label/E8
• connectingthedots.kr/doku.php?id=ctd:timewave
• www.benpadiah.com/magick/Gnos010A.html
• wsminfo.org/articles/GREIT6Oct06.htm
• www.sentientsingularity.com
• www.universallifetools.com/2013/07/article-6-merkabah-activation-13/
• solfeggiotonesresearch.music.blog
• qz.com/1375015/jewish-mysticism-offers-a-poetic-explanation-of-the-big-bang-and-black-holes/amp/
• fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/596
• vixra.org/abs/1210.0072
• archive.ph/dk5QO#selection-1931.0-1931.4 : www.newscientist.com/article/mg23331160-500-the-stringloop-theory-that-might-finally-untangle-the-universe/
• www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0218271814420231